[Remember /not/ to top-post on technical lists.] At Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:28:28 +0200, Pasquale Dir wrote: > > Hello, > is it ok if I'll send multiple patches for each added function? I'd start > with the getCPUStats which is the most complex as it introduces new jna > types too. Yes, that would be a good start. (although I'd probably do it in reverse, starting out with the small changes, then tackling the complex ones). > As for Thread.sleep() is it ok to substitute it with a wait(long) ? Or you > have any alternative? That wait is needed for the alghoritm to work. I'm not convinced that this functionality belongs into the library at all. Maybe we could add a convenience method doing the computation for two given stats and a time period, but I don't feel strongly in support of adding this method. Regards, Claudio