[PATCH] gitpublish: Drop "libvirt" from prefix
We're now using GitLab MRs for all subprojects, which makes having "libvirt" in the prefix no longer necessary and a pointless deviation from git-format-patch's default, which some people still use. Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- .gitpublish | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.gitpublish b/.gitpublish index d37bf4174a..2c9a6e909e 100644 --- a/.gitpublish +++ b/.gitpublish @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ [gitpublishprofile "default"] base = master to = libvir-list@redhat.com -prefix = libvirt PATCH +prefix = PATCH -- 2.35.1
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:11:42AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
We're now using GitLab MRs for all subprojects, which makes having "libvirt" in the prefix no longer necessary and a pointless deviation from git-format-patch's default, which some people still use.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- .gitpublish | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
NACK as I still think it's good to have the project name as part of the prefix. For example if some other mailing list is added to CC like we get mails from QEMU project without proper prefix. Pavel
diff --git a/.gitpublish b/.gitpublish index d37bf4174a..2c9a6e909e 100644 --- a/.gitpublish +++ b/.gitpublish @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ [gitpublishprofile "default"] base = master to = libvir-list@redhat.com -prefix = libvirt PATCH +prefix = PATCH -- 2.35.1
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:11:42AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
We're now using GitLab MRs for all subprojects, which makes having "libvirt" in the prefix no longer necessary and a pointless deviation from git-format-patch's default, which some people still use.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- .gitpublish | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
My view is unchanged from the last time you proposed this https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-March/216307.html This change is worse for no gain. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:35:41AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:11:42AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
We're now using GitLab MRs for all subprojects, which makes having "libvirt" in the prefix no longer necessary and a pointless deviation from git-format-patch's default, which some people still use.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> --- .gitpublish | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
My view is unchanged from the last time you proposed this
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-March/216307.html
This change is worse for no gain.
Alright, I'll post this again in a year, when I've completely forgotten about having already done so in the past O:-) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
participants (3)
-
Andrea Bolognani -
Daniel P. Berrangé -
Pavel Hrdina