On 11/12/14 17:09, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Since QEMU 1.2.0, we switched to QMP probing instead of parsing -help
> (and other commands, such as -cpu ?) output. However, if QMP probing
> failed, we still tried starting QEMU with various options and parsing
> the output, which was guaranteed to fail because the output changed.
> Let's just refuse parsing -help for QEMU >= 1.2.0.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160318
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> index 74a3b24..bef96d5 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> @@ -1384,6 +1384,16 @@ int virQEMUCapsParseHelpStr(const char *qemu,
>
> *version = (major * 1000 * 1000) + (minor * 1000) + micro;
>
> + /* Refuse to parse -help output for QEMU releases >= 1.2.0 that should be
> + * using QMP probing.
> + */
> + if (*version > 1002000) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
> + _("QEMU %u.%u.%u is too new for help parsing"),
> + major, minor, micro);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> if (virQEMUCapsComputeCmdFlags(help, *version, *is_kvm, *kvm_version,
> qemuCaps, check_yajl) < 0)
> goto cleanup;
>
ACK, although I think that one of the steps that lead to fixing the
issue for the reporter was to purge the caps cache. As I've heard/seen
that happening we might want to check the code that checks the validity
of the cache.
Right, but in this case it's a bit more complicated because the thing
that changed and thus should have triggered caps regeneration was HW
configration. In other words, HW virt was turned on. Not something we
could easily consider when checking cache validity.
Jirka