11:08 a.m.
Hi all,
I'm investigating the ways to improve the live migration performance in
libvirt. I have a question about the vm live storage migration. the
platform is libvirt + qemu + kvm
If we want to migrate a running vm with its virtual disk images to another
node.
we can use 'virsh migrate ....' commands.
What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots? In the
current version, how can live migrate this vm?
Is it possible to blockcommit the snapshots to the base image and later
perform the migration, without shutting down the running vm?
Or is it possible to iteratively transfer all the snapshots to the
destination and later live migrate only the latest new data?
Thanks in advance.
Best,
Ed
11:52 a.m.
On 02/11/2015 10:08 AM, Edward Young wrote:
Hi all,
[probably didn't need to cross-post to quite that wide of an audience,
oh well]
I'm investigating the ways to improve the live migration performance in
libvirt. I have a question about the vm live storage migration. the
platform is libvirt + qemu + kvm
If we want to migrate a running vm with its virtual disk images to another
node.
we can use 'virsh migrate ....' commands.
What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots? In the
current version, how can live migrate this vm?
Are the snapshots based on shared storage, or local-only storage?
If I understand your question correctly, you are starting with this
situation:
base <- mid <- active
and want to make sure that on the destination, the guest still sees the
same contents as 'active' on the source, whether or not the destination
still sees a backing chain or just one file.
Is it possible to blockcommit the snapshots to the base image and later
perform the migration, without shutting down the running vm?
Yes, but that may not be the fastest solution. That is, you would be
going from:
base <- mid <- active
to
base'
where base' is the active image containing all the committed state, then
migrate that file. If base is not shared, that means qemu has to
migrate the entire disk state. And you also no longer have the external
snapshots to revert to on the destination.
Or is it possible to iteratively transfer all the snapshots to the
destination and later live migrate only the latest new data?
Yes, that works too, and is probably faster, especially if you have
out-of-band means for sharing read-only state between source and
destination.
In fact, if you can create yet another (temporary) external snapshot,
but this time on shared storage, and have storage backends that let you
instantly remap backing files to be visible into the destination, then
it is as simple as:
create a snapshot with shared storage destination
base <- mid <- active(frozen) <- shared
copy base, mid, and active to the destination
live migrate using shared storage instead of doing storage migration
block-commit shared back into active
base <- mid <- active
where the shared storage only needs to hold as much disk state as
diverges during the time of the live migration.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
3:07 p.m.
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your reply! I have the follow up questions blew.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/11/2015 10:08 AM, Edward Young wrote:
> Hi all,
[probably didn't need to cross-post to quite that wide of an audience,
oh well]
>
> I'm investigating the ways to improve the live migration performance in
> libvirt. I have a question about the vm live storage migration. the
> platform is libvirt + qemu + kvm
>
> If we want to migrate a running vm with its virtual disk images to
another
> node.
> we can use 'virsh migrate ....' commands.
>
> What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots? In the
> current version, how can live migrate this vm?
Are the snapshots based on shared storage, or local-only storage?
Yes, I'm talking about the local-only storage.
If I understand your question correctly, you are starting with this
situation:
base <- mid <- active
and want to make sure that on the destination, the guest still sees the
same contents as 'active' on the source, whether or not the destination
still sees a backing chain or just one file.
>
> Is it possible to blockcommit the snapshots to the base image and later
> perform the migration, without shutting down the running vm?
Yes, but that may not be the fastest solution. That is, you would be
going from:
base <- mid <- active
to
base'
where base' is the active image containing all the committed state, then
migrate that file. If base is not shared, that means qemu has to
migrate the entire disk state. And you also no longer have the external
snapshots to revert to on the destination.
Yes, I agree with you. In this case, we need to migrate the entire disk
state. In this case, there is no snapshot involved. we just perform the
regular migration with 'virsh migrate....'. Is this correct?
>
> Or is it possible to iteratively transfer all the snapshots to the
> destination and later live migrate only the latest new data?
>
Yes, that works too, and is probably faster, especially if you have
out-of-band means for sharing read-only state between source and
destination.
My question is here. If we do not have any shared storage resource between
source and destination (eg. long distance VM migration), how can we migrate
the latest new data to the destination? we can copy the base, mid to
destination manually, then how can we migrate the active snapshot( new data
goes in)? I learned that drive_mirror in qemu is built to finish this, but
do not understand clearly. Could you elaborate for me, or provide an
example?
In fact, if you can create yet another (temporary) external snapshot,
but this time on shared storage, and have storage backends that let you
instantly remap backing files to be visible into the destination, then
it is as simple as:
create a snapshot with shared storage destination
base <- mid <- active(frozen) <- shared
copy base, mid, and active to the destination
live migrate using shared storage instead of doing storage migration
block-commit shared back into active
base <- mid <- active
where the shared storage only needs to hold as much disk state as
diverges during the time of the live migration.
Thanks a lot!
Ed
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
3:12 p.m.
On 02/11/2015 02:07 PM, Edward Young wrote:
>> What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots?
In the
>> current version, how can live migrate this vm?
>
> Are the snapshots based on shared storage, or local-only storage?
>
Yes, I'm talking about the local-only storage.
Okay, glad I guessed as much, then.
Yes, I agree with you. In this case, we need to migrate the entire disk
state. In this case, there is no snapshot involved. we just perform the
regular migration with 'virsh migrate....'. Is this correct?
Using 'virsh migrate --copy-storage-all' would indeed migrate the entire
disk, if you can't supply shared storage.
>> Or is it possible to iteratively transfer all the snapshots
to the
>> destination and later live migrate only the latest new data?
>>
>
> Yes, that works too, and is probably faster, especially if you have
> out-of-band means for sharing read-only state between source and
> destination.
>
My question is here. If we do not have any shared storage resource between
source and destination (eg. long distance VM migration), how can we migrate
the latest new data to the destination? we can copy the base, mid to
destination manually, then how can we migrate the active snapshot( new data
goes in)? I learned that drive_mirror in qemu is built to finish this, but
do not understand clearly. Could you elaborate for me, or provide an
example?
Use 'virsh migrate --copy-storage-inc' to migrate only the incremental
changes, which assumes that the destination can already see the same
read-only backing data that the source sees. In fact, modern
libvirt/qemu does this for you by setting up an NBD server on the
destination, doing a data mirror from the source into the destination
(so that you DO have shared storage, at least for the duration of the
migration), then doing the live migration, then tearing down the NBD
mirroring link.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
3:45 p.m.
Hi Eric,
Please see the blew:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/11/2015 02:07 PM, Edward Young wrote:
>>> What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots? In the
>>> current version, how can live migrate this vm?
>>
>> Are the snapshots based on shared storage, or local-only storage?
>>
>
> Yes, I'm talking about the local-only storage.
Okay, glad I guessed as much, then.
>
> Yes, I agree with you. In this case, we need to migrate the entire disk
> state. In this case, there is no snapshot involved. we just perform the
> regular migration with 'virsh migrate....'. Is this correct?
Using 'virsh migrate --copy-storage-all' would indeed migrate the entire
disk, if you can't supply shared storage.
>>> Or is it possible to iteratively transfer all the snapshots to the
>>> destination and later live migrate only the latest new data?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that works too, and is probably faster, especially if you have
>> out-of-band means for sharing read-only state between source and
>> destination.
>>
>
> My question is here. If we do not have any shared storage resource
between
> source and destination (eg. long distance VM migration), how can we
migrate
> the latest new data to the destination? we can copy the base, mid to
> destination manually, then how can we migrate the active snapshot( new
data
> goes in)? I learned that drive_mirror in qemu is built to finish this,
but
> do not understand clearly. Could you elaborate for me, or provide an
> example?
Use 'virsh migrate --copy-storage-inc' to migrate only the incremental
changes, which assumes that the destination can already see the same
read-only backing data that the source sees.
I perform a simple test, but failed.
In the source, I create: base <- mid <- active (2 snapshots, the active
one is the current one)
In order to migrate this vm to the destination, I manually copy both base
and mid to the destination, and put them in the sam e directory
/var/lib/libvirt/images/
Then I call the following commands:
'sudo virsh migrate --live --unsafe --verbose --copy-storage-inc vm1
qemu+ssh://192.168.1.3/system tcp://192.168.1.3'
The error I got is:
error: Requested operation is not valid: cannot migrate domain with 2
snapshots.
I do not know the reason for this.
In fact, modern
libvirt/qemu does this for you by setting up an NBD server on the
destination, doing a data mirror from the source into the destination
(so that you DO have shared storage, at least for the duration of the
migration), then doing the live migration, then tearing down the NBD
mirroring link.
Sounds interesting! Can you provide me an example or point me to a link
about how to use this function?
Sorry to take you so much time to answer my questions. I appreciate it
deeply. After I solve this issue, I will write a blog and share these
knowledge with other people.
Best,
Ed
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
3573
days inactive
3573
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Edward Young -
Eric Blake