On 22.01.2015 11:53, Peter Krempa wrote:
---
src/util/virbitmap.c | 6 ++++++
src/util/virbitmap.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virbitmap.c b/src/util/virbitmap.c
index 05c50e4..d5b0035 100644
--- a/src/util/virbitmap.c
+++ b/src/util/virbitmap.c
@@ -504,6 +504,12 @@ bool virBitmapEqual(virBitmapPtr b1, virBitmapPtr b2)
virBitmapPtr tmp;
size_t i;
+ if (!b1 && !b2)
+ return true;
+
+ if (!b1 || !b2)
+ return false;
+
if (b1->max_bit > b2->max_bit) {
tmp = b1;
b1 = b2;
diff --git a/src/util/virbitmap.h b/src/util/virbitmap.h
index 565264c..a347f0a 100644
--- a/src/util/virbitmap.h
+++ b/src/util/virbitmap.h
@@ -84,8 +84,7 @@ virBitmapPtr virBitmapNewData(void *data, int len)
ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1);
int virBitmapToData(virBitmapPtr bitmap, unsigned char **data, int *dataLen)
ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2);
-bool virBitmapEqual(virBitmapPtr b1, virBitmapPtr b2)
- ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2);
+bool virBitmapEqual(virBitmapPtr b1, virBitmapPtr b2);
size_t virBitmapSize(virBitmapPtr bitmap)
ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1);
There are some places in the code that already call this and do the
checks you're introducing. Can we drop the duplicity then?
Michal