Under ./configure --without-numactl but with numactl-devel installed, the build fails with: ../../src/util/virnuma.c: In function 'virNumaNodeIsAvailable': ../../src/util/virnuma.c:407:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'numa_bitmask_isbitset' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] return numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node); ^ and other failures, all because the configure results for particular functions were used without regard to whether libnuma was even being linked in. * src/util/virnuma.c (virNumaGetPages): Fix message typo. (virNumaNodeIsAvailable): Correct build when not using numactl. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com&gt; --- Pushing under the build-breaker rule. src/util/virnuma.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/util/virnuma.c b/src/util/virnuma.c index 46f48d2..7a11a3b 100644 --- a/src/util/virnuma.c +++ b/src/util/virnuma.c @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ virNumaGetMaxCPUs(void) } -#ifdef HAVE_NUMA_BITMASK_ISBITSET +#if WITH_NUMACTL && HAVE_NUMA_BITMASK_ISBITSET /** * virNumaNodeIsAvailable: * @node: node to check @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ virNumaGetDistances(int node ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, { *distances = NULL; *ndistances = 0; - VIR_DEBUG("NUMA distance information isn't availble on this host"); + VIR_DEBUG("NUMA distance information isn't available on this host"); return 0; } #endif -- 1.9.3