2:55 p.m.
Hello,
I'm having problems to compile libvirt with opennebula driver.
I executed: ./autogen.sh --with-one
and got the following message:
configure: error: You must install XMLRPC-C >= 1.14.0 to compile libvirt ONE
driver
but I already have installed libxmlrpc version 1.16.07-1
Where to configure this? I've tried to set the environment variables
XMLRPC_CFLAGS and XMLRPC_LIBS, but nothing has changed.
So I've tried to change these variables directly on configure script, that
was empty, then errors started to appear on make execution:
../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_one.a(libvirt_driver_one_la-one_client.o): In
function `c_oneFree':
/home/objectweb/git/libvirt/src/./opennebula/one_client.c:207: undefined
reference to `xmlrpc_env_clean'
/home/objectweb/git/libvirt/src/./opennebula/one_client.c:208: undefined
reference to `xmlrpc_client_cleanup'
../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_one.a(libvirt_driver_one_la-one_client.o): In
function `c_oneReturnCode':
/home/objectweb/git/libvirt/src/./opennebula/one_client.c:49: undefined
reference to `xmlrpc_decompose_value'
.....etc...
What am I doing wrong??
Thanks,
Henrique Teófilo
3:07 a.m.
Henrique Teófilo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having problems to compile libvirt with opennebula driver.
I executed: ./autogen.sh --with-one
and got the following message:
configure: error: You must install XMLRPC-C >= 1.14.0 to compile libvirt
ONE driver
You have to install the xmlrpc-c development package. On Fedora it's called
"xmlrpc-c-devel"; it might be called something different on your distro.
--
Chris Lalancette
3:37 a.m.
2009/8/6 Chris Lalancette <clalance(a)redhat.com>:
Henrique Teófilo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems to compile libvirt with opennebula driver.
>
> I executed: ./autogen.sh --with-one
> and got the following message:
> configure: error: You must install XMLRPC-C >= 1.14.0 to compile libvirt
> ONE driver
You have to install the xmlrpc-c development package. On Fedora it's called
"xmlrpc-c-devel"; it might be called something different on your distro.
--
Chris Lalancette
Well, the basic problem seems to be that xmlrpc-c by itself doesn't
provide a .pc file for pkg-config, but has its own script for this
task called xmlrpc-c-config:
xmlrpc-c-config client --cflags
xmlrpc-c-config client --libs
So, Fedora seems to provide an .pc file for xmlrpc-c so that this
works on Fedora:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XMLRPC, xmlrpc_client >= $XMLRPC_REQUIRED, ...)
But other distros don't provide a .pc or only provide an old version
of xmlrpc-c, like Ubuntu. Ubuntu only provides 1.06 without an
additional .pc file. So I build 1.17 from source, but that doesn't
help as there is no .pc file for xmlrpc-c.
I think the check in configure.in should be changed to use
xmlrpc-c-config instead of pkg-config.
Matthias
5:25 a.m.
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:37:57AM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
Well, the basic problem seems to be that xmlrpc-c by itself
doesn't
provide a .pc file for pkg-config, but has its own script for this
task called xmlrpc-c-config:
xmlrpc-c-config client --cflags
xmlrpc-c-config client --libs
Okay
So, Fedora seems to provide an .pc file for xmlrpc-c so that this
works on Fedora:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XMLRPC, xmlrpc_client >= $XMLRPC_REQUIRED, ...)
But other distros don't provide a .pc or only provide an old version
of xmlrpc-c, like Ubuntu. Ubuntu only provides 1.06 without an
additional .pc file. So I build 1.17 from source, but that doesn't
help as there is no .pc file for xmlrpc-c.
I think the check in configure.in should be changed to use
xmlrpc-c-config instead of pkg-config.
Hum, yes if the .pc is not upstream, that's logical, though IMHO
it's probably time better spent to try to get a .pc in xmlrpc-c
upstream.
And then add a xmlrpc-c-config based check in configure.in if
PKG_CHECK_MODULES fails.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
4:39 p.m.
Ok, I created a .pc file with the output of xmlrpc-c-config (now pkg-config
xmlrpc_client --libs --cflags is OK). The error occurs not in configure
execution, but in make execution as a linking error like that:
undefined reference to `xmlrpc_client_call
and several others similar (as I said in the first message)
I have installed the latest version of xmlrpc compiled from source.
Any idea?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Daniel Veillard <veillard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:37:57AM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> Well, the basic problem seems to be that xmlrpc-c by itself doesn't
> provide a .pc file for pkg-config, but has its own script for this
> task called xmlrpc-c-config:
>
> xmlrpc-c-config client --cflags
> xmlrpc-c-config client --libs
Okay
> So, Fedora seems to provide an .pc file for xmlrpc-c so that this
> works on Fedora:
>
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XMLRPC, xmlrpc_client >= $XMLRPC_REQUIRED, ...)
>
> But other distros don't provide a .pc or only provide an old version
> of xmlrpc-c, like Ubuntu. Ubuntu only provides 1.06 without an
> additional .pc file. So I build 1.17 from source, but that doesn't
> help as there is no .pc file for xmlrpc-c.
>
> I think the check in configure.in should be changed to use
> xmlrpc-c-config instead of pkg-config.
Hum, yes if the .pc is not upstream, that's logical, though IMHO
it's probably time better spent to try to get a .pc in xmlrpc-c
upstream.
And then add a xmlrpc-c-config based check in configure.in if
PKG_CHECK_MODULES fails.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
5586
days inactive
5587
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Chris Lalancette -
Daniel Veillard -
Henrique Teófilo -
Matthias Bolte