[libvirt] [jenkins-ci PATCH 0/2] Fixes necessary for buildenv-libvirt-debian-sid-cross-mipsel
The latest container build failed; this series addresses the underlying issue. Andrea Bolognani (2): mappings: Refactor librbd mapping mappings: Remove librbd from Debian on mipsel going forward guests/vars/mappings.yml | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.24.1
All RPM-based distributions except for CentOS 7 use the same name. Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- guests/vars/mappings.yml | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/guests/vars/mappings.yml b/guests/vars/mappings.yml index 69750ad..ac2ae58 100644 --- a/guests/vars/mappings.yml +++ b/guests/vars/mappings.yml @@ -398,10 +398,8 @@ mappings: librbd: deb: librbd-dev - Fedora: librbd-devel + rpm: librbd-devel CentOS7: librbd1-devel - CentOS8: librbd-devel - OpenSUSE: librbd-devel cross-policy-deb: foreign libselinux: -- 2.24.1
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:18PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
All RPM-based distributions except for CentOS 7 use the same name.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- guests/vars/mappings.yml | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly. Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- guests/vars/mappings.yml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/guests/vars/mappings.yml b/guests/vars/mappings.yml index ac2ae58..1d8d1e0 100644 --- a/guests/vars/mappings.yml +++ b/guests/vars/mappings.yml @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ mappings: deb: librbd-dev rpm: librbd-devel CentOS7: librbd1-devel + mipsel-deb: + mipsel-Debian9: librbd-dev + mipsel-Debian10: librbd-dev cross-policy-deb: foreign libselinux: -- 2.24.1
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly.
IIRC, rbd upstream dropped support for any 32-bit architecture, so I wouldn't be surprised if this disappears from other arches too.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- guests/vars/mappings.yml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guests/vars/mappings.yml b/guests/vars/mappings.yml index ac2ae58..1d8d1e0 100644 --- a/guests/vars/mappings.yml +++ b/guests/vars/mappings.yml @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ mappings: deb: librbd-dev rpm: librbd-devel CentOS7: librbd1-devel + mipsel-deb: + mipsel-Debian9: librbd-dev + mipsel-Debian10: librbd-dev cross-policy-deb: foreign
libselinux: -- 2.24.1
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 11:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly.
IIRC, rbd upstream dropped support for any 32-bit architecture, so I wouldn't be surprised if this disappears from other arches too.
We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. As of today, https://packages.debian.org/sid/librbd-dev shows that quite a few 32-bit architectures are still supported, at least as far as Debian is concerned. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:49:28PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 11:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly.
IIRC, rbd upstream dropped support for any 32-bit architecture, so I wouldn't be surprised if this disappears from other arches too.
We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. As of today,
https://packages.debian.org/sid/librbd-dev
shows that quite a few 32-bit architectures are still supported, at least as far as Debian is concerned.
Looking again at Fedora it seems upstream dropped support long ago but Fedora kept building until we hit a problem with compilers running out of address space. If Debian is cross compiling from a 64bit machine they'd avoid this. So anyway Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
participants (2)
-
Andrea Bolognani -
Daniel P. Berrangé