On 04/10/2017 01:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 01:00:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 09:52 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>> In virpcimock we use some functions from utils so we should link
>> utils library to provide required symbols.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tests/Makefile.am | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am
>> index 279e9b7da8..8b9bba31ce 100644
>> --- a/tests/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.am
>> @@ -1131,7 +1131,8 @@ virpcimock_la_SOURCES = \
>> virpcimock.c
>> virpcimock_la_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS)
>> virpcimock_la_LDFLAGS = $(MOCKLIBS_LDFLAGS)
>> -virpcimock_la_LIBADD = $(MOCKLIBS_LIBS)
>> +virpcimock_la_LIBADD = $(MOCKLIBS_LIBS) \
>> + ../src/libvirt_util.la
>
> You forgot to include $(PROBES_O). But even with that added in, this will
> not fly. While you make it work under libvirt it fails without it because
> 'stat' is undefined but called. Look into virtestmock.c for explanation.
>
> I'm not sure how to address this issue. I know about it for quite some time
> now but all my previous attempts to fix it (including this one) failed. I've
> tried to mimic what virtestmock.c does, but without any luck.
What is the actual build problem with the virpcimock ? It seems to work
fine for me right now.
It does build fine. You want to run it under valgrind:
libvirt.git/tests $ ../run valgrind --trace-children=yes ./virpcitest
==30672== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==30672== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==30672== Using Valgrind-3.12.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==30672== Command: libvirt.git/tests/.libs/virpcitest
==30672==
valgrind: symbol lookup error: libvirt.git/tests/.libs/virpcimock.so: undefined symbol:
virFree
FWIW, the original intenion was that the mock impls should not use any
libvirt APIs, just pure POSIX / Linux APIs, so as to avoid dependancies
which could end up being circular.
Yeah, I was just about to suggests this. However, in general would it be a problem if a
mock library would link with say libvirt_utils statically? That way we shouldn't have
any dependency problems, should we?
Michal