Re: virt-manager vs cli

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:28:27AM +0200, vrms wrote: Feature-wise, no, virt-manager doesn't expose every single knob libvirt supports and there's a very good reason for that - can you imagine how exhausting, discouraging and potentially very confusing it would be for regular users to crunch through all the settings? Virt-manager aims at desktop virtualization where it's unlikely that users will need some advanced tunning features libvirt supports. However, if you wish to do so anyway, virt-manager does have an XML editor where you can add the all the advanced settings you care about. Take the AMD Secure Virtualization feature for example. It would be great if virt-manager supported it, but the current state of the technology doesn't allow us to fully automate the decision process, IOW user intervention is still required in terms of configuration, so you can't just select 'yes - I want AMD SEV' + the specific settings were overall deemed very complex and thus unfit for virt-manager's target audience. If you want GUI that comes the closest in terms of exposing all libvirt features, you may want to look at oVirt, but beware that running oVirt in a single-node setup for desktop virtualization is an overkill. Then there's cockpit (a web interface manager) which is supposed to replace virt-manager in the future, but IIRC it's about on the same level in terms of libvirt feature parity as virt-manager, in some areas the former can do more in others less than the latter, but cockpit is the new shiny thing, so it's being developed rapidly. Regards, Erik