On 05/06/2014 01:40 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com&gt; > --- > libvirt.spec.in | 9 ++------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in > index aeccf4f..84d5bf3 100644 > --- a/libvirt.spec.in > +++ b/libvirt.spec.in > @@ -262,16 +262,11 @@ > %endif > > # Enable sanlock library for lock management with QEMU > -# Sanlock is available only on i686 x86_64 for RHEL > +# Sanlock is available only on x86_64 for RHEL > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 16 > %define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:%{server_drivers}} > %endif > -%if 0%{?rhel} == 6 > - %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 > - %define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:%{server_drivers}} > - %endif > -%endif > -%if 0%{?rhel} >= 7 > +%if 0%{?rhel} >= 6 > %ifarch x86_64 > %define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:%{server_drivers}} > %endif The only real change you are making here is that you are crippling sanlock for ix86 on RHEL 6 (RHEL 7 is unchanged). Meanwhile, I compared to the spec file that shipped with RHEL 6.5: # Sanlock is available only on x86_64 for RHEL-6 on all arches after that %if 0%{?fedora} >= 16 %define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:%{server_drivers}} %endif %if 0%{?rhel} == 6 %ifarch x86_64 %define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:%{server_drivers}} %endif %endif %if 0%{?rhel} >= 7 %define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:%{server_drivers}} %endif which enabled sanlock only on x86_64 for RHEL 6, and unconditionally enables it for RHEL 7. Then when you look at the current RHEL 7 beta product line, it is not built for ix86, only x86_64. So your formulation is shorter and appears to accomplish the same limitations, as well as having the benefit of matching what downstream already changed. ACK.