I know that, I had the same issue due to the fact one of my host had its
name in front of the localhost address in my /etc/hosts (like : "127.0.0.1
localhost linux72" ) ... But it's maybe not the same problem
2010/7/21 Alex Jia <ajia(a)redhat.com>
I am not sure if libvirt has resolved hostname and ip mapping
problem, it
had better that two
hosts have same domain name, such as "dhcp-1-2-3.nay.redhat.com" and "
dhcp-4-5-6.nay.redhat.com".
In addition, I haven't seen your any storage pool information on two hosts,
you need to create
a sharing storage such as nfs sharing folder, and your guest is in the
storage, of course, you
may also manually mount your nfs folder to target host instead of creating
storage pool.
Best Regards,
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "姚远" <sihuyy(a)gmail.com>
To: libvir-list(a)redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:39:15 PM GMT +08:00 Beijing / Chongqing /
Hong Kong / Urumqi
Subject: [libvirt] A problem in live migration
In virsh, I use command "migrate --live 1 qemu+ssh:// 10.1.10.60/system "
to do live migration,but it shows error "internal error hostname on
destination resolved to localhost, but migration requires an FQDN". I don't
know why, and who do live migration successfully can help me. Thank you!
My source and destination system are all fedora-13-x86_64, and the version
of libvirt is 0.8.2
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list