[libvirt] [PATCH] remote: Fix memory leak

From: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com> Detected in valgrind run: ==9184== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 19 ==9184== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==9184== by 0x3073715F78: xdr_array (xdr_array.c:97) ==9184== by 0x4CF97C9: xdr_remote_domain_get_security_label_ret (remote_protocol.c:1696) ==9184== by 0x4D08741: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286) ==9184== by 0x4D00F78: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318) ==9184== by 0x4CE3887: call (remote_driver.c:3933) ==9184== by 0x4CF71C6: remoteDomainGetSecurityLabel (remote_driver.c:1580) ==9184== by 0x4CCA480: virDomainGetSecurityLabel (libvirt.c:7340) ==9184== by 0x41993A: cmdDominfo (virsh.c:2414) ==9184== by 0x411E92: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12730) ==9184== by 0x4211ED: main (virsh.c:14076) ==9184== ==9184== 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 19 ==9184== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==9184== by 0x3073715F78: xdr_array (xdr_array.c:97) ==9184== by 0x4CF974F: xdr_remote_node_get_security_model_ret (remote_protocol.c:1713) ==9184== by 0x4D08741: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286) ==9184== by 0x4D00F78: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318) ==9184== by 0x4CE3887: call (remote_driver.c:3933) ==9184== by 0x4CF6F96: remoteNodeGetSecurityModel (remote_driver.c:1648) ==9184== by 0x4CBF799: virNodeGetSecurityModel (libvirt.c:7382) ==9184== by 0x4197D7: cmdDominfo (virsh.c:2394) ==9184== by 0x411E92: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12730) ==9184== by 0x4211ED: main (virsh.c:14076) ==9184== ==9184== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 19 ==9184== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==9184== by 0x3073715F78: xdr_array (xdr_array.c:97) ==9184== by 0x4CF9729: xdr_remote_node_get_security_model_ret (remote_protocol.c:1710) ==9184== by 0x4D08741: virNetMessageDecodePayload (virnetmessage.c:286) ==9184== by 0x4D00F78: virNetClientProgramCall (virnetclientprogram.c:318) ==9184== by 0x4CE3887: call (remote_driver.c:3933) ==9184== by 0x4CF6F96: remoteNodeGetSecurityModel (remote_driver.c:1648) ==9184== by 0x4CBF799: virNodeGetSecurityModel (libvirt.c:7382) ==9184== by 0x4197D7: cmdDominfo (virsh.c:2394) ==9184== by 0x411E92: vshCommandRun (virsh.c:12730) ==9184== by 0x4211ED: main (virsh.c:14076) ==9184== ==9184== LEAK SUMMARY: ==9184== definitely lost: 11 bytes in 3 blocks * src/remote/remote_driver.c: Avoid leak on remoteDomainGetSecurityLabel and remoteNodeGetSecurityModel. --- src/remote/remote_driver.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/remote/remote_driver.c b/src/remote/remote_driver.c index 8dff6a8..5c0457e 100644 --- a/src/remote/remote_driver.c +++ b/src/remote/remote_driver.c @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ remoteDomainGetSecurityLabel (virDomainPtr domain, virSecurityLabelPtr seclabel) if (strlen (ret.label.label_val) >= sizeof seclabel->label) { remoteError(VIR_ERR_RPC, _("security label exceeds maximum: %zd"), sizeof seclabel->label - 1); - goto done; + goto cleanup; } strcpy (seclabel->label, ret.label.label_val); seclabel->enforcing = ret.enforcing; @@ -1595,6 +1595,9 @@ remoteDomainGetSecurityLabel (virDomainPtr domain, virSecurityLabelPtr seclabel) rv = 0; +cleanup: + xdr_free((xdrproc_t) xdr_remote_domain_get_security_label_ret, (char *)&ret); + done: remoteDriverUnlock(priv); return rv; @@ -1655,7 +1658,7 @@ remoteNodeGetSecurityModel (virConnectPtr conn, virSecurityModelPtr secmodel) if (strlen (ret.model.model_val) >= sizeof secmodel->model) { remoteError(VIR_ERR_RPC, _("security model exceeds maximum: %zd"), sizeof secmodel->model - 1); - goto done; + goto cleanup; } strcpy (secmodel->model, ret.model.model_val); } @@ -1664,13 +1667,16 @@ remoteNodeGetSecurityModel (virConnectPtr conn, virSecurityModelPtr secmodel) if (strlen (ret.doi.doi_val) >= sizeof secmodel->doi) { remoteError(VIR_ERR_RPC, _("security doi exceeds maximum: %zd"), sizeof secmodel->doi - 1); - goto done; + goto cleanup; } strcpy (secmodel->doi, ret.doi.doi_val); } rv = 0; +cleanup: + xdr_free((xdrproc_t) xdr_remote_node_get_security_model_ret, (char *)&ret); + done: remoteDriverUnlock(priv); return rv; -- 1.7.1

On 07/10/2011 11:14 PM, ajia@redhat.com wrote:
From: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
Detected in valgrind run:
==9184== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 19 ==9184== at 0x4A04A28: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==9184== by 0x3073715F78: xdr_array (xdr_array.c:97) ==9184== by 0x4CF97C9: xdr_remote_domain_get_security_label_ret (remote_protocol.c:1696)
* src/remote/remote_driver.c: Avoid leak on remoteDomainGetSecurityLabel and remoteNodeGetSecurityModel. --- src/remote/remote_driver.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
ACK and pushed. I added you to AUTHORS; let me know if I need to adjust anything for your preferred spellings. -- Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
participants (2)
-
ajia@redhat.com
-
Eric Blake