*may or may not be* enough - a huge amount depends on your workloads.
As ever, watching the available memory and how much CPU is in use in
"top" will give you a better idea of how your infrastructure is
behaving, as will watching the server charts in virt-manager if it's
available. For example, for some of our workloads, we can overcommit
memory by a factor of two (so run nearly 200G of virtual server RAM on
a 96G machine) and overcommit CPU by nearly a factor of three, and
everything's fine. For other workloads, they need to get all the
resources we promised them.
Sorry not to give an exact answer; it's a rather similar situation to
"is this machine big enough to run my database server?" but with more
variables.
- Peter
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 17:20, Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:05 PM Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas(a)tao.at> wrote:
>
> That depends on what you plan on doing with the host. IIRC live VM
> migrations use host CPU time, and depending on transport can use quite a
> bit of CPU (for encryption/compression). Same with storage, if you have
> a ZFS/btrfs/LVM2/RAID/encryption setup that requires a lot of CPU,
> that's also counted against host CPU time.
>
> libvirtd itself doesn't need all that much resources for itself, that
> said. 2 cores and 2GB RAM should suffice as baseline? Plus whatever you
> need to meet above needs, if any apply.
>
Hi Sven,
So for host OS, 2 vCPU's with 2GB Memory is enough. Please comment. I have spawned 10
KVM based VM's with CentOS 7.6 on the bare metal server (Dell R630 Poweredge 1U with
32 cores vCPU's and 96 GB RAM.) Is there a way to find out the system resources
utilization for all the 10 VM's?
Best Regards,
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users