בתאריך 27 באפר׳ 2016 5:37 אחה״צ, "Cole Robinson" <crobinso@redhat.com> כתב:
On 04/27/2016 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:17:19PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 04/26/2016 02:56 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
On 04/26/2016 09:35 AM, Shahar Havivi wrote:
On 26.04.16 15:30, Shahar Havivi wrote:
Libvirt doesn't invoke qemu-img check anywhere AFAIK, so if that's
way to get that info, then it isn't available
We would like to report progress for downloads, so we need to know in advance what is the size of the download.
I guess we can use an estimate (e.g. capacity * 1.1), or maybe someone have a better idea how to estimate the download size?
Hmm, I didn't realize <capacity> for a qcow2 volume isn't the full size on disk, but instead the size of the virtual disk image. We should
wrote: the only probably add
an extra volume field to report the actual on disk size too. Please file a RHEL bug
<physical> is intended to give the actual size on disk.
Hmm I see we do track a src->physical value via virstoragefile but that isn't reflected in the storage volume XML at all, there's no <physical> XML element. Should be simple to add, but someone on ovirt side please file an RFE so it's properly prioritized
Sure, we will file a bug.
Thanks, Cole