There's no need to CC random developers - we are subscribed to the list. On 3/26/21 4:21 AM, wangjian wrote:> serialize access pci_get_strings function with a mutex.> > nodedev-init thread: > nodeStateInitializeEnumerate -> > udevEnumerateDevices-> > udevProcessDeviceListEntry -> > udevAddOneDevice -> > udevGetDeviceDetails-> > udevProcessPCI -> > udevTranslatePCIIds -> > pci_get_strings -> (libpciaccess) > find_device_name -> > populate_vendor -> > d = realloc( vend->devices, (vend->num_devices + 1), * sizeof( struct pci_device_leaf ) ); > vend->num_devices++; > > udev-event thread: > udevEventHandleThread -> > udevHandleOneDevice -> > udevAddOneDevice-> > udevGetDeviceDetails-> > udevProcessPCI -> > udevTranslatePCIIds -> > pci_get_strings -> (libpciaccess) > find_device_name -> > populate_vendor -> > d = realloc( vend->devices, (vend->num_devices + 1), * sizeof( struct pci_device_leaf ) ); > vend->num_devices++; > > Since the functions provided by libpciaccess are not thread-safe, > when the udev-event and nodedev-init threads of libvirt call > the pci_get_strings function provided by libpaciaccess at the same time. > It will appear that for the same address, realloc a large space first, > and then realloc a small space, which triggers the 'invalid next size' of realloc, > leading to the thread core. > > Signed-off-by: WangJian <wangjian161(a)huawei.com&gt; > --- > src/node_device/node_device_udev.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c > index 3f28858..cc752ba 100644 > --- a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c > +++ b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c > @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ udevGenerateDeviceName(struct udev_device *device, > return 0; > } > > +static pthread_mutex_t g_pciaccess_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; We tend to use virMutex (even though it is pthread_mutex under the hood). > > static int > udevTranslatePCIIds(unsigned int vendor, > @@ -350,11 +351,13 @@ udevTranslatePCIIds(unsigned int vendor, > m.match_data = 0; > > /* pci_get_strings returns void */ > + pthread_mutex_lock(&g_pciaccess_mutex); > pci_get_strings(&m, > &device_name, > &vendor_name, > NULL, > NULL); > + pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_pciaccess_mutex); > > *vendor_string = g_strdup(vendor_name); > *product_string = g_strdup(device_name); > Apart from that, the patch is correct. I'd squash this in and push if you agree: diff --git i/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c w/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c index cc752bad32..3daa5c90ad 100644 --- i/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c +++ w/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ udevGenerateDeviceName(struct udev_device *device, return 0; } -static pthread_mutex_t g_pciaccess_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; +static virMutex pciaccessMutex = VIR_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; static int udevTranslatePCIIds(unsigned int vendor, @@ -350,14 +350,14 @@ udevTranslatePCIIds(unsigned int vendor, m.device_class_mask = 0; m.match_data = 0; - /* pci_get_strings returns void */ - pthread_mutex_lock(&g_pciaccess_mutex); + /* pci_get_strings returns void and unfortunately is not thread safe. */ + virMutexLock(&pciaccessMutex); pci_get_strings(&m, &device_name, &vendor_name, NULL, NULL); - pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_pciaccess_mutex); + virMutexUnlock(&pciaccessMutex); *vendor_string = g_strdup(vendor_name); *product_string = g_strdup(device_name); Michal .