On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:08:09AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> While LOCAL_PEERCRED on the BSDs does not return the pid information of
> the peer, Mac OS X 10.8 added LOCAL_PEERPID to retrieve the pid so we
> should use that when its available to get that information.
> ---
> v2:
> * Make LOCAL_PEERPID call non-fatal in case the user built the binary on
> a system that supports it but then runs it on a kernel that does not
> support it
> ---
> src/rpc/virnetsocket.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c b/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c
> index e8cdfa6..7126c4f 100644
> --- a/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c
> +++ b/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c
> @@ -1195,12 +1195,29 @@ int virNetSocketGetUNIXIdentity(virNetSocketPtr sock,
> return -1;
> }
>
> - /* PID and process creation time are not supported on BSDs */
> + /* PID and process creation time are not supported on BSDs by
> + * LOCAL_PEERCRED.
> + */
> *pid = -1;
> *timestamp = -1;
> *uid = cr.cr_uid;
> *gid = cr.cr_gid;
>
> +# ifdef LOCAL_PEERPID
> + /* Exists on Mac OS X 10.8 for retrieving the peer's PID */
> + cr_len = sizeof(*pid);
> +
> + if (getsockopt(sock->fd, VIR_SOL_PEERCRED, LOCAL_PEERPID, pid, &cr_len)
< 0) {
> + virReportSystemError(errno, "%s",
> + _("Failed to get client socket PID"));
> + /* Don't treat this as fatal, but do set the value to something sane
> + * in case the user built this on a system that has LOCAL_PEERPID
> + * defined but the kernel does not actually support it.
> + */
> + *pid = -1;
You shouldn't call virReportSystemError if you're going to ignore the
error. I don't think we want to blindly ignore all errors though. Can
you find out what error older OS-X gives with this unsupported value
and just check for that. I'm guessing it'd probably be EINVAL.
Daniel
Can do.
--
Doug Goldstein