On 05/22/2015 08:01 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
Some virsh commands have a size parameter, which is handled as
scaled
integer. We don't have any *feature* that would allow to use '-1' as
maximum size, so it's safe to reject any negative values for those
commands.
Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159171
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com>
---
tools/virsh.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
ACK, particularly since it gets hard to justify whether -1M and -1G
would mean the same "maximum size".
diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c
index 4425774..1005ba8 100644
--- a/tools/virsh.c
+++ b/tools/virsh.c
@@ -1811,7 +1811,7 @@ vshCommandOptScaledInt(const vshCmd *cmd, const char *name,
ret = vshCommandOptString(cmd, name, &str);
if (ret <= 0)
return ret;
- if (virStrToLong_ull(str, &end, 10, value) < 0 ||
+ if (virStrToLong_ullp(str, &end, 10, value) < 0 ||
virScaleInteger(value, end, scale, max) < 0)
return -1;
return 1;
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org