בתאריך 27 באפר׳ 2016 5:37 אחה״צ, "Cole Robinson" <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
כתב:
On 04/27/2016 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:17:19PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 02:56 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>> On 04/26/2016 09:35 AM, Shahar Havivi wrote:
>>>>> On 26.04.16 15:30, Shahar Havivi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Libvirt doesn't invoke qemu-img check anywhere AFAIK, so if
that's
the only
>>>> way to get that info, then it isn't available
>>>
>>> We would like to report progress for downloads, so we need to know in
advance
>>> what is the size of the download.
>>>
>>> I guess we can use an estimate (e.g. capacity * 1.1), or maybe
someone
have
>>> a better idea how to estimate the download size?
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, I didn't realize <capacity> for a qcow2 volume isn't the full
size on
>> disk, but instead the size of the virtual disk image. We
should
probably add
>> an extra volume field to report the actual on disk size too.
Please
file a
>> RHEL bug
>
> <physical> is intended to give the actual size on disk.
>
Hmm I see we do track a src->physical value via virstoragefile but that
isn't
reflected in the storage volume XML at all, there's no
<physical> XML
element.
Should be simple to add, but someone on ovirt side please file an RFE
so
it's
properly prioritized
Sure, we will file a bug.
Thanks,
Cole