Am 07.03.2010 15:09, schrieb Varrun Ramani: I suggest you look through the archives, the topic comes up pretty regularly. Bottom line: - It should 'just work' for most users. - iptables modification are considered safe, more complex setups are out of scope for libvirt. example thread (with patch to disable iptables) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.libvirt/19438/focus=19456 fs

On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 07:39:59PM +0530, Varrun Ramani wrote: The 'virtual network' functionality in libvirt sets up a isolated bridge device, to which guests are connected. libvirt uses iptables to control what happens to traffic on that bridge device. Either we stop it leaving the bridge entirely (only VM<->VM and VM<->host), or allow it to get to the LAN either routing a subnet, or using NAT to masquerade it. The rules are written such that they only match traffic relating to the configured bridge device in libvirt, so they shouldn't expose the rest of the host interfaces to any new traffic risks Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|