5:29 a.m.
The latest container build failed; this series addresses the
underlying issue.
Andrea Bolognani (2):
mappings: Refactor librbd mapping
mappings: Remove librbd from Debian on mipsel going forward
guests/vars/mappings.yml | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.24.1
5:29 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH 1/2] mappings: Refactor librbd mapping
All RPM-based distributions except for CentOS 7 use the same name.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
---
guests/vars/mappings.yml | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guests/vars/mappings.yml b/guests/vars/mappings.yml
index 69750ad..ac2ae58 100644
--- a/guests/vars/mappings.yml
+++ b/guests/vars/mappings.yml
@@ -398,10 +398,8 @@ mappings:
librbd:
deb: librbd-dev
- Fedora: librbd-devel
+ rpm: librbd-devel
CentOS7: librbd1-devel
- CentOS8: librbd-devel
- OpenSUSE: librbd-devel
cross-policy-deb: foreign
libselinux:
--
2.24.1
6:08 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH 1/2] mappings: Refactor librbd mapping
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:18PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
All RPM-based distributions except for CentOS 7 use the same name.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
---
guests/vars/mappings.yml | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
5:29 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH 2/2] mappings: Remove librbd from Debian on mipsel going forward
The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects
sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so
just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
---
guests/vars/mappings.yml | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guests/vars/mappings.yml b/guests/vars/mappings.yml
index ac2ae58..1d8d1e0 100644
--- a/guests/vars/mappings.yml
+++ b/guests/vars/mappings.yml
@@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ mappings:
deb: librbd-dev
rpm: librbd-devel
CentOS7: librbd1-devel
+ mipsel-deb:
+ mipsel-Debian9: librbd-dev
+ mipsel-Debian10: librbd-dev
cross-policy-deb: foreign
libselinux:
--
2.24.1
5:35 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH 2/2] mappings: Remove librbd from Debian on mipsel going forward
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only
affects
sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so
just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly.
IIRC, rbd upstream dropped support for any 32-bit architecture, so
I wouldn't be surprised if this disappears from other arches too.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
---
guests/vars/mappings.yml | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guests/vars/mappings.yml b/guests/vars/mappings.yml
index ac2ae58..1d8d1e0 100644
--- a/guests/vars/mappings.yml
+++ b/guests/vars/mappings.yml
@@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ mappings:
deb: librbd-dev
rpm: librbd-devel
CentOS7: librbd1-devel
+ mipsel-deb:
+ mipsel-Debian9: librbd-dev
+ mipsel-Debian10: librbd-dev
cross-policy-deb: foreign
libselinux:
--
2.24.1
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
5:49 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH 2/2] mappings: Remove librbd from Debian on mipsel going forward
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 11:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects
> sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so
> just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly.
IIRC, rbd upstream dropped support for any 32-bit architecture, so
I wouldn't be surprised if this disappears from other arches too.
We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. As of today,
https://packages.debian.org/sid/librbd-dev
shows that quite a few 32-bit architectures are still supported, at
least as far as Debian is concerned.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
6:08 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH 2/2] mappings: Remove librbd from Debian on mipsel going forward
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:49:28PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 11:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects
> > sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so
> > just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly.
>
> IIRC, rbd upstream dropped support for any 32-bit architecture, so
> I wouldn't be surprised if this disappears from other arches too.
We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. As of today,
https://packages.debian.org/sid/librbd-dev
shows that quite a few 32-bit architectures are still supported, at
least as far as Debian is concerned.
Looking again at Fedora it seems upstream dropped support long ago but
Fedora kept building until we hit a problem with compilers running out
of address space. If Debian is cross compiling from a 64bit machine
they'd avoid this. So anyway
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
1808
days inactive
1808
days old
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Andrea Bolognani -
Daniel P. Berrangé