On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:42:09PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > The changes in commit c7542573 introduced possible segfault. Looking > deeper into the code and the original code before the patch series were > applied I think that we should report error for each function failure > and also we shouldn't call some of the function twice. > > Found by coverity. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com&gt; > --- > src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c | 20 +++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c b/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c > index 2bc1842..3136be7 100644 > --- a/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c > +++ b/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c > @@ -87,24 +87,22 @@ virAccessDriverPolkitGetCaller(const char *actionid, > actionid); > return -1; > } > - if (virIdentityGetUNIXProcessID(identity, pid) < 0) > - goto cleanup; > - if (virIdentityGetUNIXProcessTime(identity, startTime) < 0) > - goto cleanup; > - if (virIdentityGetUNIXUserID(identity, uid) < 0) > - goto cleanup; > > - if (!pid) { > + if (virIdentityGetUNIXProcessID(identity, pid) < 0) { > virAccessError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s", > _("No UNIX process ID available")); > goto cleanup; > } > - > - if (virIdentityGetUNIXProcessTime(identity, startTime) < 0) > + if (virIdentityGetUNIXProcessTime(identity, startTime) < 0) { > + virAccessError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s", > + _("No UNIX process start time available")); > goto cleanup; > - > - if (virIdentityGetUNIXUserID(identity, uid) < 0) > + } > + if (virIdentityGetUNIXUserID(identity, uid) < 0) { > + virAccessError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s", > + _("No UNIX caller UID available")); > goto cleanup; > + } > ACK, that duplication comes from a merge rebase error. Regards, Daniel