8:53 p.m.
This are some additional features to libxl driver. Some of them require change
in domain config structures/syntax. Details described with each patch.
The last two patches are bugfix for deadlock during daemon startup.
PS Please keep me in To/Cc - I'm not subscribed to the list.
Marek Marczykowski (12):
libxl: allow script for any network interface, not only bridge
libxl: PCI passthrough support
libxl: nodeDevice* support for PCI devices
libxl: populate xenstore memory entries at startup
conf: add 'script' attribute to disk specification
libxl: use disk 'script' attribute
conf: support backend domain name in disk and network devices
libxl: support backend domain setting for disk and net devices
libxl: fill HVM SDL and VNC settings based on <graphics/> entries
RFC: libxl: special 'stubdom-dm' emulator to use qemu in stub domain
conf: virDomainObjListRemoveLocked function
libxl: fix deadlock in libxlReconnectDomain
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 14 ++
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 54 ++++++++
src/conf/domain_conf.h | 5 +
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
src/libxl/libxl_conf.h | 6 +-
src/libxl/libxl_driver.c | 253 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
7 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.4
9:34 p.m.
On 04/09/2013 07:53 PM, Marek Marczykowski wrote:
This are some additional features to libxl driver. Some of them
require change
in domain config structures/syntax. Details described with each patch.
The last two patches are bugfix for deadlock during daemon startup.
PS Please keep me in To/Cc - I'm not subscribed to the list.
It's list policy to reply-to-all; people who don't want an explicit cc
already use list manager features to suppress duplicates, and/or
Mail-Reply-To headers to tell reply-to-all how to behave.
Your patch series did not come through with any threading, which makes
it very hard to review. When using 'git send-email', it's good to send
a patch series to yourself before the list to make sure it will come
through correctly. You want each one of the messages (1/12, 2/12, etc)
to be marked In-Reply-To the Message-id of the 0/12 message.
It would be helpful if you could resend, so that all your patches are
properly threaded.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
9:50 p.m.
On 10.04.2013 04:34, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/09/2013 07:53 PM, Marek Marczykowski wrote:
> This are some additional features to libxl driver. Some of them require change
> in domain config structures/syntax. Details described with each patch.
> The last two patches are bugfix for deadlock during daemon startup.
>
> PS Please keep me in To/Cc - I'm not subscribed to the list.
It's list policy to reply-to-all; people who don't want an explicit cc
already use list manager features to suppress duplicates, and/or
Mail-Reply-To headers to tell reply-to-all how to behave.
Your patch series did not come through with any threading, which makes
it very hard to review. When using 'git send-email', it's good to send
a patch series to yourself before the list to make sure it will come
through correctly. You want each one of the messages (1/12, 2/12, etc)
to be marked In-Reply-To the Message-id of the 0/12 message.
It would be helpful if you could resend, so that all your patches are
properly threaded.
Done, sorry for the noise.
--
Best Regards / Pozdrawiam,
Marek Marczykowski
Invisible Things Lab
4244
days inactive
4244
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Eric Blake -
Marek Marczykowski