[libvirt] [PATCH] post-release patch for symbols
Assuming we release a 0.5.1 soon. Maybe the code with threading should be on a 0.6.0 considering the amount of changes though. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:30:52AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Assuming we release a 0.5.1 soon. Maybe the code with threading should be on a 0.6.0 considering the amount of changes though.
Better to put it inside comments for now, because we don't really want an empty linker version section to be picked up unless we actually add new public symbols in this release.
Index: src/libvirt_sym.version.in =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/libxen/src/libvirt_sym.version.in,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 libvirt_sym.version.in --- src/libvirt_sym.version.in 21 Nov 2008 12:27:11 -0000 1.6 +++ src/libvirt_sym.version.in 2 Dec 2008 10:29:08 -0000 @@ -249,6 +249,8 @@
} LIBVIRT_0.4.5;
+LIBVIRT_0.5.1 { +} LIBVIRT_0.5.0; /* .... define new API here using predicted next version number .... */
Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
If I understood the previous conversation correctly, these thread-safe changes are necessary for the Java bindings DomainEvent code. Do we really want those bindings to fall that far behind? -----Original Message----- From: libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com on behalf of Daniel Veillard Sent: Tue 12/2/2008 5:30 AM To: libvir-list@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt] [PATCH] post-release patch for symbols Assuming we release a 0.5.1 soon. Maybe the code with threading should be on a 0.6.0 considering the amount of changes though. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:58:34AM -0500, Ben Guthro wrote:
If I understood the previous conversation correctly, these thread-safe changes are necessary for the Java bindings DomainEvent code.
Do we really want those bindings to fall that far behind?
I agree the java event support is pending the thread safe changes. When I suggested 0.6.0 that could be as well the next release (or the one just after). Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
participants (3)
-
Ben Guthro -
Daniel P. Berrange -
Daniel Veillard