[Libvir] [PATCH] _N() has a conflict in Solaris
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
There is a conflict with _N() in Solaris.
Hmm, not entirely sure what I was thinking of when I chose _N anyway, it looks like N_ is the more common standard. Would using N_ work for Solaris ? Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
There is a conflict with _N() in Solaris.
Hmm, not entirely sure what I was thinking of when I chose _N anyway, it looks like N_ is the more common standard. Would using N_ work for Solaris ?
I updated the patch and am doing a build now. Will let you know later tonight. Mark
Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
On 6/14/07, Mark Johnson <johnson.nh@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
There is a conflict with _N() in Solaris.
Hmm, not entirely sure what I was thinking of when I chose _N anyway, it looks like N_ is the more common standard. Would using N_ work for Solaris ?
I updated the patch and am doing a build now. Will let you know later tonight.
That was fine, update patch attached... Mark.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:01:54PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
On 6/14/07, Mark Johnson <johnson.nh@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
There is a conflict with _N() in Solaris.
Hmm, not entirely sure what I was thinking of when I chose _N anyway, it looks like N_ is the more common standard. Would using N_ work for Solaris ?
I updated the patch and am doing a build now. Will let you know later tonight.
That was fine, update patch attached...
+1, thanks, Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
participants (3)
-
Daniel P. Berrange -
Daniel Veillard -
Mark Johnson