On 9/27/19 5:33 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 9/26/19 10:56 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413(a)gmail.com>
> ---
>
> I've made this test file to make sure I wasn't messing
> up with the logic at patch 8. The idea of having this
> test seems okay, but probably I could do it shorter/cleaner.
>
> Feel free to discard it if it's not applicable or
> unnecessary. Adding this new file make the whole patch series,
> aimed at reduce code repetition and lines of code, add more
> lines than before. The irony is real.
>
It will reduce lines if you fold the data.entityName = X bit into the
TEST_ calls, passing the string value as the first argument for example
Got it.
We don't have a ton of fine grained unittesting like this in libvirt,
but it doesn't hurt. Though in this case it seems kinda overkill IMO
to call it for possible combo that it's used in. I think it's better
to just call it in all the invocations to give full code coverage. If
we want to test the individual driver usage of the function then we
would want to find a way to test those entry points directly IMO.
Maybe others have opinions.
Do you mean we should just test the actual usage of the function in the code
instead of testing all possible fail scenarios? For example, the code
does not
call virConnectValidateURIPath("/system", X , false) anywhere, so it's ok
to
not test them since it's not being exercised anyway - otherwise we're
entering TDD territory (which I don't mind - kind of a fan TBH), testing all
possible stuff just for sake of testing.
Is that what you're saying? I'm fine with it, and it will cut a good
chunk of
lines in this file too.
I'll let you decide what to do for v2 though
Thanks for the review. I'll wait to see if more people want to join in this
discussion before sending the v2.
DHB
- Cole
>
> tests/Makefile.am | 7 +-
> tests/virdriverconnvalidatetest.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/virdriverconnvalidatetest.c
>
> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am
> index d88ad7f686..c7f563d24d 100644
> --- a/tests/Makefile.am
> +++ b/tests/Makefile.am
> @@ -433,7 +433,8 @@ test_scripts += $(libvirtd_test_scripts)
> test_programs += \
> eventtest \
> - virdrivermoduletest
> + virdrivermoduletest \
> + virdriverconnvalidatetest
> else ! WITH_LIBVIRTD
> EXTRA_DIST += $(libvirtd_test_scripts)
> endif ! WITH_LIBVIRTD
> @@ -1485,6 +1486,10 @@ if WITH_LIBVIRTD
> virdrivermoduletest_SOURCES = \
> virdrivermoduletest.c testutils.h testutils.c
> virdrivermoduletest_LDADD = $(LDADDS)
> +
> +virdriverconnvalidatetest_SOURCES = \
> + virdriverconnvalidatetest.c testutils.h testutils.c
> +virdriverconnvalidatetest_LDADD = $(LDADDS)
> endif WITH_LIBVIRTD
> if WITH_LIBVIRTD
> diff --git a/tests/virdriverconnvalidatetest.c
> b/tests/virdriverconnvalidatetest.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..599150dc08
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/virdriverconnvalidatetest.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 IBM Corporation
> + *
> + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
> + * Lesser General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + * License along with this library. If not, see
> + * <
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +#include <config.h>
> +
> +#include "testutils.h"
> +#include "virerror.h"
> +#include "viralloc.h"
> +#include "virlog.h"
> +#include "driver.h"
> +
> +#define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE
> +
> +VIR_LOG_INIT("tests.driverconnvalidatetest");
> +
> +struct testDriverConnValidateData {
> + const char *uriPath;
> + const char *entityName;
> + bool privileged;
> + bool expectFailure;
> +};
> +
> +
> +static int testDriverConnValidate(const void *args)
> +{
> + const struct testDriverConnValidateData *data = args;
> +
> + bool ret = virConnectValidateURIPath(data->uriPath,
> + data->entityName,
> + data->privileged);
> + if (data->expectFailure)
> + ret = !ret;
> +
> + return ret ? 0 : -1;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int
> +mymain(void)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct testDriverConnValidateData data;
> +
> +#define TEST_SUCCESS(name) \
> + do { \
> + data.expectFailure = false; \
> + if (virTestRun("Test conn URI path validate ok " name, \
> + testDriverConnValidate, &data) < 0) \
> + ret = -1; \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define TEST_FAIL(name) \
> + do { \
> + data.expectFailure = true; \
> + if (virTestRun("Test conn URI path validate fail " name, \
> + testDriverConnValidate, &data) < 0) \
> + ret = -1; \
> + } while (0)
> +
> + /* Validation should always succeed with privileged user
> + * and '/system' URI path
> + */
> + data.uriPath = "/system";
> + data.privileged = true;
> +
> + data.entityName = "interface";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("interface privileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "network";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("network privileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "nodedev";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("nodedev privileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "secret";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("secret privileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "storage";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("storage privileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "qemu";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("qemu privileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "vbox";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("vbox privileged /system");
> +
> + /* Fail URI path validation for all '/system' path with
> + * unprivileged user
> + */
> + data.privileged = false;
> +
> + data.entityName = "interface";
> + TEST_FAIL("interface unprivileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "network";
> + TEST_FAIL("network unprivileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "nodedev";
> + TEST_FAIL("nodedev unprivileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "secret";
> + TEST_FAIL("secret unprivileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "storage";
> + TEST_FAIL("storage unprivileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "qemu";
> + TEST_FAIL("qemu unprivileged /system");
> +
> + data.entityName = "vbox";
> + TEST_FAIL("vbox unprivileged /system");
> +
> + /* Validation should always succeed with unprivileged user
> + * and '/session' URI path
> + */
> + data.uriPath = "/session";
> +
> + data.entityName = "interface";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("interface privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "network";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("network privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "nodedev";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("nodedev privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "secret";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("secret privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "storage";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("storage privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "qemu";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("qemu privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "vbox";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("vbox privileged /session");
> +
> + /* Fail URI path validation for all '/session' path with
> + * privileged user
> + */
> + data.privileged = true;
> +
> + data.entityName = "interface";
> + TEST_FAIL("interface privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "network";
> + TEST_FAIL("network privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "nodedev";
> + TEST_FAIL("nodedev privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "secret";
> + TEST_FAIL("secret privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "storage";
> + TEST_FAIL("storage privileged /session");
> +
> + /* ... except with qemu and vbox, where root can connect
> + * with both /system and /session
> + */
> + data.entityName = "qemu";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("qemu privileged /session");
> +
> + data.entityName = "vbox";
> + TEST_SUCCESS("vbox privileged /session");
> +
> + return ret == 0 ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE;
> +}
> +
> +VIR_TEST_MAIN(mymain)
>
- Cole