[PATCH v2] news: introduce memory failure event
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com> --- NEWS.rst | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/NEWS.rst b/NEWS.rst index d0454b7840..428928e80b 100644 --- a/NEWS.rst +++ b/NEWS.rst @@ -13,6 +13,16 @@ v6.9.0 (unreleased) * **New features** + * Introduce memory failure event + + Libvirt could handle domain's memory failure event. Drivers need to + implement their own method. + + * qemu: Implement memory failure event + + New event is implemented that is emitted whenever a guest encounters a + memory failure. + * qemu: Implement support for ``<transient/>`` disks VMs based on the QEMU hypervisor now can use ``<transient/>`` option for -- 2.11.0
On 10/23/20 3:53 PM, zhenwei pi wrote:
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com> --- NEWS.rst | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/NEWS.rst b/NEWS.rst index d0454b7840..428928e80b 100644 --- a/NEWS.rst +++ b/NEWS.rst @@ -13,6 +13,16 @@ v6.9.0 (unreleased)
* **New features**
+ * Introduce memory failure event + + Libvirt could handle domain's memory failure event. Drivers need to + implement their own method.
In my opinion this is unnecessary. The target audience of this file is users, not developers so much. Therefore, the second sentence does not add much value, because: a) users don't know how to implement that (unless an user is also a developer), b) by this time, users should be used to our driver model and the fact that some drivers implement a feature that other drivers don't (yet).
+ + * qemu: Implement memory failure event + + New event is implemented that is emitted whenever a guest encounters a + memory failure. +
ACK to this hunk and pushed. Thanks for handling this. Michal
participants (2)
-
Michal Privoznik -
zhenwei pi