On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 01:24:25PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > See https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-July/msg00493.html > > Basically building against librbd doesn't seem to actually require -lcrypto. > > Also report the rbd linker flags in configure output > > Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com&gt; > --- > configure.ac | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index d45f4f1..ae814cb 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1999,7 +1999,7 @@ if test "$with_storage_rbd" = "yes" || test "$with_storage_rbd" = "check"; then > > if test "$LIBRBD_FOUND" = "yes"; then > with_storage_rbd=yes > - LIBRBD_LIBS="-lrbd -lrados -lcrypto" > + LIBRBD_LIBS="-lrbd -lrados" > AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([WITH_STORAGE_RBD], [1], > [whether RBD backend for storage driver is enabled]) > else > @@ -2962,6 +2962,12 @@ AC_MSG_NOTICE([ xdr: $XDR_CFLAGS]) > else > AC_MSG_NOTICE([ xdr: no]) > fi > +if test "$with_storage_rbd" = "yes" ; then > +AC_MSG_NOTICE([ rbd: $LIBRBD_LIBS]) > +else > +AC_MSG_NOTICE([ rbd: no]) > +fi > + > AC_MSG_NOTICE([]) > AC_MSG_NOTICE([Test suite]) > AC_MSG_NOTICE([]) ACK Daniel