2009/8/7 Chris Lalancette <clalance(a)redhat.com>:
While trying to remove uses of unsafe strncpy in the tree, I came
across a couple of usage in the ESX driver. To my eyes, the snprintf
replacements do the same thing in less code, and are also safer.
This has been compile tested only. Mattias, is there any reason we
can't use these simpler (and safer) string routines?
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance(a)redhat.com>
Cc: Mattias Bolte <matthias.bolte(a)googlemail.com>
---
src/esx/esx_vmx.c | 22 +++++++---------------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/esx/esx_vmx.c b/src/esx/esx_vmx.c
index af5234e..91a86e2 100644
--- a/src/esx/esx_vmx.c
+++ b/src/esx/esx_vmx.c
@@ -397,10 +397,7 @@ def->parallels[0]...
#define ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(_suffix) \
do { \
- strncpy(_suffix##_name, prefix, sizeof (_suffix##_name) - 1); \
- _suffix##_name[sizeof (_suffix##_name) - 1] = '\0'; \
- strncat(_suffix##_name, "."#_suffix,
\
- sizeof (_suffix##_name) - 1 - strlen(_suffix##_name)); \
+ snprintf(_suffix##_name, sizeof(_suffix##_name), "%s."#_suffix,
prefix); \
} while (0)
The do/while can be removed as the macro expands to only one statement now:
#define ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(_suffix) \
snprintf(_suffix##_name, sizeof(_suffix##_name), "%s."#_suffix, prefix) \
@@ -839,11 +836,9 @@ esxVMX_ParseSCSIController(virConnectPtr conn,
virConfPtr conf, int controller,
goto failure;
}
- strncpy(present_name, "scsiX.present", sizeof (virtualDev_name));
- strncpy(virtualDev_name, "scsiX.virtualDev", sizeof (virtualDev_name));
-
- present_name[4] = '0' + controller;
- virtualDev_name[4] = '0' + controller;
+ snprintf(present_name, sizeof(present_name), "scsi%d.present",
controller);
+ snprintf(virtualDev_name, sizeof(virtualDev_name), "scsi%d.virtualDev",
+ controller);
if (esxUtil_GetConfigBoolean(conn, conf, present_name, present, 0, 1) < 0) {
goto failure;
@@ -1333,8 +1328,7 @@ esxVMX_ParseEthernet(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf, int
controller,
goto failure;
}
- strncpy(prefix, "ethernetX", sizeof (prefix));
- prefix[8] = '0' + controller;
+ snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "ethernet%d", controller);
ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(present);
ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(startConnected);
@@ -1514,8 +1508,7 @@ esxVMX_ParseSerial(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf, int port,
goto failure;
}
- strncpy(prefix, "serialX", sizeof (prefix));
- prefix[6] = '0' + port;
+ snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "serial%d", port);
ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(present);
ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(startConnected);
@@ -1627,8 +1620,7 @@ esxVMX_ParseParallel(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf, int
port,
goto failure;
}
- strncpy(prefix, "parallelX", sizeof (prefix));
- prefix[8] = '0' + port;
+ snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "parallel%d", port);
ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(present);
ESX_BUILD_VMX_NAME(startConnected);
--
1.6.0.6
Just tested it, no objections beside the cosmetic one (do/while), ACK.
Matthias