Yes, 'goto cleanup' would be better. 2013/9/25 Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com&gt; > On 09/25/2013 07:49 AM, Hongwei Bi wrote: > > > > > > --- > > tools/virsh-domain.c | 4 +++- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/virsh-domain.c b/tools/virsh-domain.c > > index 856e888..f6d4edd 100644 > > --- a/tools/virsh-domain.c > > +++ b/tools/virsh-domain.c > > @@ -4487,8 +4487,10 @@ cmdDump(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) > > if (!(dom = vshCommandOptDomain(ctl, cmd, &name))) > > return false; > > > > - if (vshCommandOptStringReq(ctl, cmd, "file", &to) < 0) > > + if (vshCommandOptStringReq(ctl, cmd, "file", &to) < 0) { > > + virDomainFree(dom); > > return false; > > + } > > 'goto cleanup' would do the same and it's easier to read. > > Alternatively, if we moved vshCommandOptStringReq before > vshCommandOptDomain, > 'return false' would be enough. > > Jan >