2011/7/4 Osier Yang <jyang(a)redhat.com>:
于 2011年07月04日 16:50, Matthias Bolte 写道:
>
> virFileMakePath returns an errno value on error, that will never be
> negative. So a virFileMakePath error whould have been ignored here.
s/whould/should/
No. Actually the typo is s/whould/would/, because an error would have
been ignored, but should have been reported instead.
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> index 363a361..aab3ab9 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> @@ -7498,7 +7498,7 @@ static int
> qemuDomainSnapshotWriteMetadata(virDomainObjPtr vm,
> goto cleanup;
> }
> err = virFileMakePath(snapDir);
> - if (err< 0) {
> + if (err != 0) {
> virReportSystemError(err, _("cannot create snapshot directory
> '%s'"),
> snapDir);
> goto cleanup;
ACK
Osier
Thanks, pushed with fixed commit message.
--
Matthias Bolte
http://photron.blogspot.com