On 6/20/19 8:51 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
Change the example and add a recommendation to use disk target
rather
than path.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>
---
docs/formatsnapshot.html.in | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in b/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in
index 1bbbf06205..a19e91b4d5 100644
--- a/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@
<dd>This sub-element describes the snapshot properties of a
specific disk. The attribute <code>name</code> is
mandatory, and must match either the <code><target
- dev='name'/></code> or an unambiguous
<code><source
- file='name'/></code> of one of
+ dev='name'/></code> (recommended) or an unambiguous
+ <code><source file='name'/></code> of one
of
I like it. I also know that for checkpoints, you wanted me to ONLY
accept the disk target name rather than copying the snapshot practice of
also supporting a file name. This gives me a stronger reason to follow
up with that request.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:
qemu.org |
libvirt.org