[libvirt PATCH v2 00/12] tools: provide virt-qemu-sev-validate for SEV(-ES) launch attestation

The libvirt QEMU driver provides all the functionality required for launching a guest on AMD SEV(-ES) platforms, with a configuration that enables attestation of the launch measurement. The documentation for how to actually perform an attestation is severely lacking and not suitable for mere mortals to understand. IOW, someone trying to implement attestation is in for a world of pain and suffering. This series doesn't fix the documentation problem, but it does provide a reference implementation of a tool for performing attestation of SEV(-ES) guests in the context of libvirt / KVM. There will be other tools and libraries that implement attestation logic too, but this tool is likely somewhat unique in its usage of libvirt. Now for a attestation to be trustworthy you don't want to perform it on the hypervisor host, since the goal is to prove that the hypervisor has not acted maliciously. None the less it is still beneficial to have libvirt integration to some extent. When running this tool on a remote (trusted) host, it can connect to the libvirt hypervisor and fetch the data provided by the virDomainLaunchSecurityInfo API, which is safe to trust as the key pieces are cryptographically measured. Attestation is a complex problem though and it is very easy to screw up and feed the wrong information and then waste hours trying to figure out what piece was wrong, to cause the hash digest to change. For debugging such problems, you can thus tell the tool to operate insecurely, by querying libvirt for almost all of the configuration information required to determine the expected measurement. By comparing these results,to the results obtained in offline mode it helps narrow down where the mistake lies. So I view this tool as being useful in a number of ways: * Quality assurance engineers needing to test libvirt/QEMU/KVM get a simple and reliable tool for automating tests with. * Users running simple libvirt deployments without any large management stack, get a standalone tool for attestation they can rely on. * Developers writing/integrating attestation support into management stacks above libvirt, get a reference against which they can debug their own tools. * Users wanting to demonstrate the core SEV/SEV-ES functionality get a simple and reliable tool to illustrate the core concepts involved. Since I didn't fancy writing such complex logic in C, this tool is a python3 program. As such, we don't want to include it in the main libvirt-client RPM, nor any other existing RPM. THus, this series puts it in a new libvirt-client-qemu RPM which, through no co-inicidence at all, is the same RPM I invented a few days ago to hold the virt-qemu-qmp-proxy command. Note, people will have already seen an earlier version of this tool I hacked up some months ago. This code is very significantly changed since that earlier version, to make it more maintainable, and simpler to use (especially for SEV-ES) but the general theme is still the same. Changed in v2: - All the suggestions from Cole and Kashyap Daniel P. Berrangé (12): build-aux: only forbid gethostname in C files tools: support validating SEV firmware boot measurements tools: load guest config from libvirt tools: support validating SEV direct kernel boot measurements tools: load direct kernel config from libvirt tools: support validating SEV-ES initial vCPU state measurements tools: support automatically constructing SEV-ES vCPU state tools: load CPU count and CPU SKU from libvirt tools: support generating SEV secret injection tables docs/kbase: describe attestation for SEV guests scripts: add systemtap script for capturing SEV-ES VMSA docs/manpages: add checklist of problems for SEV attestation build-aux/syntax-check.mk | 1 + docs/kbase/launch_security_sev.rst | 105 ++ docs/manpages/meson.build | 1 + docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 647 +++++++++++ examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp | 48 + libvirt.spec.in | 2 + tools/meson.build | 5 + tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 1292 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 2101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst create mode 100644 examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp create mode 100755 tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate -- 2.37.3

This function is fine to use in other languages Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- build-aux/syntax-check.mk | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/build-aux/syntax-check.mk b/build-aux/syntax-check.mk index e35c2be734..8dc7495c45 100644 --- a/build-aux/syntax-check.mk +++ b/build-aux/syntax-check.mk @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ sc_prohibit_readlink: sc_prohibit_gethostname: @prohibit='gethostname *\(' \ + in_vc_files='\.[ch]$$' \ halt='use virGetHostname, not gethostname' \ $(_sc_search_regexp) -- 2.37.3

The virt-qemu-sev-validate program will compare a reported SEV/SEV-ES domain launch measurement, to a computed launch measurement. This determines whether the domain has been tampered with during launch. This initial implementation requires all inputs to be provided explicitly, and as such can run completely offline, without any connection to libvirt. The tool is placed in the libvirt-client-qemu sub-RPM since it is specific to the QEMU driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/meson.build | 1 + docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 207 ++++++++++++++++++ libvirt.spec.in | 2 + tools/meson.build | 5 + tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 263 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 478 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst create mode 100755 tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate diff --git a/docs/manpages/meson.build b/docs/manpages/meson.build index b5556996a4..84b2e247e9 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/meson.build +++ b/docs/manpages/meson.build @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ docs_man_files = [ { 'name': 'virt-qemu-run', 'section': '1', 'install': conf.has('WITH_QEMU') }, { 'name': 'virt-qemu-qmp-proxy', 'section': '1', 'install': conf.has('WITH_QEMU') }, { 'name': 'virt-xml-validate', 'section': '1', 'install': true }, + { 'name': 'virt-qemu-sev-validate', 'section': '1', 'install': conf.has('WITH_QEMU') }, { 'name': 'libvirt-guests', 'section': '8', 'install': conf.has('WITH_LIBVIRTD') }, { 'name': 'libvirtd', 'section': '8', 'install': conf.has('WITH_LIBVIRTD') }, diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..36de9becfd --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +====================== +virt-qemu-sev-validate +====================== + +-------------------------------------------- +validate a domain AMD SEV launch measurement +-------------------------------------------- + +:Manual section: 1 +:Manual group: Virtualization Support + +.. contents:: + +SYNOPSIS +======== + + +``virt-qemu-sev-validate`` [*OPTIONS*] + + +DESCRIPTION +=========== + +This program validates the reported measurement for a domain launched with AMD +SEV. If the program exits with a status of zero, the guest owner can be +confident that their guest OS is running under the protection offered by the +SEV / SEV-ES platform. + +Note that the level of protection varies depending on the AMD SEV platform +generation and describing the differences is outside the scope of this +document. + +For the results of this program to be considered trustworthy, it is required to +be run on a machine that is already trusted by the guest owner. This could be a +machine that the guest owner has direct physical control over, or it could be +another virtual machine protected by AMD SEV that has already had its launch +measurement validated. Running this program on the virtualization host will not +produce an answer that can be trusted. + +OPTIONS +======= + +Common options +-------------- + +``-h``, ``--help`` + +Display command line help usage then exit. + +``-d``, ``--debug`` + +Show debug information while running + +``-q``, ``--quiet`` + +Don't print information about the attestation result. + +Guest state options +------------------- + +These options provide information about the state of the guest that needs its +boot attested. + +``--measurement BASE64-STRING`` + +The launch measurement reported by the hypervisor of the domain to be validated. +The measurement must be 48 bytes of binary data encoded as a base64 string. + +``--api-major VERSION`` + +The SEV API major version of the hypervisor the domain is running on. + +``--api-minor VERSION`` + +The SEV API major version of the hypervisor the domain is running on. + +``--build-id ID`` + +The SEV build ID of the hypervisor the domain is running on. + +``--policy POLiCY`` + +The policy bitmask associated with the session launch data of the domain to be +validated. + +Guest config options +-------------------- + +These options provide items needed to calculate the expected domain launch +measurement. This will then be compared to the reported launch measurement. + +``-f PATH``, ``--firmware=PATH`` + +Path to the firmware loader binary. This is the EDK2 build that knows how to +initialize AMD SEV. For the validation to be trustworthy it important that the +firmware build used has no support for loading non-volatile variables from +NVRAM, even if NVRAM is expose to the guest. + +``--tik PATH`` + +TIK file for domain. This file must be exactly 16 bytes in size and contains the +unique transport integrity key associated with the domain session launch data. +This is mutually exclusive with the ``--tk`` argument. + +``--tek PATH`` + +TEK file for domain. This file must be exactly 16 bytes in size and contains the +unique transport encryption key associated with the domain session launch data. +This is mutually exclusive with the ``--tk`` argument. + +``--tek PATH`` + +TEK/TIK combined file for the domain. This file must be exactly 32 bytes in +size, with the first 16 bytes containing the TEK and the last 16 bytes +containing the TIK. This is mutually exclusive with the ``--tik`` and ``--tek`` +arguments. + +EXAMPLES +======== + +Fully offline execution +----------------------- + +This scenario allows a measurement to be securely validated in a completely +offline state without any connection to the hypervisor host. All required +data items must be provided as command line parameters. This usage model is +considered secure, because all input data is provided by the user. + +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: + +:: + + # virt-qemu-sev-validate \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --measurement Zs2pf19ubFSafpZ2WKkwquXvACx9Wt/BV+eJwQ/taO8jhyIj/F8swFrybR1fZ2ID \ + --api-major 0 \ + --api-minor 24 \ + --build-id 13 \ + --policy 3 + +EXIT STATUS +=========== + +Upon successful attestation of the launch measurement, an exit status of 0 will +be set. + +Upon failure to attest the launch measurement one of the following codes will +be set: + +* **1** - *Guest measurement did not validate* + + Assuming the inputs to this program are correct, the virtual machine launch + has been compromised and it should not be trusted henceforth. + +* **2** - *Usage scenario cannot be supported* + + The way in which this program has been invoked prevent it from being able to + validate the launch measurement. + +* **3** - *unexpected error occurred in the code* + + A logic flaw in this program means it is unable to complete the validation of + the measurement. This is a bug which should be reported to the maintainers. + +AUTHOR +====== + +Daniel P. Berrangé + + +BUGS +==== + +Please report all bugs you discover. This should be done via either: + +#. the mailing list + + `https://libvirt.org/contact.html <https://libvirt.org/contact.html>`_ + +#. the bug tracker + + `https://libvirt.org/bugs.html <https://libvirt.org/bugs.html>`_ + +Alternatively, you may report bugs to your software distributor / vendor. + + +COPYRIGHT +========= + +Copyright (C) 2022 by Red Hat, Inc. + + +LICENSE +======= + +``virt-qemu-sev-validate`` is distributed under the terms of the GNU GPL v2+. +This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There +is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR +PURPOSE + + +SEE ALSO +======== + +virsh(1), `SEV launch security usage <https://libvirt.org/kbase/launch_security_sev.html>`_, +`https://www.libvirt.org/ <https://www.libvirt.org/>`_ diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index d946a8da48..5d04118667 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -2175,7 +2175,9 @@ exit 0 %if %{with_qemu} %files client-qemu %{_mandir}/man1/virt-qemu-qmp-proxy.1* +%{_mandir}/man1/virt-qemu-sev-validate.1* %{_bindir}/virt-qemu-qmp-proxy +%{_bindir}/virt-qemu-sev-validate %endif %files libs -f %{name}.lang diff --git a/tools/meson.build b/tools/meson.build index 20509906af..c41c619af4 100644 --- a/tools/meson.build +++ b/tools/meson.build @@ -299,6 +299,11 @@ if conf.has('WITH_SANLOCK') ) endif +if conf.has('WITH_QEMU') + install_data('virt-qemu-sev-validate', + install_dir: bindir) +endif + if conf.has('WITH_LIBVIRTD') configure_file( input: 'libvirt-guests.sh.in', diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate new file mode 100755 index 0000000000..c0837cc2c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ +#!/usr/bin/python3 +# +# SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later +# +# Validates a guest AMD SEV launch measurement +# +# A general principle in writing this tool is that it must calculate the +# expected measurement based entirely on information it receives on the CLI +# from the guest owner. +# +# It cannot generally trust information obtained from the guest XML or from the +# virtualization host OS. The main exceptions are: +# +# - The guest measurement +# +# This is a result of cryptographic operation using a shared secret known +# only to the guest owner and SEV platform, not the host OS. +# +# - The guest policy +# +# This is encoded in the launch session blob that is encrypted with a shared +# secret known only to the guest owner and SEV platform, not the host OS. It +# is impossible for the host OS to maliciously launch a guest with different +# policy and the user provided launch session blob. +# +# CAVEAT: the user must ALWAYS create a launch blob with freshly generated +# TIK/TEK for every new VM. Re-use of the same TIK/TEK for multiple VMs +# is insecure. +# +# - The SEV API version / build ID +# +# This does not have an impact on the security of the measurement, unless +# the guest owner needs a guarantee that the host is not using specific +# firmware versions with known flaws. +# + +import argparse +from base64 import b64decode +from hashlib import sha256 +import hmac +import logging +import sys +import traceback + +log = logging.getLogger() + + +class AttestationFailedException(Exception): + pass + + +class UnsupportedUsageException(Exception): + pass + + +class ConfidentialVM(object): + + def __init__(self, + measurement=None, + api_major=None, + api_minor=None, + build_id=None, + policy=None): + self.measurement = measurement + self.api_major = api_major + self.api_minor = api_minor + self.build_id = build_id + self.policy = policy + + self.firmware = None + self.tik = None + self.tek = None + + def load_tik_tek(self, tik_path, tek_path): + with open(tik_path, 'rb') as fh: + self.tik = fh.read() + log.debug("TIK(hex): %s", self.tik.hex()) + + if len(self.tik) != 16: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Expected 16 bytes in TIK file, but got %d" % len(self.tik)) + + with open(tek_path, 'rb') as fh: + self.tek = fh.read() + log.debug("TEK(hex): %s", self.tek.hex()) + + if len(self.tek) != 16: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Expected 16 bytes in TEK file, but got %d" % len(self.tek)) + + def load_tk(self, tk_path): + with open(tk_path, 'rb') as fh: + tk = fh.read() + + if len(tk) != 32: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Expected 32 bytes in TIK/TEK file, but got %d" % len(tk)) + + self.tek = tk[0:16] + self.tik = tk[16:32] + log.debug("TIK(hex): %s", self.tik.hex()) + log.debug("TEK(hex): %s", self.tek.hex()) + + def load_firmware(self, firmware_path): + with open(firmware_path, 'rb') as fh: + self.firmware = fh.read() + log.debug("Loader(sha256): %s", sha256(self.firmware).hexdigest()) + + # Get the full set of measured launch data for the domain + # + # The measured data that the guest is initialized with is the concatenation + # of the following: + # + # - The firmware blob + def get_measured_data(self): + measured_data = self.firmware + log.debug("Measured-data(sha256): %s", + sha256(measured_data).hexdigest()) + return measured_data + + # Get the reported and computed launch measurements for the domain + # + # AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization API , section 6.5: + # + # measurement = HMAC(0x04 || API_MAJOR || API_MINOR || BUILD || + # GCTX.POLICY || GCTX.LD || MNONCE; GCTX.TIK) + # + # Where GCTX.LD covers all the measured data the guest is initialized with + # per get_measured_data(). + def get_measurements(self): + measurement = b64decode(self.measurement) + reported = measurement[0:32] + nonce = measurement[32:48] + + measured_data = self.get_measured_data() + msg = ( + bytes([0x4]) + + self.api_major.to_bytes(1, 'little') + + self.api_minor.to_bytes(1, 'little') + + self.build_id.to_bytes(1, 'little') + + self.policy.to_bytes(4, 'little') + + sha256(measured_data).digest() + + nonce + ) + log.debug("Measured-msg(hex): %s", msg.hex()) + + computed = hmac.new(self.tik, msg, 'sha256').digest() + + log.debug("Measurement reported(hex): %s", reported.hex()) + log.debug("Measurement computed(hex): %s", computed.hex()) + + return reported, computed + + def attest(self): + reported, computed = self.get_measurements() + + if reported != computed: + raise AttestationFailedException( + "Measurement does not match, VM is not trustworthy") + + +def parse_command_line(): + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( + description='Validate guest AMD SEV launch measurement') + parser.add_argument('--debug', '-d', action='store_true', + help='Show debug information') + parser.add_argument('--quiet', '-q', action='store_true', + help='Do not display status') + + # Arguments related to the state of the launched guest + vmstate = parser.add_argument_group("Virtual machine launch state") + vmstate.add_argument('--measurement', '-m', required=True, + help='Measurement for the running domain') + vmstate.add_argument('--api-major', type=int, required=True, + help='SEV API major version for the running domain') + vmstate.add_argument('--api-minor', type=int, required=True, + help='SEV API major version for the running domain') + vmstate.add_argument('--build-id', type=int, required=True, + help='SEV build ID for the running domain') + vmstate.add_argument('--policy', type=int, required=True, + help='SEV policy for the running domain') + + # Arguments related to calculation of the expected launch measurement + vmconfig = parser.add_argument_group("Virtual machine config") + vmconfig.add_argument('--firmware', '-f', required=True, + help='Path to the firmware binary') + vmconfig.add_argument('--tik', + help='TIK file for domain') + vmconfig.add_argument('--tek', + help='TEK file for domain') + vmconfig.add_argument('--tk', + help='TEK/TIK combined file for domain') + + return parser.parse_args() + + +# Sanity check the set of CLI args specified provide enough info for us to do +# the job +def check_usage(args): + if args.tk is not None: + if args.tik is not None or args.tek is not None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "--tk is mutually exclusive with --tek/--tik") + else: + if args.tik is None or args.tek is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --tk or both of --tek/--tik are required") + + +def attest(args): + cvm = ConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, + api_major=args.api_major, + api_minor=args.api_minor, + build_id=args.build_id, + policy=args.policy) + + cvm.load_firmware(args.firmware) + + if args.tk is not None: + cvm.load_tk(args.tk) + else: + cvm.load_tik_tek(args.tik, args.tek) + + cvm.attest() + + if not args.quiet: + print("OK: Looks good to me") + +def main(): + args = parse_command_line() + if args.debug: + logging.basicConfig(level="DEBUG") + formatter = logging.Formatter("[%(levelname)s]: %(message)s") + handler = log.handlers[0] + handler.setFormatter(formatter) + + try: + check_usage(args) + + attest(args) + + sys.exit(0) + except AttestationFailedException as e: + if args.debug: + traceback.print_tb(e.__traceback__) + if not args.quiet: + print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) + sys.exit(1) + except UnsupportedUsageException as e: + if args.debug: + traceback.print_tb(e.__traceback__) + if not args.quiet: + print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) + sys.exit(2) + except Exception as e: + if args.debug: + traceback.print_tb(e.__traceback__) + if not args.quiet: + print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) + sys.exit(3) + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() -- 2.37.3

Accept information about a connection to libvirt and a guest on the command line. Talk to libvirt to obtain the running guest state and automatically detect as much configuration as possible. It will refuse to use a libvirt connection that is thought to be local to the current machine, as running this tool on the hypervisor itself is not considered secure. This can be overridden using the --insecure flag. When querying the guest, it will also analyse the XML configuration in an attempt to detect any options that are liable to be mistakes. For example the NVRAM being measured should not have a persistent varstore. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 109 +++++++++++- tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index 36de9becfd..2c02a27103 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ another virtual machine protected by AMD SEV that has already had its launch measurement validated. Running this program on the virtualization host will not produce an answer that can be trusted. +If told to connect to libvirt, it will refuse to use a libvirt connection that +is local to the machine, since that cannot be trusted. For the sake of testing +or demonstration purposes, however, it can be forced to run in this scenario +using the ``--insecure`` flag. The result will, of course, still not be +trustworthy. + OPTIONS ======= @@ -115,6 +121,41 @@ size, with the first 16 bytes containing the TEK and the last 16 bytes containing the TIK. This is mutually exclusive with the ``--tik`` and ``--tek`` arguments. +Libvirt options +--------------- + +These options are used when connecting to libvirt to automatically obtain +state and configuration information about the domain to be attested. + +``-c``, ``--connect URI`` + +Libvirt connection URI. For the validation to be trustworthy this must be a URI +resolving to a remote virtualization host. This requirement can be overridden +using the ``--insecure`` argument + +``-o``, ``--domain ID|NAME|UUID`` + +Domain ID, or domain name or domain UUID. Used to identify which libvirt domain +is to have its launch measured. The domain must be running, and would usually +have been started in a paused state, to allow validation to be performed before +guest CPUs begin execution. + +``-i``, ``--insecure`` + +Proceed even if usage scenario is known to be insecure. This allows the program +to connect to a local libvirt hypervisor and rely on file content from the +virtualization host. The result of the validation must not be trusted. + +``-g``, ``--ignore-config`` + +Do not attempt to sanity check the domain config. The default behaviour is to +print out errors if identifying configuration elements in the guest XML that +would invalidate the launch measurement. This can help the guest owner to +understand any configuration mistakes that have been made. If the +``--ignore-config`` argument is given, this sanity checking of configuration +will be skipped. The result is that the validation will likely be reported as +failed. + EXAMPLES ======== @@ -139,6 +180,46 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --build-id 13 \ --policy 3 +Fetch from remote libvirt +------------------------- + +This scenario allows fetching certain data from a remote hypervisor via a +connection to libvirt. It will aid in debugging by analysing the guest +configuration and reporting anything that could invalidate the measurement +of the guest. This usage model is considered secure, because the limited +information obtained from the untrusted hypervisor cannot be used to change +the result. + +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: + +:: + + # virt-qemu-sev-validate \ + --connect qemu+ssh://root@some.remote.host/system \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + +Fetch from local libvirt +------------------------ + +This scenario allows fetching all data from the local hypervisor via a +connection to libvirt. It is only to be used for the purpose of testing, +debugging, or demonstrations, because running on the local hypervisor is not +a secure scenario. To enable this usage, the ``--insecure`` flag must be +specified. Given a pointer to the libvirt guest to validate, all information +needed to perform a validation, except the TIK/TEK pair can be acquired +automatically. + +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: + +:: + + # virt-qemu-sev-validate \ + --insecure \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + EXIT STATUS =========== @@ -158,7 +239,33 @@ be set: The way in which this program has been invoked prevent it from being able to validate the launch measurement. -* **3** - *unexpected error occurred in the code* +* **3** - *Usage scenario is not secure* + + The way in which this program has been invoked means that the result of any + launch measurement validation will not be secure. + + The program can be reinvoked with ``--insecure`` argument to force a + validation, however, the results of this should not be trusted. This should + only be used for testing, debugging or demonstration purposes, never in a + production deployment. + +* **4** - *Domain has incorrect configuration to be measured* + + The way in which the guest has been configured prevent this program from being + able to validate the launch measurement. Note that in general the guest + configuration reported by the hypervisor is not trustworthy, so it is + possible this error could be a false positive designed to cause a denial of + service. + + This program can be reinvoked with the ``--ignore-config`` argument to skip + the sanity checks on the domain XML. This will likely result in it failing + with an exit code of **1** indicating the measurement is invalid + +* **5** - *Domain is in incorrect state to be measured* + + The domain has to be running in order to validate a launch measurement. + +* **6** - *unexpected error occurred in the code* A logic flaw in this program means it is unable to complete the validation of the measurement. This is a bug which should be reported to the maintainers. diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index c0837cc2c7..eb9485c6ed 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -39,9 +39,14 @@ from base64 import b64decode from hashlib import sha256 import hmac import logging +import re +import socket import sys import traceback +from lxml import etree +import libvirt + log = logging.getLogger() @@ -53,6 +58,18 @@ class UnsupportedUsageException(Exception): pass +class InsecureUsageException(Exception): + pass + + +class IncorrectConfigException(Exception): + pass + + +class InvalidStateException(Exception): + pass + + class ConfidentialVM(object): def __init__(self, @@ -159,6 +176,103 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): "Measurement does not match, VM is not trustworthy") +class LibvirtConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): + def __init__(self, **kwargs): + super().__init__(**kwargs) + + self.conn = None + self.dom = None + + def check_domain(self, doc, secure): + ls = doc.xpath("/domain/launchSecurity[@type='sev']") + if len(ls) != 1: + raise IncorrectConfigException( + "Domain is not configured with SEV launch security") + + dh = doc.xpath("/domain/launchSecurity[@type='sev']/dhCert") + if len(dh) != 1: + raise IncorrectConfigException( + "Domain must have SEV owner cert to validate measurement") + + session = doc.xpath("/domain/launchSecurity[@type='sev']/session") + if len(session) != 1: + raise IncorrectConfigException( + "Domain must have SEV session data to validate measurement") + + nvramnodes = doc.xpath("/domain/os/nvram") + if len(nvramnodes) != 0 and secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "Domain firmware with NVRAM cannot be securely measured") + + loadernodes = doc.xpath("/domain/os/loader") + if len(loadernodes) != 1: + raise IncorrectConfigException( + "Domain must have one firmware path") + + def load_domain(self, uri, id_name_uuid, secure, ignore_config): + self.conn = libvirt.open(uri) + + remote = socket.gethostname() != self.conn.getHostname() + if not remote and secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "running locally on the hypervisor host is not secure") + + if re.match(r'^\d+$', id_name_uuid): + self.dom = self.conn.lookupByID(int(id_name_uuid)) + elif re.match(r'^[-a-f0-9]+$', id_name_uuid): + self.dom = self.conn.lookupByUUIDString(id_name_uuid) + else: + self.dom = self.conn.lookupByName(id_name_uuid) + + log.debug("VM: id=%d name=%s uuid=%s", + self.dom.ID(), self.dom.name(), self.dom.UUIDString()) + + if not self.dom.isActive(): + raise InvalidStateException( + "Domain must be running to validate measurement") + + xml = self.dom.XMLDesc() + + doc = etree.fromstring(xml) + if not ignore_config: + self.check_domain(doc, secure) + + # See comments at top of file wrt why we are OK to trust the + # sev-api-major, sev-api-minor, sev-build-id and sev-policy data + # reported by the host + sevinfo = self.dom.launchSecurityInfo() + + if "sev-api-major" not in sevinfo: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "'api-major' not reported in domain launch security info") + + if self.measurement is None: + self.measurement = sevinfo["sev-measurement"] + if self.api_major is None: + self.api_major = sevinfo["sev-api-major"] + if self.api_minor is None: + self.api_minor = sevinfo["sev-api-minor"] + if self.build_id is None: + self.build_id = sevinfo["sev-build-id"] + if self.policy is None: + self.policy = sevinfo["sev-policy"] + + if self.firmware is None: + if remote: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Cannot access loader path remotely") + if secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "Using loader path from XML is not secure") + + loadernodes = doc.xpath("/domain/os/loader") + if len(loadernodes) == 0: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "--firmware not specified and not loader path found") + + self.load_firmware(loadernodes[0].text) + + def parse_command_line(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( description='Validate guest AMD SEV launch measurement') @@ -169,20 +283,20 @@ def parse_command_line(): # Arguments related to the state of the launched guest vmstate = parser.add_argument_group("Virtual machine launch state") - vmstate.add_argument('--measurement', '-m', required=True, + vmstate.add_argument('--measurement', '-m', help='Measurement for the running domain') - vmstate.add_argument('--api-major', type=int, required=True, + vmstate.add_argument('--api-major', type=int, help='SEV API major version for the running domain') - vmstate.add_argument('--api-minor', type=int, required=True, + vmstate.add_argument('--api-minor', type=int, help='SEV API major version for the running domain') - vmstate.add_argument('--build-id', type=int, required=True, + vmstate.add_argument('--build-id', type=int, help='SEV build ID for the running domain') - vmstate.add_argument('--policy', type=int, required=True, + vmstate.add_argument('--policy', type=int, help='SEV policy for the running domain') # Arguments related to calculation of the expected launch measurement vmconfig = parser.add_argument_group("Virtual machine config") - vmconfig.add_argument('--firmware', '-f', required=True, + vmconfig.add_argument('--firmware', '-f', help='Path to the firmware binary') vmconfig.add_argument('--tik', help='TIK file for domain') @@ -191,6 +305,17 @@ def parse_command_line(): vmconfig.add_argument('--tk', help='TEK/TIK combined file for domain') + # Arguments related to the connection to libvirt + vmconn = parser.add_argument_group("Libvirt guest connection") + vmconn.add_argument('--connect', '-c', default="qemu:///system", + help='libvirt connection URI') + vmconn.add_argument('--domain', '-o', + help='domain ID / Name / UUID') + vmconn.add_argument('--insecure', '-i', action='store_true', + help='Proceed even if usage scenario is insecure') + vmconn.add_argument('--ignore-config', '-g', action='store_true', + help='Do not attempt to sanity check the guest config') + return parser.parse_args() @@ -206,21 +331,60 @@ def check_usage(args): raise UnsupportedUsageException( "Either --tk or both of --tek/--tik are required") + if args.domain is None: + if args.measurement is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --measurement or --domain is required") + + if args.api_major is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --api-major or --domain is required") + + if args.api_minor is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --api-minor or --domain is required") + + if args.build_id is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --build-id or --domain is required") + + if args.policy is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --policy or --domain is required") + + if args.firmware is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --firmware or --domain is required") + def attest(args): - cvm = ConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, - api_major=args.api_major, - api_minor=args.api_minor, - build_id=args.build_id, - policy=args.policy) + if args.domain is None: + cvm = ConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, + api_major=args.api_major, + api_minor=args.api_minor, + build_id=args.build_id, + policy=args.policy) + else: + cvm = LibvirtConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, + api_major=args.api_major, + api_minor=args.api_minor, + build_id=args.build_id, + policy=args.policy) - cvm.load_firmware(args.firmware) + if args.firmware is not None: + cvm.load_firmware(args.firmware) if args.tk is not None: cvm.load_tk(args.tk) else: cvm.load_tik_tek(args.tik, args.tek) + if args.domain is not None: + cvm.load_domain(args.connect, + args.domain, + not args.insecure, + args.ignore_config) + cvm.attest() if not args.quiet: @@ -252,12 +416,24 @@ def main(): if not args.quiet: print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) sys.exit(2) + except InsecureUsageException as e: + if not args.quiet: + print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) + sys.exit(3) + except IncorrectConfigException as e: + if not args.quiet: + print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) + sys.exit(4) + except InvalidStateException as e: + if not args.quiet: + print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) + sys.exit(5) except Exception as e: if args.debug: traceback.print_tb(e.__traceback__) if not args.quiet: print("ERROR: %s" % e, file=sys.stderr) - sys.exit(3) + sys.exit(6) if __name__ == "__main__": main() -- 2.37.3

When doing direct kernel boot we need to include the kernel, initrd and cmdline in the measurement. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 43 ++++++++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index 2c02a27103..da804ae6a0 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -102,6 +102,20 @@ initialize AMD SEV. For the validation to be trustworthy it important that the firmware build used has no support for loading non-volatile variables from NVRAM, even if NVRAM is expose to the guest. +``-k PATH``, ``--kernel=PATH`` + +Path to the kernel binary if doing direct kernel boot. + +``-r PATH``, ``--initrd=PATH`` + +Path to the initrd binary if doing direct kernel boot. Defaults to zero length +content if omitted. + +``-e STRING``, ``--cmdline=STRING`` + +String containing any kernel command line parameters used during boot of the +domain. Defaults to the empty string if omitted. + ``--tik PATH`` TIK file for domain. This file must be exactly 16 bytes in size and contains the @@ -180,6 +194,22 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --build-id 13 \ --policy 3 +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --kernel vmlinuz-5.11.12 \ + --initrd initramfs-5.11.12 \ + --cmdline "root=/dev/vda1" \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --measurement Zs2pf19ubFSafpZ2WKkwquXvACx9Wt/BV+eJwQ/taO8jhyIj/F8swFrybR1fZ2ID \ + --api-major 0 \ + --api-minor 24 \ + --build-id 13 \ + --policy 3 + Fetch from remote libvirt ------------------------- @@ -200,6 +230,19 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --connect qemu+ssh://root@some.remote.host/system \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --kernel vmlinuz-5.11.12 \ + --initrd initramfs-5.11.12 \ + --cmdline "root=/dev/vda1" \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + Fetch from local libvirt ------------------------ diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index eb9485c6ed..062f9545f8 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ # firmware versions with known flaws. # +import abc import argparse from base64 import b64decode from hashlib import sha256 @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ import re import socket import sys import traceback +from uuid import UUID from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -70,6 +72,85 @@ class InvalidStateException(Exception): pass +class GUIDTable(abc.ABC): + GUID_LEN = 16 + + def __init__(self, guid, lenlen=2): + self.guid = guid + self.lenlen = lenlen + + @abc.abstractmethod + def entries(self): + pass + + def build_entry(self, guid, payload, lenlen): + dummylen = int(0).to_bytes(lenlen, 'little') + entry = bytearray(guid + dummylen + payload) + + lenle = len(entry).to_bytes(lenlen, 'little') + entry[self.GUID_LEN:(self.GUID_LEN + lenlen)] = lenle + + return bytes(entry) + + def build(self): + payload = self.entries() + + if len(payload) == 0: + return bytes([]) + + dummylen = int(0).to_bytes(self.lenlen, 'little') + table = bytearray(self.guid + dummylen + payload) + + guidlen = len(table).to_bytes(self.lenlen, 'little') + table[self.GUID_LEN:(self.GUID_LEN + self.lenlen)] = guidlen + + pad = 16 - (len(table) % 16) + table += bytes([0]) * pad + + log.debug("Table: %s", bytes(table).hex()) + return bytes(table) + + +class KernelTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{9438d606-4f22-4cc9-b479-a793-d411fd21}').bytes_le + KERNEL_GUID = UUID('{4de79437-abd2-427f-b835-d5b1-72d2045b}').bytes_le + INITRD_GUID = UUID('{44baf731-3a2f-4bd7-9af1-41e2-9169781d}').bytes_le + CMDLINE_GUID = UUID('{97d02dd8-bd20-4c94-aa78-e771-4d36ab2a}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=2) + + self.kernel = None + self.initrd = None + self.cmdline = None + + def load_kernel(self, path): + with open(path, "rb") as fh: + self.kernel = sha256(fh.read()).digest() + log.debug("Kernel: %s", self.kernel.hex()) + + def load_initrd(self, path): + with open(path, "rb") as fh: + self.initrd = sha256(fh.read()).digest() + log.debug("Initrd: %s", self.initrd.hex()) + + def load_cmdline(self, val): + self.cmdline = sha256(val.encode("utf8") + bytes([0])).digest() + log.debug("Cmdline: %s", self.cmdline.hex()) + + def entries(self): + entries = bytes([]) + if self.cmdline is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.CMDLINE_GUID, self.cmdline, 2) + if self.initrd is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.INITRD_GUID, self.initrd, 2) + if self.kernel is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.KERNEL_GUID, self.kernel, 2) + return entries + + class ConfidentialVM(object): def __init__(self, @@ -88,6 +169,8 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): self.tik = None self.tek = None + self.kernel_table = KernelTable() + def load_tik_tek(self, tik_path, tek_path): with open(tik_path, 'rb') as fh: self.tik = fh.read() @@ -129,8 +212,10 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): # of the following: # # - The firmware blob + # - The kernel GUID table def get_measured_data(self): - measured_data = self.firmware + measured_data = (self.firmware + + self.kernel_table.build()) log.debug("Measured-data(sha256): %s", sha256(measured_data).hexdigest()) return measured_data @@ -298,6 +383,12 @@ def parse_command_line(): vmconfig = parser.add_argument_group("Virtual machine config") vmconfig.add_argument('--firmware', '-f', help='Path to the firmware binary') + vmconfig.add_argument('--kernel', '-k', + help='Path to the kernel binary') + vmconfig.add_argument('--initrd', '-r', + help='Path to the initrd binary') + vmconfig.add_argument('--cmdline', '-e', + help='Cmdline string booted with') vmconfig.add_argument('--tik', help='TIK file for domain') vmconfig.add_argument('--tek', @@ -379,6 +470,15 @@ def attest(args): else: cvm.load_tik_tek(args.tik, args.tek) + if args.kernel is not None: + cvm.kernel_table.load_kernel(args.kernel) + + if args.initrd is not None: + cvm.kernel_table.load_initrd(args.initrd) + + if args.cmdline is not None: + cvm.kernel_table.load_cmdline(args.cmdline) + if args.domain is not None: cvm.load_domain(args.connect, args.domain, -- 2.37.3

(sorry in advance for missing CCs, I tried to download the mbox from https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/ but it doesn't include the To and Cc lines of the messages.) On 19/10/2022 13:17, berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrangé) wrote:
When doing direct kernel boot we need to include the kernel, initrd and cmdline in the measurement.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang? <berrange at redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 43 ++++++++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index 2c02a27103..da804ae6a0 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -102,6 +102,20 @@ initialize AMD SEV. For the validation to be trustworthy it important that the firmware build used has no support for loading non-volatile variables from NVRAM, even if NVRAM is expose to the guest.
+``-k PATH``, ``--kernel=PATH`` + +Path to the kernel binary if doing direct kernel boot. + +``-r PATH``, ``--initrd=PATH`` + +Path to the initrd binary if doing direct kernel boot. Defaults to zero length +content if omitted. + +``-e STRING``, ``--cmdline=STRING`` + +String containing any kernel command line parameters used during boot of the +domain. Defaults to the empty string if omitted. + ``--tik PATH``
TIK file for domain. This file must be exactly 16 bytes in size and contains the @@ -180,6 +194,22 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --build-id 13 \ --policy 3
+Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --kernel vmlinuz-5.11.12 \ + --initrd initramfs-5.11.12 \ + --cmdline "root=/dev/vda1" \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --measurement Zs2pf19ubFSafpZ2WKkwquXvACx9Wt/BV+eJwQ/taO8jhyIj/F8swFrybR1fZ2ID \ + --api-major 0 \ + --api-minor 24 \ + --build-id 13 \ + --policy 3 + Fetch from remote libvirt -------------------------
@@ -200,6 +230,19 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64
+Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --connect qemu+ssh://root at some.remote.host/system \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --kernel vmlinuz-5.11.12 \ + --initrd initramfs-5.11.12 \ + --cmdline "root=/dev/vda1" \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + Fetch from local libvirt ------------------------
diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index eb9485c6ed..062f9545f8 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ # firmware versions with known flaws. #
+import abc import argparse from base64 import b64decode from hashlib import sha256 @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ import re import socket import sys import traceback +from uuid import UUID
from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -70,6 +72,85 @@ class InvalidStateException(Exception): pass
+class GUIDTable(abc.ABC): + GUID_LEN = 16 + + def __init__(self, guid, lenlen=2): + self.guid = guid + self.lenlen = lenlen + + @abc.abstractmethod + def entries(self): + pass + + def build_entry(self, guid, payload, lenlen): + dummylen = int(0).to_bytes(lenlen, 'little') + entry = bytearray(guid + dummylen + payload) + + lenle = len(entry).to_bytes(lenlen, 'little') + entry[self.GUID_LEN:(self.GUID_LEN + lenlen)] = lenle + + return bytes(entry) + + def build(self): + payload = self.entries() + + if len(payload) == 0: + return bytes([]) + + dummylen = int(0).to_bytes(self.lenlen, 'little') + table = bytearray(self.guid + dummylen + payload) + + guidlen = len(table).to_bytes(self.lenlen, 'little') + table[self.GUID_LEN:(self.GUID_LEN + self.lenlen)] = guidlen + + pad = 16 - (len(table) % 16) + table += bytes([0]) * pad + + log.debug("Table: %s", bytes(table).hex()) + return bytes(table) + + +class KernelTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{9438d606-4f22-4cc9-b479-a793-d411fd21}').bytes_le + KERNEL_GUID = UUID('{4de79437-abd2-427f-b835-d5b1-72d2045b}').bytes_le + INITRD_GUID = UUID('{44baf731-3a2f-4bd7-9af1-41e2-9169781d}').bytes_le + CMDLINE_GUID = UUID('{97d02dd8-bd20-4c94-aa78-e771-4d36ab2a}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=2) + + self.kernel = None + self.initrd = None + self.cmdline = None + + def load_kernel(self, path): + with open(path, "rb") as fh: + self.kernel = sha256(fh.read()).digest() + log.debug("Kernel: %s", self.kernel.hex()) + + def load_initrd(self, path): + with open(path, "rb") as fh: + self.initrd = sha256(fh.read()).digest() + log.debug("Initrd: %s", self.initrd.hex()) + + def load_cmdline(self, val): + self.cmdline = sha256(val.encode("utf8") + bytes([0])).digest() + log.debug("Cmdline: %s", self.cmdline.hex()) + + def entries(self): + entries = bytes([]) + if self.cmdline is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.CMDLINE_GUID, self.cmdline, 2) + if self.initrd is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.INITRD_GUID, self.initrd, 2)
I think this will not work correctly if cmdline and/or initrd are not supplied. The QEMU behaviour is to always include all three entries in the table. If initrd is not supplied then its entry should be sha256(""). If cmdline is not supplied then its entry should be sha256(bytes[0]). In any case, for direct boot kernel must be supplied. It doesn't make sense to pass initrd or cmdline without kernel. -Dov
+ if self.kernel is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.KERNEL_GUID, self.kernel, 2) + return entries + + class ConfidentialVM(object):
def __init__(self, @@ -88,6 +169,8 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): self.tik = None self.tek = None
+ self.kernel_table = KernelTable() + def load_tik_tek(self, tik_path, tek_path): with open(tik_path, 'rb') as fh: self.tik = fh.read() @@ -129,8 +212,10 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): # of the following: # # - The firmware blob + # - The kernel GUID table def get_measured_data(self): - measured_data = self.firmware + measured_data = (self.firmware + + self.kernel_table.build()) log.debug("Measured-data(sha256): %s", sha256(measured_data).hexdigest()) return measured_data @@ -298,6 +383,12 @@ def parse_command_line(): vmconfig = parser.add_argument_group("Virtual machine config") vmconfig.add_argument('--firmware', '-f', help='Path to the firmware binary') + vmconfig.add_argument('--kernel', '-k', + help='Path to the kernel binary') + vmconfig.add_argument('--initrd', '-r', + help='Path to the initrd binary') + vmconfig.add_argument('--cmdline', '-e', + help='Cmdline string booted with') vmconfig.add_argument('--tik', help='TIK file for domain') vmconfig.add_argument('--tek', @@ -379,6 +470,15 @@ def attest(args): else: cvm.load_tik_tek(args.tik, args.tek)
+ if args.kernel is not None: + cvm.kernel_table.load_kernel(args.kernel) + + if args.initrd is not None: + cvm.kernel_table.load_initrd(args.initrd) + + if args.cmdline is not None: + cvm.kernel_table.load_cmdline(args.cmdline) + if args.domain is not None: cvm.load_domain(args.connect, args.domain,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:57:33PM +0300, Dov Murik wrote:
(sorry in advance for missing CCs, I tried to download the mbox from https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/ but it doesn't include the To and Cc lines of the messages.)
On 19/10/2022 13:17, berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrangé) wrote:
When doing direct kernel boot we need to include the kernel, initrd and cmdline in the measurement.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang? <berrange at redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 43 ++++++++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index 2c02a27103..da804ae6a0 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -102,6 +102,20 @@ initialize AMD SEV. For the validation to be trustworthy it important that the firmware build used has no support for loading non-volatile variables from NVRAM, even if NVRAM is expose to the guest.
+``-k PATH``, ``--kernel=PATH`` + +Path to the kernel binary if doing direct kernel boot. + +``-r PATH``, ``--initrd=PATH`` + +Path to the initrd binary if doing direct kernel boot. Defaults to zero length +content if omitted. + +``-e STRING``, ``--cmdline=STRING`` + +String containing any kernel command line parameters used during boot of the +domain. Defaults to the empty string if omitted. + ``--tik PATH``
TIK file for domain. This file must be exactly 16 bytes in size and contains the @@ -180,6 +194,22 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --build-id 13 \ --policy 3
+Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --kernel vmlinuz-5.11.12 \ + --initrd initramfs-5.11.12 \ + --cmdline "root=/dev/vda1" \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --measurement Zs2pf19ubFSafpZ2WKkwquXvACx9Wt/BV+eJwQ/taO8jhyIj/F8swFrybR1fZ2ID \ + --api-major 0 \ + --api-minor 24 \ + --build-id 13 \ + --policy 3 + Fetch from remote libvirt -------------------------
@@ -200,6 +230,19 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64
+Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --connect qemu+ssh://root at some.remote.host/system \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --kernel vmlinuz-5.11.12 \ + --initrd initramfs-5.11.12 \ + --cmdline "root=/dev/vda1" \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + Fetch from local libvirt ------------------------
diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index eb9485c6ed..062f9545f8 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ # firmware versions with known flaws. #
+import abc import argparse from base64 import b64decode from hashlib import sha256 @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ import re import socket import sys import traceback +from uuid import UUID
from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -70,6 +72,85 @@ class InvalidStateException(Exception): pass
+class GUIDTable(abc.ABC): + GUID_LEN = 16 + + def __init__(self, guid, lenlen=2): + self.guid = guid + self.lenlen = lenlen + + @abc.abstractmethod + def entries(self): + pass + + def build_entry(self, guid, payload, lenlen): + dummylen = int(0).to_bytes(lenlen, 'little') + entry = bytearray(guid + dummylen + payload) + + lenle = len(entry).to_bytes(lenlen, 'little') + entry[self.GUID_LEN:(self.GUID_LEN + lenlen)] = lenle + + return bytes(entry) + + def build(self): + payload = self.entries() + + if len(payload) == 0: + return bytes([]) + + dummylen = int(0).to_bytes(self.lenlen, 'little') + table = bytearray(self.guid + dummylen + payload) + + guidlen = len(table).to_bytes(self.lenlen, 'little') + table[self.GUID_LEN:(self.GUID_LEN + self.lenlen)] = guidlen + + pad = 16 - (len(table) % 16) + table += bytes([0]) * pad + + log.debug("Table: %s", bytes(table).hex()) + return bytes(table) + + +class KernelTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{9438d606-4f22-4cc9-b479-a793-d411fd21}').bytes_le + KERNEL_GUID = UUID('{4de79437-abd2-427f-b835-d5b1-72d2045b}').bytes_le + INITRD_GUID = UUID('{44baf731-3a2f-4bd7-9af1-41e2-9169781d}').bytes_le + CMDLINE_GUID = UUID('{97d02dd8-bd20-4c94-aa78-e771-4d36ab2a}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=2) + + self.kernel = None + self.initrd = None + self.cmdline = None + + def load_kernel(self, path): + with open(path, "rb") as fh: + self.kernel = sha256(fh.read()).digest() + log.debug("Kernel: %s", self.kernel.hex()) + + def load_initrd(self, path): + with open(path, "rb") as fh: + self.initrd = sha256(fh.read()).digest() + log.debug("Initrd: %s", self.initrd.hex()) + + def load_cmdline(self, val): + self.cmdline = sha256(val.encode("utf8") + bytes([0])).digest() + log.debug("Cmdline: %s", self.cmdline.hex()) + + def entries(self): + entries = bytes([]) + if self.cmdline is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.CMDLINE_GUID, self.cmdline, 2) + if self.initrd is not None: + entries += self.build_entry(self.INITRD_GUID, self.initrd, 2)
I think this will not work correctly if cmdline and/or initrd are not supplied. The QEMU behaviour is to always include all three entries in the table.
If initrd is not supplied then its entry should be sha256("").
If cmdline is not supplied then its entry should be sha256(bytes[0]).
Ah yes, I had known that, but completely forgot to address it before sending. I wonder if we should fully describe the SEV hashes table in the docs/specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst file, to avoid others making the same mistake.
In any case, for direct boot kernel must be supplied. It doesn't make sense to pass initrd or cmdline without kernel.
Good point, will make that combination report an error. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

When connected to libvirt we can validate that the guest configuration has the kernel hashes property enabled, otherwise including the kernel GUID table in our expected measurements is not likely to match the actual measurement. When running locally we can also automatically detect the kernel/initrd paths, along with the cmdline string from the XML. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 9 ++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index da804ae6a0..beb40383be 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -263,6 +263,15 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --insecure \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + EXIT STATUS =========== diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 062f9545f8..3c2c670689 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -294,6 +294,35 @@ class LibvirtConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): raise IncorrectConfigException( "Domain must have one firmware path") + measure_kernel_nodes = doc.xpath( + "/domain/launchSecurity[@type='sev']/@kernelHashes") + measure_kernel = False + if len(measure_kernel_nodes) == 1: + if measure_kernel_nodes[0] == "yes": + measure_kernel = True + + xp_kernel = "/domain/os/kernel" + xp_initrd = "/domain/os/initrd" + xp_cmdline = "/domain/os/cmdline" + kern_nodes = (doc.xpath(xp_kernel) + + doc.xpath(xp_initrd) + + doc.xpath(xp_cmdline)) + if not measure_kernel: + if len(self.kernel_table.entries()) != 0: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "kernel/initrd/cmdline provided but kernel " + "measurement not enabled") + + # Check for an insecure scenario + if len(kern_nodes) != 0 and secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "direct kernel boot present without measurement") + else: + if len(kern_nodes) == 0: + raise IncorrectConfigException( + "kernel/initrd/cmdline not provided but kernel " + "measurement is enabled") + def load_domain(self, uri, id_name_uuid, secure, ignore_config): self.conn = libvirt.open(uri) @@ -357,6 +386,36 @@ class LibvirtConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): self.load_firmware(loadernodes[0].text) + if self.kernel_table.kernel is None: + kernelnodes = doc.xpath("/domain/os/kernel") + if len(kernelnodes) != 0: + if remote: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Cannot access kernel path remotely") + if secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "Using kernel path from XML is not secure") + self.kernel_table.load_kernel(kernelnodes[0].text) + + if self.kernel_table.initrd is None: + initrdnodes = doc.xpath("/domain/os/initrd") + if len(initrdnodes) != 0: + if remote: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Cannot access initrd path remotely") + if secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "Using initrd path from XML is not secure") + self.kernel_table.load_initrd(initrdnodes[0].text) + + if self.kernel_table.cmdline is None: + cmdlinenodes = doc.xpath("/domain/os/cmdline") + if len(cmdlinenodes) != 0: + if secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "Using cmdline string from XML is not secure") + self.kernel_table.load_cmdline(cmdlinenodes[0].text) + def parse_command_line(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( -- 2.37.3

With the SEV-ES policy the VMSA state of each vCPU must be included in the measured data. The VMSA state can be generated using the 'sevctl' tool, by telling it a QEMU VMSA is required, and passing the hypevisor's CPU SKU (family, model, stepping). Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index beb40383be..24bca98d28 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -116,6 +116,23 @@ content if omitted. String containing any kernel command line parameters used during boot of the domain. Defaults to the empty string if omitted. +``-n COUNT``, ``--num-cpus=COUNT`` + +The number of virtual CPUs for the domain. This is required when the +domain policy is set to require SEV-ES. + +``-0 PATH``, ``--vmsa-cpu0=PATH`` + +Path to the VMSA initial state for the boot CPU. This is required when +the domain policy is set to require SEV-ES. The file contents must be +exactly 4096 bytes in length. + +``-1 PATH``, ``--vmsa-cpu1=PATH`` + +Path to the VMSA initial state for the non-boot CPU. This is required when +the domain policy is set to require SEV-ES and the domain has more than one +CPU present. The file contents must be exactly 4096 bytes in length. + ``--tik PATH`` TIK file for domain. This file must be exactly 16 bytes in size and contains the @@ -210,6 +227,22 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: --build-id 13 \ --policy 3 +Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --num-cpus 2 \ + --vmsa-cpu0 vmsa0.bin \ + --vmsa-cpu1 vmsa1.bin \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --measurement Zs2pf19ubFSafpZ2WKkwquXvACx9Wt/BV+eJwQ/taO8jhyIj/F8swFrybR1fZ2ID \ + --api-major 0 \ + --api-minor 24 \ + --build-id 13 \ + --policy 7 + Fetch from remote libvirt ------------------------- @@ -243,6 +276,19 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --connect qemu+ssh://root@some.remote.host/system \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --num-cpus 2 \ + --vmsa-cpu0 vmsa0.bin \ + --vmsa-cpu1 vmsa1.bin \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + Fetch from local libvirt ------------------------ @@ -272,6 +318,18 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV guest with direct kernel boot: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --insecure \ + --num-cpus 2 \ + --vmsa-cpu0 vmsa0.bin \ + --vmsa-cpu1 vmsa1.bin \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + EXIT STATUS =========== diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 3c2c670689..a88d7dfc01 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -152,13 +152,16 @@ class KernelTable(GUIDTable): class ConfidentialVM(object): + POLICY_BIT_SEV_ES = 2 + POLICY_VAL_SEV_ES = (1 << POLICY_BIT_SEV_ES) def __init__(self, measurement=None, api_major=None, api_minor=None, build_id=None, - policy=None): + policy=None, + num_cpus=None): self.measurement = measurement self.api_major = api_major self.api_minor = api_minor @@ -169,8 +172,15 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): self.tik = None self.tek = None + self.num_cpus = num_cpus + self.vmsa_cpu0 = None + self.vmsa_cpu1 = None + self.kernel_table = KernelTable() + def is_sev_es(self): + return self.policy & self.POLICY_VAL_SEV_ES + def load_tik_tek(self, tik_path, tek_path): with open(tik_path, 'rb') as fh: self.tik = fh.read() @@ -206,6 +216,43 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): self.firmware = fh.read() log.debug("Loader(sha256): %s", sha256(self.firmware).hexdigest()) + @staticmethod + def _load_vmsa(path): + with open(path, 'rb') as fh: + vmsa = fh.read() + + if len(vmsa) != 4096: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "VMSA must be 4096 bytes in length") + return vmsa + + def load_vmsa_cpu0(self, path): + self.vmsa_cpu0 = self._load_vmsa(path) + log.debug("VMSA CPU 0(sha256): %s", + sha256(self.vmsa_cpu0).hexdigest()) + + def load_vmsa_cpu1(self, path): + self.vmsa_cpu1 = self._load_vmsa(path) + log.debug("VMSA CPU 1(sha256): %s", + sha256(self.vmsa_cpu1).hexdigest()) + + def get_cpu_state(self): + if self.num_cpus is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Number of virtual CPUs must be specified for SEV-ES domain") + + if self.vmsa_cpu0 is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "VMSA for boot CPU required for SEV-ES domain") + + if self.num_cpus > 1 and self.vmsa_cpu1 is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "VMSA for additional CPUs required for SEV-ES domain with SMP") + + vmsa = self.vmsa_cpu0 + (self.vmsa_cpu1 * (self.num_cpus - 1)) + log.debug("VMSA(sha256): %s", sha256(vmsa).hexdigest()) + return vmsa + # Get the full set of measured launch data for the domain # # The measured data that the guest is initialized with is the concatenation @@ -216,6 +263,8 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): def get_measured_data(self): measured_data = (self.firmware + self.kernel_table.build()) + if self.is_sev_es(): + measured_data += self.get_cpu_state() log.debug("Measured-data(sha256): %s", sha256(measured_data).hexdigest()) return measured_data @@ -448,6 +497,12 @@ def parse_command_line(): help='Path to the initrd binary') vmconfig.add_argument('--cmdline', '-e', help='Cmdline string booted with') + vmconfig.add_argument('--num-cpus', '-n', type=int, + help='Number of virtual CPUs') + vmconfig.add_argument('--vmsa-cpu0', '-0', + help='VMSA state for the boot CPU') + vmconfig.add_argument('--vmsa-cpu1', '-1', + help='VMSA state for the additional CPUs') vmconfig.add_argument('--tik', help='TIK file for domain') vmconfig.add_argument('--tek', @@ -513,13 +568,15 @@ def attest(args): api_major=args.api_major, api_minor=args.api_minor, build_id=args.build_id, - policy=args.policy) + policy=args.policy, + num_cpus=args.num_cpus) else: cvm = LibvirtConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, api_major=args.api_major, api_minor=args.api_minor, build_id=args.build_id, - policy=args.policy) + policy=args.policy, + num_cpus=args.num_cpus) if args.firmware is not None: cvm.load_firmware(args.firmware) @@ -538,6 +595,12 @@ def attest(args): if args.cmdline is not None: cvm.kernel_table.load_cmdline(args.cmdline) + if args.vmsa_cpu0 is not None: + cvm.load_vmsa_cpu0(args.vmsa_cpu0) + + if args.vmsa_cpu1 is not None: + cvm.load_vmsa_cpu1(args.vmsa_cpu1) + if args.domain is not None: cvm.load_domain(args.connect, args.domain, -- 2.37.3

The VMSA files contain the expected CPU register state for the VM. Their content varies based on a few pieces of the stack - AMD CPU architectural initial state - KVM hypervisor VM CPU initialization - QEMU userspace VM CPU initialization - AMD CPU SKU (family/model/stepping) The first three pieces of information we can obtain through code inspection. The last piece of information we can take on the command line. This allows a user to validate a SEV-ES guest merely by providing the CPU SKU information, using --cpu-family, --cpu-model, --cpu-stepping. This avoids the need to obtain or construct VMSA files directly. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 45 +++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 467 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 512 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index 24bca98d28..7ba7323e13 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -243,6 +243,24 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk: --build-id 13 \ --policy 7 +Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk, with +automatically constructed VMSA: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --num-cpus 2 \ + --cpu-family 23 \ + --cpu-model 49 \ + --cpu-stepping 0 \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --measurement Zs2pf19ubFSafpZ2WKkwquXvACx9Wt/BV+eJwQ/taO8jhyIj/F8swFrybR1fZ2ID \ + --api-major 0 \ + --api-minor 24 \ + --build-id 13 \ + --policy 7 + Fetch from remote libvirt ------------------------- @@ -289,6 +307,20 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk, with +automatically constructed VMSA: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --connect qemu+ssh://root@some.remote.host/system \ + --firmware OVMF.sev.fd \ + --cpu-family 23 \ + --cpu-model 49 \ + --cpu-stepping 0 \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + Fetch from local libvirt ------------------------ @@ -330,6 +362,19 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk, with +automatically constructed VMSA: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --insecure \ + --cpu-family 23 \ + --cpu-model 49 \ + --cpu-stepping 0 \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 + EXIT STATUS =========== diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index a88d7dfc01..716149e6df 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ import hmac import logging import re import socket +from struct import pack import sys import traceback from uuid import UUID @@ -72,6 +73,427 @@ class InvalidStateException(Exception): pass +class Field(object): + U8 = 0 + U16 = 2 + U32 = 4 + U64 = 8 + + SCALAR = 0 + BITMASK = 1 + ARRAY = 2 + + def __init__(self, name, size, fmt, value, order): + self.name = name + self.size = size + self.value = value + self.fmt = fmt + self.order = order + + +class Struct(object): + def __init__(self, size): + self._fields = {} + self.size = size + + def register_field(self, name, size, fmt=Field.SCALAR, defvalue=0): + self._fields[name] = Field(name, size, fmt, + defvalue, len(self.fields)) + + @property + def fields(self): + return sorted(self._fields.values(), key=lambda f: f.order) + + def __getattr__(self, name): + return self._fields[name] + + def __setattr__(self, name, value): + if name in ["_fields", "size"]: + super().__setattr__(name, value) + else: + self._fields[name].value = value + + def binary_format(self): + fmt = ["<"] + datalen = 0 + for field in self.fields: + if field.size == Field.U8: + if field.fmt == Field.ARRAY: + datalen += len(field.value) + fmt += ["%dB" % len(field.value)] + else: + datalen += 1 + fmt += ["B"] + elif field.size == Field.U16: + datalen += 2 + fmt += ["H"] + elif field.size == Field.U32: + datalen += 4 + fmt += ["L"] + elif field.size == Field.U64: + datalen += 8 + fmt += ["Q"] + + pad = self.size - datalen + assert self.size >= 1 + fmt += ["%dB" % pad] + + return "".join(fmt), pad + + def pack(self): + fmt, pad = self.binary_format() + + values = [] + for field in self.fields: + if field.size == Field.U8 and field.fmt == Field.ARRAY: + for _, k in enumerate(field.value): + values.append(k) + else: + values.append(field.value) + values.extend([0] * pad) + + return pack(fmt, *values) + + +class VMSA(Struct): + ATTR_G_SHIFT = 23 + ATTR_G_MASK = (1 << ATTR_G_SHIFT) + ATTR_B_SHIFT = 22 + ATTR_B_MASK = (1 << ATTR_B_SHIFT) + ATTR_L_SHIFT = 21 + ATTR_L_MASK = (1 << ATTR_L_SHIFT) + ATTR_AVL_SHIFT = 20 + ATTR_AVL_MASK = (1 << ATTR_AVL_SHIFT) + ATTR_P_SHIFT = 15 + ATTR_P_MASK = (1 << ATTR_P_SHIFT) + ATTR_DPL_SHIFT = 13 + ATTR_DPL_MASK = (3 << ATTR_DPL_SHIFT) + ATTR_S_SHIFT = 12 + ATTR_S_MASK = (1 << ATTR_S_SHIFT) + ATTR_TYPE_SHIFT = 8 + ATTR_TYPE_MASK = (15 << ATTR_TYPE_SHIFT) + ATTR_A_MASK = (1 << 8) + + ATTR_CS_MASK = (1 << 11) + ATTR_C_MASK = (1 << 10) + ATTR_R_MASK = (1 << 9) + + ATTR_E_MASK = (1 << 10) + ATTR_W_MASK = (1 << 9) + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(4096) + + # From Linux arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h, we're unpacking the + # struct vmcb_save_area + + self.register_field("es_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("es_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("es_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("es_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("cs_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("cs_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("cs_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("cs_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("ss_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("ss_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("ss_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("ss_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("ds_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("ds_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("ds_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("ds_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("fs_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("fs_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("fs_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("fs_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("gs_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("gs_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("gs_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("gs_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("gdtr_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("gdtr_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("gdtr_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("gdtr_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("ldtr_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("ldtr_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("ldtr_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("ldtr_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("idtr_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("idtr_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("idtr_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("idtr_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("tr_selector", Field.U16) + self.register_field("tr_attrib", Field.U16, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("tr_limit", Field.U32) + self.register_field("tr_base", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_1", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 43)) + + self.register_field("cpl", Field.U8) + + self.register_field("reserved_2", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 4)) + + self.register_field("efer", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_3", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 104)) + + self.register_field("xss", Field.U64) + self.register_field("cr4", Field.U64) + self.register_field("cr3", Field.U64) + self.register_field("cr0", Field.U64) + self.register_field("dr7", Field.U64) + self.register_field("dr6", Field.U64) + self.register_field("rflags", Field.U64) + self.register_field("rip", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_4", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 88)) + + self.register_field("rsp", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_5", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 24)) + + self.register_field("rax", Field.U64) + self.register_field("star", Field.U64) + self.register_field("lstar", Field.U64) + self.register_field("cstar", Field.U64) + self.register_field("sfmask", Field.U64) + self.register_field("kernel_gs_base", Field.U64) + self.register_field("sysenter_cs", Field.U64) + self.register_field("sysenter_esp", Field.U64) + self.register_field("sysenter_eip", Field.U64) + self.register_field("cr2", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_6", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 32)) + + self.register_field("g_pat", Field.U64) + self.register_field("dbgctl", Field.U64) + self.register_field("br_from", Field.U64) + self.register_field("br_to", Field.U64) + self.register_field("last_excp_from", Field.U64) + self.register_field("last_excp_to", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_7", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 72)) + + self.register_field("spec_ctrl", Field.U32) + + self.register_field("reserved_7b", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 4)) + + self.register_field("pkru", Field.U32) + + self.register_field("reserved_7a", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 20)) + + self.register_field("reserved_8", Field.U64) # rax duplicate + + self.register_field("rcx", Field.U64) + self.register_field("rdx", Field.U64, Field.BITMASK) + self.register_field("rbx", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_9", Field.U64) # rsp duplicate + + self.register_field("rbp", Field.U64) + self.register_field("rsi", Field.U64) + self.register_field("rdi", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r8", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r9", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r10", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r11", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r12", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r13", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r14", Field.U64) + self.register_field("r15", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_10", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 16)) + + self.register_field("sw_exit_code", Field.U64) + self.register_field("sw_exit_info_1", Field.U64) + self.register_field("sw_exit_info_2", Field.U64) + self.register_field("sw_scratch", Field.U64) + + self.register_field("reserved_11", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 56)) + + self.register_field("xcr0", Field.U64) + self.register_field("valid_bitmap", + Field.U8, Field.ARRAY, bytearray([0] * 16)) + self.register_field("x87_state_gpa", + Field.U64) + + def amd64_cpu_init(self): + # AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual + # Volume 2: System Programming. + # + # 14.1.3 Processor Initialization State + # + # Values after INIT + + self.cr0 = (1 << 4) + self.rip = 0xfff0 + + self.cs_selector = 0xf000 + self.cs_base = 0xffff0000 + self.cs_limit = 0xffff + + self.ds_limit = 0xffff + + self.es_limit = 0xffff + self.fs_limit = 0xffff + self.gs_limit = 0xffff + self.ss_limit = 0xffff + + self.gdtr_limit = 0xffff + self.idtr_limit = 0xffff + + self.ldtr_limit = 0xffff + self.tr_limit = 0xffff + + self.dr6 = 0xffff0ff0 + self.dr7 = 0x0400 + self.rflags = 0x2 + self.xcr0 = 0x1 + + def kvm_cpu_init(self): + # svm_set_cr4() sets guest X86_CR4_MCE bit if host + # has X86_CR4_MCE enabled + self.cr4 = 0x40 + + # svm_set_efer sets guest EFER_SVME (Secure Virtual Machine enable) + self.efer = 0x1000 + + # init_vmcb + init_sys_seg() sets + # SVM_SELECTOR_P_MASK | SEG_TYPE_LDT + self.ldtr_attrib = 0x0082 + + # init_vmcb + init_sys_seg() sets + # SVM_SELECTOR_P_MASK | SEG_TYPE_BUSY_TSS16 + self.tr_attrib = 0x0083 + + # kvm_arch_vcpu_create() in arch/x86/kvm/x86.c + self.g_pat = 0x0007040600070406 + + def qemu_cpu_init(self): + # Based on logic in x86_cpu_reset() + # + # file target/i386/cpu.c + + def attr(mask): + return (mask >> VMSA.ATTR_TYPE_SHIFT) + + self.ldtr_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + (2 << VMSA.ATTR_TYPE_SHIFT)) + self.tr_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + (11 << VMSA.ATTR_TYPE_SHIFT)) + self.cs_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_S_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_CS_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_R_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_A_MASK) + self.ds_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_S_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_W_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_A_MASK) + self.es_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_S_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_W_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_A_MASK) + self.ss_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_S_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_W_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_A_MASK) + self.fs_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_S_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_W_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_A_MASK) + self.gs_attrib = attr(VMSA.ATTR_P_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_S_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_W_MASK | + VMSA.ATTR_A_MASK) + + self.g_pat = 0x0007040600070406 + + def cpu_sku(self, family, model, stepping): + stepping &= 0xf + model &= 0xff + family &= 0xfff + + self.rdx.value = stepping + + if family > 0xf: + self.rdx.value |= 0xf00 | ((family - 0x0f) << 20) + else: + self.rdx.value |= family << 8 + + self.rdx.value |= ((model & 0xf) << 4) | ((model >> 4) << 16) + + def reset_addr(self, reset_addr): + reset_cs = reset_addr & 0xffff0000 + reset_ip = reset_addr & 0x0000ffff + + self.rip.value = reset_ip + self.cs_base.value = reset_cs + + +class OVMF(object): + + OVMF_TABLE_FOOTER_GUID = UUID("96b582de-1fb2-45f7-baea-a366c55a082d") + SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID = UUID("00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e") + + def __init__(self): + self.entries = {} + + def load(self, content): + expect = OVMF.OVMF_TABLE_FOOTER_GUID.bytes_le + actual = content[-48:-32] + if expect != actual: + raise Exception("OVMF footer GUID not found") + + tablelen = int.from_bytes(content[-50:-48], byteorder='little') + + if tablelen == 0: + raise Exception("OVMF tables zero length") + + table = content[-(32 + tablelen):-50] + + self.parse_table(table) + + def parse_table(self, data): + while len(data) > 0: + entryuuid = UUID(bytes_le=data[-16:]) + entrylen = int.from_bytes(data[-18:-16], byteorder='little') + entrydata = data[-entrylen:-18] + + self.entries[str(entryuuid)] = entrydata + + data = data[0:-entrylen] + + def reset_addr(self): + if str(OVMF.SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID) not in self.entries: + raise Exception("SEV info block GUID not found") + + reset_addr = int.from_bytes( + self.entries[str(OVMF.SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID)], "little") + return reset_addr + + class GUIDTable(abc.ABC): GUID_LEN = 16 @@ -236,6 +658,26 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): log.debug("VMSA CPU 1(sha256): %s", sha256(self.vmsa_cpu1).hexdigest()) + def build_vmsas(self, family, model, stepping): + ovmf = OVMF() + ovmf.load(self.firmware) + + vmsa = VMSA() + vmsa.amd64_cpu_init() + vmsa.kvm_cpu_init() + vmsa.qemu_cpu_init() + + vmsa.cpu_sku(family, model, stepping) + + self.vmsa_cpu0 = vmsa.pack() + log.debug("VMSA CPU 0(sha256): %s", + sha256(self.vmsa_cpu0).hexdigest()) + + vmsa.reset_addr(ovmf.reset_addr()) + self.vmsa_cpu1 = vmsa.pack() + log.debug("VMSA CPU 1(sha256): %s", + sha256(self.vmsa_cpu1).hexdigest()) + def get_cpu_state(self): if self.num_cpus is None: raise UnsupportedUsageException( @@ -503,6 +945,12 @@ def parse_command_line(): help='VMSA state for the boot CPU') vmconfig.add_argument('--vmsa-cpu1', '-1', help='VMSA state for the additional CPUs') + vmconfig.add_argument('--cpu-family', type=int, + help='Hypervisor host CPU family number') + vmconfig.add_argument('--cpu-model', type=int, + help='Hypervisor host CPU model number') + vmconfig.add_argument('--cpu-stepping', type=int, + help='Hypervisor host CPU stepping number') vmconfig.add_argument('--tik', help='TIK file for domain') vmconfig.add_argument('--tek', @@ -561,6 +1009,20 @@ def check_usage(args): raise UnsupportedUsageException( "Either --firmware or --domain is required") + sku = [args.cpu_family, args.cpu_model, args.cpu_stepping] + if sku.count(None) == len(sku): + if args.vmsa_cpu1 is not None and args.vmsa_cpu0 is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "VMSA for additional CPU also requires VMSA for boot CPU") + else: + if args.vmsa_cpu0 is not None or args.vmsa_cpu1 is not None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "VMSA files are mutually exclusive with CPU SKU") + + if sku.count(None) != 0: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "CPU SKU needs family, model and stepping for SEV-ES domain") + def attest(args): if args.domain is None: @@ -601,6 +1063,11 @@ def attest(args): if args.vmsa_cpu1 is not None: cvm.load_vmsa_cpu1(args.vmsa_cpu1) + if args.cpu_family is not None: + cvm.build_vmsas(args.cpu_family, + args.cpu_model, + args.cpu_stepping) + if args.domain is not None: cvm.load_domain(args.connect, args.domain, -- 2.37.3

When validating a SEV-ES guest, we need to know the CPU count and VMSA state. We can get the CPU count directly from libvirt's guest info. The VMSA state can be constructed automatically if we query the CPU SKU from host capabilities XML. Neither of these is secure, however, so this behaviour is restricted. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 4 ---- tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index 7ba7323e13..fcc13d68c8 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -356,7 +356,6 @@ Validate the measurement of a SEV-ES SMP guest booting from disk: # virt-dom-sev-validate \ --insecure \ - --num-cpus 2 \ --vmsa-cpu0 vmsa0.bin \ --vmsa-cpu1 vmsa1.bin \ --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ @@ -369,9 +368,6 @@ automatically constructed VMSA: # virt-dom-sev-validate \ --insecure \ - --cpu-family 23 \ - --cpu-model 49 \ - --cpu-stepping 0 \ --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 716149e6df..5ce5763d5b 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -862,6 +862,14 @@ class LibvirtConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): if self.policy is None: self.policy = sevinfo["sev-policy"] + if self.is_sev_es() and self.num_cpus is None: + if secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "Using CPU count from guest is not secure") + + info = self.dom.info() + self.num_cpus = info[3] + if self.firmware is None: if remote: raise UnsupportedUsageException( @@ -907,6 +915,24 @@ class LibvirtConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): "Using cmdline string from XML is not secure") self.kernel_table.load_cmdline(cmdlinenodes[0].text) + capsxml = self.conn.getCapabilities() + capsdoc = etree.fromstring(capsxml) + + if self.is_sev_es() and self.vmsa_cpu0 is None: + if secure: + raise InsecureUsageException( + "Using CPU SKU from capabilities is not secure") + + sig = capsdoc.xpath("/capabilities/host/cpu/signature") + if len(sig) != 1: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Libvirt is too old to report host CPU signature") + + cpu_family = int(sig[0].get("family")) + cpu_model = int(sig[0].get("model")) + cpu_stepping = int(sig[0].get("stepping")) + self.build_vmsas(cpu_family, cpu_model, cpu_stepping) + def parse_command_line(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( -- 2.37.3

It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 66 ++++++++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index fcc13d68c8..7542bea9aa 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -187,6 +187,29 @@ understand any configuration mistakes that have been made. If the will be skipped. The result is that the validation will likely be reported as failed. +Secret injection options +------------------------ + +These options provide a way to inject a secret if validation of the +launch measurement passes. + +``--disk-password PATH`` + +Path to a file containing the password to use to unlock the LUKS container +for the guest disk. + +``--secret-header PATH`` + +Path to a file in which the injected secret header will be written in base64 +format and later injected into the domain. This is required if there is no +connection to libvirt, otherwise the secret will be directly injected. + +``--secret-payload PATH`` + +Path to a file in which the injected secret payload will be written in base64 +format and later injected into the domain. This is required if there is no +connection to libvirt, otherwise the secret will be directly injected. + EXAMPLES ======== @@ -261,6 +284,26 @@ automatically constructed VMSA: --build-id 13 \ --policy 7 +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk and +inject a disk password on success: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --loader OVMF.sev.fd \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --measurement Zs2pf19ubFSafpZ2WKkwquXvACx9Wt/BV+eJwQ/taO8jhyIj/F8swFrybR1fZ2ID \ + --api-major 0 \ + --api-minor 24 \ + --build-id 13 \ + --policy 3 \ + --disk-password passwd.txt \ + --secret-header secret-header.b64 \ + --secret-payload secret-payload.b64 + +The ``secret-header.b64`` and ``secret-payload.b64`` files can now be sent to +the virtualization host for injection. + Fetch from remote libvirt ------------------------- @@ -321,6 +364,18 @@ automatically constructed VMSA: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk and +inject a disk password on success: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --connect qemu+ssh://root@some.remote.host/system \ + --loader OVMF.sev.fd \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 \ + --disk-password passwd.txt + Fetch from local libvirt ------------------------ @@ -371,6 +426,17 @@ automatically constructed VMSA: --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ --domain fedora34x86_64 +Validate the measurement of a SEV guest booting from disk and +inject a disk password on success: + +:: + + # virt-dom-sev-validate \ + --insecure \ + --tk this-guest-tk.bin \ + --domain fedora34x86_64 \ + --disk-password passwd.txt + EXIT STATUS =========== diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 5ce5763d5b..2d15edb933 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -36,16 +36,19 @@ import abc import argparse -from base64 import b64decode +from base64 import b64decode, b64encode from hashlib import sha256 import hmac import logging +import os import re import socket from struct import pack import sys import traceback from uuid import UUID +from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, algorithms, modes + from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -573,7 +576,26 @@ class KernelTable(GUIDTable): return entries -class ConfidentialVM(object): +class SecretsTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{1e74f542-71dd-4d66-963e-ef4287ff173b}').bytes_le + DISK_PW_GUID = UUID('{736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=4) + self.disk_password = None + + def load_disk_password(self, path): + with open(path, 'rb') as fh: + self.disk_password = fh.read() + + def entries(self): + return self.build_entry(self.DISK_PW_GUID, + self.disk_password + bytes([0]), 4) + + +class ConfidentialVM(abc.ABC): POLICY_BIT_SEV_ES = 2 POLICY_VAL_SEV_ES = (1 << POLICY_BIT_SEV_ES) @@ -599,6 +621,7 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): self.vmsa_cpu1 = None self.kernel_table = KernelTable() + self.secrets_table = SecretsTable() def is_sev_es(self): return self.policy & self.POLICY_VAL_SEV_ES @@ -751,6 +774,82 @@ class ConfidentialVM(object): raise AttestationFailedException( "Measurement does not match, VM is not trustworthy") + def build_secrets(self): + measurement, _ = self.get_measurements() + + iv = os.urandom(16) + + secret_table = self.secrets_table.build() + + cipher = Cipher(algorithms.AES(self.tek), modes.CTR(iv)) + enc = cipher.encryptor() + secret_table_ciphertext = (enc.update(secret_table) + + enc.finalize()) + + flags = 0 + + ## + # Table 55. LAUNCH_SECRET Packet Header Buffer + ## + header = ( + flags.to_bytes(4, byteorder='little') + + iv + ) + + # AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization API , section 6.6 + # + # hdrmac = HMAC(0x01 || FLAGS || IV || GUEST_LENGTH || + # TRANS_LENGTH || DATA || + # MEASURE; GCTX.TIK) + # + msg = ( + bytes([0x01]) + + flags.to_bytes(4, byteorder='little') + + iv + + len(secret_table).to_bytes(4, byteorder='little') + + len(secret_table).to_bytes(4, byteorder='little') + + secret_table_ciphertext + + measurement + ) + + h = hmac.new(self.tik, msg, 'sha256') + header = ( + flags.to_bytes(4, byteorder='little') + + iv + + h.digest() + ) + + header64 = b64encode(header).decode('utf8') + secret64 = b64encode(secret_table_ciphertext).decode('utf8') + log.debug("Header: %s (%d bytes)", header64, len(header)) + log.debug("Secret: %s (%d bytes)", + secret64, len(secret_table_ciphertext)) + + return header64, secret64 + + @abc.abstractmethod + def inject_secrets(self): + pass + + +class OfflineConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): + def __init__(self, + secret_header=None, + secret_payload=None, + **kwargs): + super().__init__(**kwargs) + + self.secret_header = secret_header + self.secret_payload = secret_payload + + def inject_secrets(self): + header64, secret64 = self.build_secrets() + + with open(self.secret_header, "wb") as fh: + fh.write(header64.encode('utf8')) + with open(self.secret_payload, "wb") as fh: + fh.write(secret64.encode('utf8')) + class LibvirtConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): def __init__(self, **kwargs): @@ -933,6 +1032,14 @@ class LibvirtConfidentialVM(ConfidentialVM): cpu_stepping = int(sig[0].get("stepping")) self.build_vmsas(cpu_family, cpu_model, cpu_stepping) + def inject_secrets(self): + header64, secret64 = self.build_secrets() + + params = {"sev-secret": secret64, + "sev-secret-header": header64} + self.dom.setLaunchSecurityState(params, 0) + self.dom.resume() + def parse_command_line(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( @@ -995,6 +1102,14 @@ def parse_command_line(): vmconn.add_argument('--ignore-config', '-g', action='store_true', help='Do not attempt to sanity check the guest config') + # Arguments related to secret injection + parser.add_argument('--disk-password', '-s', + help='Path to LUKS disk password to inject') + parser.add_argument('--secret-payload', + help='Path to file to write secret data payload to') + parser.add_argument('--secret-header', + help='Path to file to write secret data header to') + return parser.parse_args() @@ -1035,6 +1150,15 @@ def check_usage(args): raise UnsupportedUsageException( "Either --firmware or --domain is required") + if args.disk_password is not None: + if args.secret_header is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --secret-header or --domain is required") + + if args.secret_payload is None: + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Either --secret-payload or --domain is required") + sku = [args.cpu_family, args.cpu_model, args.cpu_stepping] if sku.count(None) == len(sku): if args.vmsa_cpu1 is not None and args.vmsa_cpu0 is None: @@ -1049,15 +1173,22 @@ def check_usage(args): raise UnsupportedUsageException( "CPU SKU needs family, model and stepping for SEV-ES domain") + secret = [args.secret_payload, args.secret_header] + if secret.count(None) > 0 and secret.count(None) != len(secret): + raise UnsupportedUsageException( + "Both --secret-payload and --secret-header are required") + def attest(args): if args.domain is None: - cvm = ConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, - api_major=args.api_major, - api_minor=args.api_minor, - build_id=args.build_id, - policy=args.policy, - num_cpus=args.num_cpus) + cvm = OfflineConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, + api_major=args.api_major, + api_minor=args.api_minor, + build_id=args.build_id, + policy=args.policy, + num_cpus=args.num_cpus, + secret_header=args.secret_header, + secret_payload=args.secret_payload) else: cvm = LibvirtConfidentialVM(measurement=args.measurement, api_major=args.api_major, @@ -1101,10 +1232,17 @@ def attest(args): args.ignore_config) cvm.attest() - if not args.quiet: print("OK: Looks good to me") + if args.disk_password: + cvm.secrets_table.load_disk_password(args.disk_password) + + cvm.inject_secrets() + if not args.quiet: + print("OK: Injected password") + + def main(): args = parse_command_line() if args.debug: -- 2.37.3

On 10/19/22 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> ---
diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 5ce5763d5b..2d15edb933 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -36,16 +36,19 @@
import abc import argparse -from base64 import b64decode +from base64 import b64decode, b64encode from hashlib import sha256 import hmac import logging +import os import re import socket from struct import pack import sys import traceback from uuid import UUID +from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, algorithms, modes +
from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -573,7 +576,26 @@ class KernelTable(GUIDTable): return entries
-class ConfidentialVM(object): +class SecretsTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{1e74f542-71dd-4d66-963e-ef4287ff173b}').bytes_le + DISK_PW_GUID = UUID('{736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=4) + self.disk_password = None + + def load_disk_password(self, path): + with open(path, 'rb') as fh: + self.disk_password = fh.read() + + def entries(self): + return self.build_entry(self.DISK_PW_GUID, + self.disk_password + bytes([0]), 4) +
This bytes([0]) NUL byte ends up in the efi_secret /sys path. Dropping it doesn't seem to impact injecting the secret at all FWIW once that's dropped, getting automatic luks unlock is really simple with /etc/crypttab + kernel 5.19 sed -i -e "s| none | /sys/kernel/security/secrets/coco/736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b |g" /etc/crypttab dracut --force --add-drivers efi_secret shutdown -r now Thanks, Cole

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 07:38:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 10/19/22 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> ---
diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 5ce5763d5b..2d15edb933 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -36,16 +36,19 @@
import abc import argparse -from base64 import b64decode +from base64 import b64decode, b64encode from hashlib import sha256 import hmac import logging +import os import re import socket from struct import pack import sys import traceback from uuid import UUID +from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, algorithms, modes +
from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -573,7 +576,26 @@ class KernelTable(GUIDTable): return entries
-class ConfidentialVM(object): +class SecretsTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{1e74f542-71dd-4d66-963e-ef4287ff173b}').bytes_le + DISK_PW_GUID = UUID('{736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=4) + self.disk_password = None + + def load_disk_password(self, path): + with open(path, 'rb') as fh: + self.disk_password = fh.read() + + def entries(self): + return self.build_entry(self.DISK_PW_GUID, + self.disk_password + bytes([0]), 4) +
This bytes([0]) NUL byte ends up in the efi_secret /sys path. Dropping it doesn't seem to impact injecting the secret at all
The specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst files does not specify anything in particular about the injected secret format. The rules for the format will vary according to the GUID used for the entry. In this case what I've called the DISK_PW_GUID is the same as the GUID used in James Bottomley's grub patch: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-12/msg00260.html In particular note + /* + * the passphrase must be a zero terminated string because the + * password routines call grub_strlen () to find its size + */ As written, the code just passes around a pointer to the data in the secret table, so it can't simply add a NUL terminator itself. See also James' python demo script for injection which adds a NUL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg03691.html
FWIW once that's dropped, getting automatic luks unlock is really simple with /etc/crypttab + kernel 5.19
sed -i -e "s| none | /sys/kernel/security/secrets/coco/736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b |g" /etc/crypttab dracut --force --add-drivers efi_secret shutdown -r now
Now one option here is to invent a different GUID and call it the "CRYTPTAB_PW_GUID", and have the host side injection tools not use a NUL terminator for this option. What I don't like about this is that in both cases we're just passing in the same data - a passphrase for unlocking a LUKS keyslot. IMHO, we should have a "LUKS_PASSPHARSE_GUID" secret entry which can be consumed by any software that wants to unlock LUKS, not have software specific GUIDs. The crypttab keyfiles can contain arbitrary bytes, so we can't just drop the trailing NUL as that might be relevant key material. Reading cryttab(5) I see that /etc/crypttab supports an option called 'keyfile-size', which could be used to truncate the file. That's not at all user friendly for us, as the user pw data can be arbitrary length and when building the disk image template we don't know how many bytes are sensitive.IOW, we can't predict what keyfile-size to use. So it seems we have a few options 1. modify grub patches to remove the requirement for NUL termination 2. modify systemd to add a 'keyfile-nul-terminated' option to instruct it to stip a trailing NUL from key-file. 3. modify systemd to add a 'efi-secret=UUID' option and ignore key-file field entirely Incidentally I think we should document well known secret GUIDs in specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

On 26/10/2022 12:59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 07:38:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 10/19/22 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> ---
diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 5ce5763d5b..2d15edb933 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -36,16 +36,19 @@
import abc import argparse -from base64 import b64decode +from base64 import b64decode, b64encode from hashlib import sha256 import hmac import logging +import os import re import socket from struct import pack import sys import traceback from uuid import UUID +from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, algorithms, modes +
from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -573,7 +576,26 @@ class KernelTable(GUIDTable): return entries
-class ConfidentialVM(object): +class SecretsTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{1e74f542-71dd-4d66-963e-ef4287ff173b}').bytes_le + DISK_PW_GUID = UUID('{736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=4) + self.disk_password = None + + def load_disk_password(self, path): + with open(path, 'rb') as fh: + self.disk_password = fh.read() + + def entries(self): + return self.build_entry(self.DISK_PW_GUID, + self.disk_password + bytes([0]), 4) +
This bytes([0]) NUL byte ends up in the efi_secret /sys path. Dropping it doesn't seem to impact injecting the secret at all
The specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst files does not specify anything in particular about the injected secret format. The rules for the format will vary according to the GUID used for the entry. In this case what I've called the DISK_PW_GUID is the same as the GUID used in James Bottomley's grub patch:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-12/msg00260.html
In particular note
+ /* + * the passphrase must be a zero terminated string because the + * password routines call grub_strlen () to find its size + */
As written, the code just passes around a pointer to the data in the secret table, so it can't simply add a NUL terminator itself.
See also James' python demo script for injection which adds a NUL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg03691.html
FWIW once that's dropped, getting automatic luks unlock is really simple with /etc/crypttab + kernel 5.19
sed -i -e "s| none | /sys/kernel/security/secrets/coco/736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b |g" /etc/crypttab dracut --force --add-drivers efi_secret shutdown -r now
I'm not an initrd expert, but maybe there's a way to run an early script (before cryptsetup) that will peel that terminating NUL: head -c -1 /sys/kernel/security/secrets/coco/736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b > /tmp/luks_key and then use /tmp/luks_key in /etc/crypttab. Of course /tmp/luks_key isn't a secure place, so need to find the correct location for this.
Now one option here is to invent a different GUID and call it the "CRYTPTAB_PW_GUID", and have the host side injection tools not use a NUL terminator for this option.
and then modify the Grub patch (option 1 below) to read from the new GUID, copy the value, and add the NUL byte.
What I don't like about this is that in both cases we're just passing in the same data - a passphrase for unlocking a LUKS keyslot.
IMHO, we should have a "LUKS_PASSPHARSE_GUID" secret entry which can be consumed by any software that wants to unlock LUKS, not have software specific GUIDs.
The crypttab keyfiles can contain arbitrary bytes, so we can't just drop the trailing NUL as that might be relevant key material.
Note that grub and cryptsetup are not identical -- I think that (currently) the grub patches do not support binary passphrases (that may include NUL bytes), whereas cryptsetup keyfile can be have binary content. But I'm not following grub-devel closely.
Reading cryttab(5) I see that /etc/crypttab supports an option called 'keyfile-size', which could be used to truncate the file. That's not at all user friendly for us, as the user pw data can be arbitrary length and when building the disk image template we don't know how many bytes are sensitive.IOW, we can't predict what keyfile-size to use.
So it seems we have a few options
1. modify grub patches to remove the requirement for NUL termination 2. modify systemd to add a 'keyfile-nul-terminated' option to instruct it to stip a trailing NUL from key-file. 3. modify systemd to add a 'efi-secret=UUID' option and ignore key-file field entirely
Debian's crypttab supports keyscript=/path/to/script which should output the passphrase to stdout. This is very generic and can allow us to: 1. check a few GUIDs (fallback) 2. drop terminating NUL 3. for SNP-style late attestation: fetch attestation report, contact the KBS, and retrieve the key (see AMD's example [1]) [1] https://github.com/AMDESE/sev-guest/tree/main/attestation/cryptsetup-initram... But there's no keyscript option in systemd...
Incidentally I think we should document well known secret GUIDs in specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst.
The only others I know are used in confidential-containers attestation agent (offline_sev_kbc [2] and online_sev_kbc [3]). [2] https://github.com/confidential-containers/attestation-agent/blob/6e4a249dfb... [3] https://github.com/confidential-containers/attestation-agent/blob/6e4a249dfb... -Dov

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 03:34:00PM +0300, Dov Murik wrote:
On 26/10/2022 12:59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 07:38:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 10/19/22 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> ---
diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate index 5ce5763d5b..2d15edb933 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -36,16 +36,19 @@
import abc import argparse -from base64 import b64decode +from base64 import b64decode, b64encode from hashlib import sha256 import hmac import logging +import os import re import socket from struct import pack import sys import traceback from uuid import UUID +from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, algorithms, modes +
from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -573,7 +576,26 @@ class KernelTable(GUIDTable): return entries
-class ConfidentialVM(object): +class SecretsTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{1e74f542-71dd-4d66-963e-ef4287ff173b}').bytes_le + DISK_PW_GUID = UUID('{736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=4) + self.disk_password = None + + def load_disk_password(self, path): + with open(path, 'rb') as fh: + self.disk_password = fh.read() + + def entries(self): + return self.build_entry(self.DISK_PW_GUID, + self.disk_password + bytes([0]), 4) +
This bytes([0]) NUL byte ends up in the efi_secret /sys path. Dropping it doesn't seem to impact injecting the secret at all
The specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst files does not specify anything in particular about the injected secret format. The rules for the format will vary according to the GUID used for the entry. In this case what I've called the DISK_PW_GUID is the same as the GUID used in James Bottomley's grub patch:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-12/msg00260.html
In particular note
+ /* + * the passphrase must be a zero terminated string because the + * password routines call grub_strlen () to find its size + */
As written, the code just passes around a pointer to the data in the secret table, so it can't simply add a NUL terminator itself.
See also James' python demo script for injection which adds a NUL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg03691.html
FWIW once that's dropped, getting automatic luks unlock is really simple with /etc/crypttab + kernel 5.19
sed -i -e "s| none | /sys/kernel/security/secrets/coco/736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b |g" /etc/crypttab dracut --force --add-drivers efi_secret shutdown -r now
I'm not an initrd expert, but maybe there's a way to run an early script (before cryptsetup) that will peel that terminating NUL:
head -c -1 /sys/kernel/security/secrets/coco/736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec-06879ce3da0b > /tmp/luks_key
and then use /tmp/luks_key in /etc/crypttab.
Of course /tmp/luks_key isn't a secure place, so need to find the correct location for this.
I'm slightly adverse to adding custom scripts, because I find it very compelling for the LUKS unlock solution to be something that is possible using only stuff in the base systemd implementation. That gives us a guarantee that it will work in any distro that supports systemd (of a new enough version). This would imply that custom script would need to be added to systemd, at which point we might as well just avoid the script.
Now one option here is to invent a different GUID and call it the "CRYTPTAB_PW_GUID", and have the host side injection tools not use a NUL terminator for this option.
and then modify the Grub patch (option 1 below) to read from the new GUID, copy the value, and add the NUL byte.
What I don't like about this is that in both cases we're just passing in the same data - a passphrase for unlocking a LUKS keyslot.
IMHO, we should have a "LUKS_PASSPHARSE_GUID" secret entry which can be consumed by any software that wants to unlock LUKS, not have software specific GUIDs.
The crypttab keyfiles can contain arbitrary bytes, so we can't just drop the trailing NUL as that might be relevant key material.
Note that grub and cryptsetup are not identical -- I think that (currently) the grub patches do not support binary passphrases (that may include NUL bytes), whereas cryptsetup keyfile can be have binary content. But I'm not following grub-devel closely.
Hmm, yes, the problem is more general than just the trailing NUL. Machine generated recovery keys can contain arbitrary embedded NULs, which is fundamentally incompatible with the grub patches today. So I guess we really do need to invent a new GUID explicitly for LUKS keys supporting the full 8-bit binary space, and document at the existing Grub targetted GUID is a limited design.
Reading cryttab(5) I see that /etc/crypttab supports an option called 'keyfile-size', which could be used to truncate the file. That's not at all user friendly for us, as the user pw data can be arbitrary length and when building the disk image template we don't know how many bytes are sensitive.IOW, we can't predict what keyfile-size to use.
So it seems we have a few options
1. modify grub patches to remove the requirement for NUL termination 2. modify systemd to add a 'keyfile-nul-terminated' option to instruct it to stip a trailing NUL from key-file. 3. modify systemd to add a 'efi-secret=UUID' option and ignore key-file field entirely
Debian's crypttab supports keyscript=/path/to/script which should output the passphrase to stdout. This is very generic and can allow us to:
1. check a few GUIDs (fallback) 2. drop terminating NUL 3. for SNP-style late attestation: fetch attestation report, contact the KBS, and retrieve the key (see AMD's example [1])
[1] https://github.com/AMDESE/sev-guest/tree/main/attestation/cryptsetup-initram...
But there's no keyscript option in systemd...
The keyfile path can, however, point to a AF_UNIX socket path. So you can have a script on the other end of the path that does anything at all. Still as per my earlier point, I find it very appealing to have a solution not reliant on us writing an extension script. So I'm again inclined to change my mind and say we SHOULD invent a new GUID for full 8-bit binary LUKS unlock keys, distinct from the previous grub GUID.
Incidentally I think we should document well known secret GUIDs in specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst.
The only others I know are used in confidential-containers attestation agent (offline_sev_kbc [2] and online_sev_kbc [3]).
[2] https://github.com/confidential-containers/attestation-agent/blob/6e4a249dfb... [3] https://github.com/confidential-containers/attestation-agent/blob/6e4a249dfb...
With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

On 26/10/2022 15:51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 03:34:00PM +0300, Dov Murik wrote:
On 26/10/2022 12:59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 07:38:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 10/19/22 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
[...]
Reading cryttab(5) I see that /etc/crypttab supports an option called 'keyfile-size', which could be used to truncate the file. That's not at all user friendly for us, as the user pw data can be arbitrary length and when building the disk image template we don't know how many bytes are sensitive.IOW, we can't predict what keyfile-size to use.
So it seems we have a few options
1. modify grub patches to remove the requirement for NUL termination 2. modify systemd to add a 'keyfile-nul-terminated' option to instruct it to stip a trailing NUL from key-file. 3. modify systemd to add a 'efi-secret=UUID' option and ignore key-file field entirely
Debian's crypttab supports keyscript=/path/to/script which should output the passphrase to stdout. This is very generic and can allow us to:
1. check a few GUIDs (fallback) 2. drop terminating NUL 3. for SNP-style late attestation: fetch attestation report, contact the KBS, and retrieve the key (see AMD's example [1])
[1] https://github.com/AMDESE/sev-guest/tree/main/attestation/cryptsetup-initram...
But there's no keyscript option in systemd...
The keyfile path can, however, point to a AF_UNIX socket path. So you can have a script on the other end of the path that does anything at all. Still as per my earlier point, I find it very appealing to have a solution not reliant on us writing an extension script.
Credit should be given to James who insisted that the efi_secret kernel module will expose a simple filesystem interface to read the secrets, which allows using crypttab's keyfile without other changes. I think this is the correct solution here. BTW one more thing a scripted approach can do (maybe not with keyscript=...) is unlink the coco/secrets/... file after cryptsetup luksOpen. efi_secret module will then remove the file entry and wipe the memory. This will prevent access to the disk passphrase (for example if an attacker got root access to *read* arbitrary files); maybe that's a security benefit. The downside is that it would prevent kexec or re-opening the luks partition. Aside, we can start thinking about initrd/cryptsetup for SNP/TDX attestation + secret retrieval which require network support, crypto, and more complex logic (which shouldn't be inside systemd). Maybe the clevis people have a plan for the more complex key releases (where the key is not simply a file). -Dov

On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 10:59 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 07:38:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 10/19/22 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- diff --git a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate b/tools/virt-qemu-sev- validate index 5ce5763d5b..2d15edb933 100755 --- a/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate +++ b/tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate @@ -36,16 +36,19 @@
import abc import argparse -from base64 import b64decode +from base64 import b64decode, b64encode from hashlib import sha256 import hmac import logging +import os import re import socket from struct import pack import sys import traceback from uuid import UUID +from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, algorithms, modes +
from lxml import etree import libvirt @@ -573,7 +576,26 @@ class KernelTable(GUIDTable): return entries
-class ConfidentialVM(object): +class SecretsTable(GUIDTable): + + TABLE_GUID = UUID('{1e74f542-71dd-4d66-963e- ef4287ff173b}').bytes_le + DISK_PW_GUID = UUID('{736869e5-84f0-4973-92ec- 06879ce3da0b}').bytes_le + + def __init__(self): + super().__init__(guid=self.TABLE_GUID, + lenlen=4) + self.disk_password = None + + def load_disk_password(self, path): + with open(path, 'rb') as fh: + self.disk_password = fh.read() + + def entries(self): + return self.build_entry(self.DISK_PW_GUID, + self.disk_password + bytes([0]), 4) +
This bytes([0]) NUL byte ends up in the efi_secret /sys path. Dropping it doesn't seem to impact injecting the secret at all
The specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst files does not specify anything in particular about the injected secret format. The rules for the format will vary according to the GUID used for the entry. In this case what I've called the DISK_PW_GUID is the same as the GUID used in James Bottomley's grub patch:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-12/msg00260.html
That's way too old; the latest version is here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-02/msg00064.html The specific change was to update to use the new disk protector API.
In particular note
+ /* + * the passphrase must be a zero terminated string because the + * password routines call grub_strlen () to find its size + */
As written, the code just passes around a pointer to the data in the secret table, so it can't simply add a NUL terminator itself.
See also James' python demo script for injection which adds a NUL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg03691.html
Which makes all of this unnecessary. The disk protector API takes a pointer and a length, so no longer needs to call grub_strlen on the data. Thus if we don't need backwards compatibility (or older versions of grub have the disk protector API backported), the trailing NULL can be removed. The patch here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-02/msg00065.html Still has the grub_strlen, but it's now in the patch series not grub itself so it could be eliminated by expanding the get API to retrieve the length as well as the secret. James

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 08:52:24AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 10:59 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 07:38:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
This bytes([0]) NUL byte ends up in the efi_secret /sys path. Dropping it doesn't seem to impact injecting the secret at all
The specs/sev-guest-firmware.rst files does not specify anything in particular about the injected secret format. The rules for the format will vary according to the GUID used for the entry. In this case what I've called the DISK_PW_GUID is the same as the GUID used in James Bottomley's grub patch:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-12/msg00260.html
That's way too old; the latest version is here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-02/msg00064.html
The specific change was to update to use the new disk protector API.
Ah thanks, I should have googled harder !
In particular note
+ /* + * the passphrase must be a zero terminated string because the + * password routines call grub_strlen () to find its size + */
As written, the code just passes around a pointer to the data in the secret table, so it can't simply add a NUL terminator itself.
See also James' python demo script for injection which adds a NUL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg03691.html
Which makes all of this unnecessary. The disk protector API takes a pointer and a length, so no longer needs to call grub_strlen on the data. Thus if we don't need backwards compatibility (or older versions of grub have the disk protector API backported), the trailing NULL can be removed.
Assuming no distros have shipped with the not-yet-merged grub patches applied to their builds, I'd suggest we can ignore backwards compatibility concerns, and just focus on what will eventually be merged in grub upstream....
The patch here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-02/msg00065.html
Still has the grub_strlen, but it's now in the patch series not grub itself so it could be eliminated by expanding the get API to retrieve the length as well as the secret.
....which suggests we can just go for eliminating the strlen call and document that the existing GUID is intended to be 8-bit clean for binary keys, with no trailing NUL present. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

On 19/10/2022 13:17, berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrangé) wrote:
It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang? <berrange at redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 66 ++++++++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index fcc13d68c8..7542bea9aa 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -187,6 +187,29 @@ understand any configuration mistakes that have been made. If the will be skipped. The result is that the validation will likely be reported as failed.
+Secret injection options +------------------------ + +These options provide a way to inject a secret if validation of the +launch measurement passes. + +``--disk-password PATH`` + +Path to a file containing the password to use to unlock the LUKS container +for the guest disk.
Maybe add an option to add custom secret entries: --add-secret-entry GUID:PATH ? -Dov
+ +``--secret-header PATH`` + +Path to a file in which the injected secret header will be written in base64 +format and later injected into the domain. This is required if there is no +connection to libvirt, otherwise the secret will be directly injected. + +``--secret-payload PATH`` + +Path to a file in which the injected secret payload will be written in base64 +format and later injected into the domain. This is required if there is no +connection to libvirt, otherwise the secret will be directly injected. +

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 03:47:12PM +0300, Dov Murik wrote:
On 19/10/2022 13:17, berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrangé) wrote:
It is possible to build OVMF for SEV with an embedded Grub that can fetch LUKS disk secrets. This adds support for injecting secrets in the required format.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang? <berrange at redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 66 ++++++++++ tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index fcc13d68c8..7542bea9aa 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -187,6 +187,29 @@ understand any configuration mistakes that have been made. If the will be skipped. The result is that the validation will likely be reported as failed.
+Secret injection options +------------------------ + +These options provide a way to inject a secret if validation of the +launch measurement passes. + +``--disk-password PATH`` + +Path to a file containing the password to use to unlock the LUKS container +for the guest disk.
Maybe add an option to add custom secret entries:
--add-secret-entry GUID:PATH
?
Yeah, I was just thinking the same. I'll respin with --disk-password removed, and instead allow --inject GUID:PATH --inject NAME:PATH where 'NAME' can refer to any well known GUIDs, so most fo the time in the common case people can do: --inject luks-key:/some/path instead of --inject IMPOSSIBLE-TO-RMEMBER-UUID:/some/poath and of course allow --inject multiple times too. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

Expand the SEV guest kbase guide with information about how to configure a SEV/SEV-ES guest when attestation is required, and mention the use of virt-qemu-sev-validate as a way to confirm it. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/kbase/launch_security_sev.rst | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/kbase/launch_security_sev.rst b/docs/kbase/launch_security_sev.rst index 2734832487..7f692af748 100644 --- a/docs/kbase/launch_security_sev.rst +++ b/docs/kbase/launch_security_sev.rst @@ -206,6 +206,20 @@ libvirt to the correct OVMF binary. </os> ... +If intending to attest the boot measurement, it is required to use a +firmware binary that is stateless, as persistent NVRAM can undermine +the trust of the secure guest. This is achieved by telling libvirt +that a stateless binary is required + +:: + + ... + <os type='efi'> + <type arch='x86_64' machine='q35'>hvm</type> + <loader stateless='yes'/> + </os> + ... + Memory ------ @@ -373,6 +387,97 @@ running: # dmesg | grep -i sev AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) active +Guest attestation for SEV/SEV-ES from a trusted host +==================================================== + +Before a confidential guest is used, it may be desirable to attest the boot +measurement. To be trustworthy the attestation process needs to be performed +from a machine that is already trusted. This would typically be a physical +machine that the guest owner controls, or could be a previously launched +confidential guest that has already itself been attested. Most notably, it is +**not** possible to securely attest a guest from the hypervisor host itself, +as the goal of the attestation process is to detect whether the hypervisor is +malicious. + +Performing an attestation requires that the ``<launchSecurity>`` element is +configured with a guest owner Diffie-Hellman (DH) certificate, and a session +data blob. These must be unique for every guest launch attempt. Any reuse will +open avenues of attack for the hypervisor to fake the measurement. Unique data +can be generated using the `sevctl <https://github.com/virtee/sevctl>`_ tool. + +First of all the Platform Diffie-Hellman key (PDH) for the hypervisor host +needs to be obtained. The PDH is used to negotiate a master secret between +the SEV firmware and external entities. + +The admin of the hypervisor can extract the PDH using:: + + $ sevctl export --full ${hostname}.pdh + +Upon receiving the PDH associated with the hypervisor, the guest owner should +validate its integrity:: + + $ sevctl verify --sev ${hostname}.pdh + PDH EP384 D256 008cec87d6bd9df67a35e7d6057a933463cd8a02440f60c5df150821b5662ee0 + ⬑ PEK EP384 E256 431ba88424378200d58b6fb5db9657268c599b1be25f8047ac2e2981eff667e6 + •⬑ OCA EP384 E256 b4f1d0a2144186d1aa9c63f19039834e729f508000aa05a76ba044f8e1419765 + ⬑ CEK EP384 E256 22c27ee3c1c33287db24d3c06869a5ae933eb44148fdb70838019e267077c6b8 + ⬑ ASK R4096 R384 d8cd9d1798c311c96e009a91552f17b4ddc4886a064ec933697734965b9ab29db803c79604e2725658f0861bfaf09ad4 + •⬑ ARK R4096 R384 3d2c1157c29ef7bd4207fc0c8b08db080e579ceba267f8c93bec8dce73f5a5e2e60d959ac37ea82176c1a0c61ae203ed + + • = self signed, ⬑ = signs, •̷ = invalid self sign, ⬑̸ = invalid signs + +Assuming this is successful, it is now possible to generate a unique launch +data for the guest boot attempt:: + + $ sevctl session --name ${myvmname} ${hostname}.pdh ${policy} + +This will generate four files + + * ``${myvmname}_tik.bin`` + * ``${myvmname}_tek.bin`` + * ``${myvmname}_godh.bin`` + * ``${myvmname}_session.bin`` + +The ``tik.bin`` and ``tek.bin`` files will be needed to perform the boot +attestation, and must be kept somewhere secure, away from the hypervisor +host. + +The ``godh.bin`` file contents should be copied into the ``<dhCert>`` field +in the ``<launchSecurity>`` configuration, while the ``session.bin`` file +contents should be copied into the ``<session>`` field. + +When launching the guest, it should be set to remain in the paused state with +no vCPUs running:: + + $ virsh start --paused ${myvmname} + +With it launched, it is possible to query the launch measurement:: + + $ virsh domlaunchsecinfo ${myvmname} + sev-measurement: LMnv8i8N2QejezMPkscShF0cyPYCslgUoCxGWRqQuyt0Q0aUjVkH/T6NcmkwZkWp + sev-api-major : 0 + sev-api-minor : 24 + sev-build-id : 15 + sev-policy : 3 + +The techiques required to validate the measurement reported are beyond the +scope of this document. Fortunately, libvirt provides a tool that can be used +to perform this validation:: + + $ virt-qemu-sev-validate \ + --measurement LMnv8i8N2QejezMPkscShF0cyPYCslgUoCxGWRqQuyt0Q0aUjVkH/T6NcmkwZkWp + --api-major 0 + --api-minor 24 + --build-id 15 + --policy 3 + --tik ${myvmname}_tik.bin + --tek ${myvmname}_tek.bin + OK: Looks good to me + +The `man page <../manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.html>`__ for +``virt-qemu-sev-validate`` outlines a great many other ways to invoke this +tool. + Limitations =========== -- 2.37.3

In general we expect to be able to construct a SEV-ES VMSA blob from knowledge about the AMD achitectural CPU register defaults, KVM setup and QEMU setup. If any of this unexpectedly changes, figuring out what's wrong could be horrible. This systemtap script demonstrates how to capture the real VMSA that is used for a SEV-ES as it is booted. The captured data can be fed into the 'sevctl vmsa show' command in order to produce formatted info with named registers, allowing a 'diff' to be performed. This script will need updating for any kernel version that is not 6.0, to set the correct line numbers. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp diff --git a/examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp b/examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..551ed739b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +#!/usr/bin/stap +# +# Copyright (C) 2022 Red Hat, Inc. +# +# This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +# modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public +# License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either +# version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +# +# This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU +# Lesser General Public License for more details. +# +# You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public +# License along with this library. If not, see +# <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. +# +# A script that captures the VMSA blob for the boot vCPU and +# first additional vCPU, when a KVM guest is booted with SEV-ES +# +# The captured VMSA will be printed to the console in hex format, +# and can be converted to the required binary format by feeding +# it through +# +# perl -e 'while (<>) { print pack("C64", map { hex($_) } ( $_ =~ m/../g )); }' > vmsa.bin +# + +probe begin { + printf("Running\n") +} + +function dump_vmsa(addr:long) { + printf("VMSA\n") + for (i = 0; i < 4096 ; i+= 64) { + printf("%.64M\n", addr + i); + } +} + +# This line number will need to be updated for the specific kernel +# version that is being probed. The line that needs to be targetted +# is the one beween the call to clflush_cache_range(...) and the +# call to sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_LAUNCH_UPDATE...). +# +# Line 632 is correct for Linux v6.0 +probe module("kvm_amd").statement("__sev_launch_update_vmsa@arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c:632") { + dump_vmsa($svm->vmsa) +} -- 2.37.3

Despite efforts to make the virt-qemu-sev-validate tool friendly, it is a certainty that almost everyone who tries it will hit false negative results, getting a failure despite the VM being trustworthy. Diagnosing these problems is no easy matter, especially for those not familiar with SEV/SEV-ES in general. This extra docs text attempts to set out a checklist of items to look at to identify what went wrong. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst index 7542bea9aa..e7dca2bb8b 100644 --- a/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst +++ b/docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst @@ -437,6 +437,122 @@ inject a disk password on success: --domain fedora34x86_64 \ --disk-password passwd.txt +COMMON MISTAKES CHECKLIST +========================= + +The complexity of configuring a guest and validating its boot measurement +means it is very likely to see the failure:: + + ERROR: Measurement does not match, VM is not trustworthy + +This error message assumes the worst, but in most cases will failure will be +a result of either mis-configuring the guest, or passing the wrong information +when trying to validate it. The following information is a guide for what +items to check in order to stand the best chance of diagnosing the problem + +* Check the VM configuration for the DH certificate and session + blob in the libvirt guest XML. + + The content for these fields should be in base64 format, which is + what ``sevctl session`` generates. Other tools may generate the files + in binary format, so ensure it has been correctly converted to base64. + +* Check the VM configuration policy value matches the session blob + + The ``<policy>`` value in libvirt guest XML has to match the value + passed to the ``sevctl session`` command. If this is mismatched + then the guest will not even start, and QEMU will show an error + such as:: + + sev_launch_start: LAUNCH_START ret=1 fw_error=11 'Bad measurement' + +* Check the correct TIK/TEK keypair are passed + + The TIK/TEK keypair are uniquely tied to each DH cert and session + blob. Make sure that the TIK/TEK keypair passed to this program + the ones matched to the DH cert and session blob configured for + the libvirt guest XML. This is one of the most common mistakes. + Further ensure that the TIK and TEK files are not swapped. + +* Check the firmware binary matches the one used to boot + + The firmware binary content is part of the data covered by the + launch measurement. Ensure that the firmware binary passed to + this program matches the one used to launch the guest. The + hypervisor host will periodically get software updates which + introduce a new firmware binary version. + +* Check the kernel, initrd and cmdline match the one used to boot + + If the guest is configured to use direct kernel boot, check that + the kernel, initrd and cmdline passed to this program match the + ones used to boot the guest. In the kernel cmdline whitespace + must be preserved exactly, including any leading or trailing + spaces. + +* Check whether the kernel hash measurement is enabled + + The ``kernelHashes`` property in the libvirt guest XML controls + whether hashes of the kernel, initrd and cmdline content are + covered by the boot measurement. If enabled, then the matching + content must be passed to this program. UIf disabled, then + the content must **NOT** be passed. + +* Check that the correct measurement hash is passed + + The measurement hash includes a nonce, so it will be different + on every boot attempt. Thus when validating the measuremnt it + is important ensure the most recent measurement is used. + +* Check the correct VMSA blobs / CPU SKU values for the host are used + + The VMSA blobs provide the initial register state for the + boot CPU and any additional CPUs. One of the registers + encodes the CPU SKU (family, model, stepping) of the physical + host CPU. Make sure that the VMSA blob used for validation + is one that matches the SKU of the host the guest is booted + on. Passing the CPU SKU values directly to the tool can + reduce the likelihood of using the wrong ones. + +* Check the CPU count is correct + + When passing VMSA blobs for SEV-ES guests, the number of CPUs + present will influence the measurement result. Ensure that the + correct vCPU count is used corresponding to the guest boot + attempt. + + +Best practice is to run this tool in completely offline mode and pass +all information as explicit command line parameters. When debugging +failures, however, it can be useful to tell it to connect to libvirt +and fetch information. If connecting to a remote libvirt instance, +it will fetch any information that can be trusted, which is the basic +VM launch state data. It will also sanity check the XML configuration +to identify some common mistakes. If the ``--insecure`` flag is passed +it can extract some configuration information and use that for the +attestation process. + +If the mistake still can't be identified, then this tool can be run +on the virtualization host. In that scenario the only three command +line parameters required are for the TIK, TEK and libvirt domain +name. It should be able to automatically determine all the other +information required. If it still reports a failure, this points +very strongly to the TIK/TEK pair not maching the configured +DH certificate and session blob. + +The ``--debug`` flag will display hashes and/or hex dumps for various +pieces of information used in the attestation process. Comparing the +``--debug`` output from running on the hypervisor host, against that +obtained when running in offline mode can give further guidance to +which parameter is inconsistent. + +As mentioned earlier in this document, bear in mind that in general +any attestation answers obtained from running on the hypervisor host +should not be trusted. So if a configuration mistake is identified +it is strongly recommended to re-run the attestation in offline mode +on a trusted machine. + + EXIT STATUS =========== -- 2.37.3

On 10/19/22 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
The libvirt QEMU driver provides all the functionality required for launching a guest on AMD SEV(-ES) platforms, with a configuration that enables attestation of the launch measurement. The documentation for how to actually perform an attestation is severely lacking and not suitable for mere mortals to understand. IOW, someone trying to implement attestation is in for a world of pain and suffering.
This series doesn't fix the documentation problem, but it does provide a reference implementation of a tool for performing attestation of SEV(-ES) guests in the context of libvirt / KVM.
There will be other tools and libraries that implement attestation logic too, but this tool is likely somewhat unique in its usage of libvirt. Now for a attestation to be trustworthy you don't want to perform it on the hypervisor host, since the goal is to prove that the hypervisor has not acted maliciously. None the less it is still beneficial to have libvirt integration to some extent.
When running this tool on a remote (trusted) host, it can connect to the libvirt hypervisor and fetch the data provided by the virDomainLaunchSecurityInfo API, which is safe to trust as the key pieces are cryptographically measured.
Attestation is a complex problem though and it is very easy to screw up and feed the wrong information and then waste hours trying to figure out what piece was wrong, to cause the hash digest to change. For debugging such problems, you can thus tell the tool to operate insecurely, by querying libvirt for almost all of the configuration information required to determine the expected measurement. By comparing these results,to the results obtained in offline mode it helps narrow down where the mistake lies.
So I view this tool as being useful in a number of ways:
* Quality assurance engineers needing to test libvirt/QEMU/KVM get a simple and reliable tool for automating tests with.
* Users running simple libvirt deployments without any large management stack, get a standalone tool for attestation they can rely on.
* Developers writing/integrating attestation support into management stacks above libvirt, get a reference against which they can debug their own tools.
* Users wanting to demonstrate the core SEV/SEV-ES functionality get a simple and reliable tool to illustrate the core concepts involved.
Since I didn't fancy writing such complex logic in C, this tool is a python3 program. As such, we don't want to include it in the main libvirt-client RPM, nor any other existing RPM. THus, this series puts it in a new libvirt-client-qemu RPM which, through no co-inicidence at all, is the same RPM I invented a few days ago to hold the virt-qemu-qmp-proxy command.
Note, people will have already seen an earlier version of this tool I hacked up some months ago. This code is very significantly changed since that earlier version, to make it more maintainable, and simpler to use (especially for SEV-ES) but the general theme is still the same.
Changed in v2:
- All the suggestions from Cole and Kashyap
Daniel P. Berrangé (12): build-aux: only forbid gethostname in C files tools: support validating SEV firmware boot measurements tools: load guest config from libvirt tools: support validating SEV direct kernel boot measurements tools: load direct kernel config from libvirt tools: support validating SEV-ES initial vCPU state measurements tools: support automatically constructing SEV-ES vCPU state tools: load CPU count and CPU SKU from libvirt tools: support generating SEV secret injection tables docs/kbase: describe attestation for SEV guests scripts: add systemtap script for capturing SEV-ES VMSA docs/manpages: add checklist of problems for SEV attestation
build-aux/syntax-check.mk | 1 + docs/kbase/launch_security_sev.rst | 105 ++ docs/manpages/meson.build | 1 + docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst | 647 +++++++++++ examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp | 48 + libvirt.spec.in | 2 + tools/meson.build | 5 + tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate | 1292 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 2101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/manpages/virt-qemu-sev-validate.rst create mode 100644 examples/systemtap/amd-sev-es-vmsa.stp create mode 100755 tools/virt-qemu-sev-validate
Reviewed-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> - Cole
participants (4)
-
Cole Robinson
-
Daniel P. Berrangé
-
Dov Murik
-
James Bottomley