[libvirt] [PATCH] spec: Update version check for maint Source URL
New maint release version numbers of just A.B.C format, not the old A.B.C.D format. Adjust the check that dynamically changes the Source URL for maint releases --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index b249224..734b187 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ Group: Development/Libraries BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root URL: http://libvirt.org/ -%if %(echo %{version} | grep -o \\. | wc -l) == 3 +%if %(echo %{version} | grep -q "\.0$"; echo $?) == 1 %define mainturl stable_updates/ %endif Source: http://libvirt.org/sources/%{?mainturl}libvirt-%{version}.tar.xz -- 2.9.3
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 20:08 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
New maint release version numbers of just A.B.C format, not the old A.B.C.D format. Adjust the check that dynamically changes the Source URL for maint releases --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Acked-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 20:08 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
New maint release version numbers of just A.B.C format, not the old A.B.C.D format. Adjust the check that dynamically changes the Source URL for maint releases --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
By the way, the machinery to deal with mainteinance release is missing altogether from mingw-libvirt.spec.in, shouldn't we add it there as well? -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
On 05/09/2017 11:57 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 20:08 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
New maint release version numbers of just A.B.C format, not the old A.B.C.D format. Adjust the check that dynamically changes the Source URL for maint releases --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
By the way, the machinery to deal with mainteinance release is missing altogether from mingw-libvirt.spec.in, shouldn't we add it there as well?
Yes I think so, I've just never done a mingw build so didn't consider it Thanks, Cole
participants (2)
-
Andrea Bolognani -
Cole Robinson