[libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: The ppc64 target can run both ppc64 and ppc64le guests

When looking for a QEMU binary suitable for running ppc64le guests we have to take into account the fact that we use the QEMU target as key for the hash, so direct comparison is not good enough: normalize everything that can run on the ppc64 target to VIR_ARCH_PPC64 instead. This approach was already used in virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch(), and I've added a comment there to clarify why it's needed. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260753 --- src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c index 4ad1bdb..a06141e 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c @@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch(virArch hostarch, const char *archstr; char *binary; + /* qemu-system-ppc64 can run both ppc64 and ppc64le guests */ if (ARCH_IS_PPC64(guestarch)) archstr = virQEMUCapsArchToString(VIR_ARCH_PPC64); else @@ -3791,6 +3792,10 @@ virQEMUCapsCacheLookupByArch(virQEMUCapsCachePtr cache, virQEMUCapsPtr ret = NULL; struct virQEMUCapsSearchData data = { .arch = arch }; + /* QEMU's ppc64 target can run both ppc64 and ppc64le guests */ + if (ARCH_IS_PPC64(data.arch)) + data.arch = VIR_ARCH_PPC64; + virMutexLock(&cache->lock); ret = virHashSearch(cache->binaries, virQEMUCapsCompareArch, &data); VIR_DEBUG("Returning caps %p for arch %s", ret, virArchToString(arch)); -- 2.4.3

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 01:53:52PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
When looking for a QEMU binary suitable for running ppc64le guests we have to take into account the fact that we use the QEMU target as key for the hash, so direct comparison is not good enough: normalize everything that can run on the ppc64 target to VIR_ARCH_PPC64 instead.
This approach was already used in virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch(), and I've added a comment there to clarify why it's needed.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260753 --- src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c index 4ad1bdb..a06141e 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c @@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch(virArch hostarch, const char *archstr; char *binary;
+ /* qemu-system-ppc64 can run both ppc64 and ppc64le guests */ if (ARCH_IS_PPC64(guestarch)) archstr = virQEMUCapsArchToString(VIR_ARCH_PPC64); else @@ -3791,6 +3792,10 @@ virQEMUCapsCacheLookupByArch(virQEMUCapsCachePtr cache, virQEMUCapsPtr ret = NULL; struct virQEMUCapsSearchData data = { .arch = arch };
+ /* QEMU's ppc64 target can run both ppc64 and ppc64le guests */ + if (ARCH_IS_PPC64(data.arch)) + data.arch = VIR_ARCH_PPC64; + virMutexLock(&cache->lock); ret = virHashSearch(cache->binaries, virQEMUCapsCompareArch, &data); VIR_DEBUG("Returning caps %p for arch %s", ret, virArchToString(arch));
The virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch metho already has a bunch of logic to deal with fact that one binary can support multiple different architectures. For example, x86_64 can support i686. It looks like we hit the same problem as ppc64/ppc64le in that case and you have not handled it here. It would be desirable to avoid having to have the same compat logic in two places too. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 13:48 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch metho already has a bunch of logic to deal with fact that one binary can support multiple different architectures. For example, x86_64 can support i686. It looks like we hit the same problem as ppc64/ppc64le in that case and you have not handled it here. It would be desirable to avoid having to have the same compat logic in two places too.
I've just sent out a v2[1] which takes the logic you're referring to out of virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch() and into a separate function which is then reused when looking up capabilities. Of course it's a slightly larger patch this time around :) Cheers. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-September/msg00475 .html -- Andrea Bolognani Software Engineer - Virtualization Team
participants (2)
-
Andrea Bolognani
-
Daniel P. Berrange