Hi All
We are currently testing our product using KVM as the
hypervisor. We are not using KVM as a bare-metal hypervisor. We
use it on top of a RHEL installation. So basically RHEL acts as
our host and using KVM we deploy guests on this system.
We have all along tested and shipped our application image for
VMware ESXi installations , So this it the first time we are
trying our application image on a KVM hypervisor.
On this front i have done some tests to find out how our
application's response time is when deployed on KVM and then
compare it with a VM deployed on VMware ESXi. We have a
benchmark test that basically loads the application simulating a
load of 100 parallel users logging into the system and
downloading reports. These tests basically use a HTTP GET query
to load the application VM. In addition to that i have taken
care to use the same hardware for both the tests , one with
RHEL(Host)+KVM and another with VMware ESXi. All the hardware
specifications for both the servers remain the same. The load
test also remains the same for testing with both the servers.
First observation is that the average response time on the
VMware ESXi is : 500 milli-seconds while the application's
average response time when deployed using RHEL(Host)+ KVM is :
1050 milli-seconds. The response time of the application when
deployed on KVM is twice as much as when it is deployed using
VMware ESXi.
I did few more tests to find which sub-system on these servers
shows varying metrics.
First i started with IOZone to find out if there is any mismatch
in the speed with which data is read / written to the local disk
on the two VMs and found that "Read" speed in the VM that was
deployed using RHEL(Host)+KVM was twice as slow as the VM which
was deployed using VMware ESXi.
For more on IoZone , Please refer : http://www.iozone.org/
more specifically the following IoZone metrics were twice as
less when compared to the server running with VMware ESXi:
Read |
Re-read |
Reverse-Read |
Stride Read |
Note: I had run the IoZone tests on the VMs on both the servers.
Second observation to be made was the output from the "top"
command. I could see that the VM deployed on RHEL(Host)+KVM was
showing high numbers for the following metrics when compared
with the VM deployed on VMware ESXi:
load averages
%sy for all the logical processors
%si for all the logical processors
i debugged further to find out which device is causing more
interrupts and found it to be "ide0" , See the output from the
/proc/interrupts file below:
The other interrupts apart from ide0 are pretty much similar to
the VM deployed using VMware ESXi.
************/proc/interrupts *******************
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7
0: 795827 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 65 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
6: 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge floppy
8: 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
10: 425785 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level virtio0,
eth0
11: 47 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level
uhci_hcd:usb1, HDA Intel
12: 730 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 188086 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0
NMI: 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
LOC: 795813 795798 795783 795767 795752
795737 795723 795709
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
*********************************************
Any pointers to improving the response time for the VM for
RHEL(Host)+KVM installation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Jatin
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
Forgot to provide this information.