[libvirt] [Libvirt]Install Libvirt errors
Hi all, I did following steps to install Libvirt. 1, git clone git://libvirt.org/libvirt.git 2, cd libvirt 3, ./autogen.sh 4, ./configure 5, make 6, sudo make install Therefore, after step 6, "sudo make install", i happened to some errors, which you can find these errors by clicking following link. http://paste.ubuntu.com/1589924/ Could anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks in advance ;-) -- Thanks Harry Wei
On 01/30/2013 08:47 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
Hi all,
I did following steps to install Libvirt.
1, git clone git://libvirt.org/libvirt.git 2, cd libvirt 3, ./autogen.sh 4, ./configure 5, make 6, sudo make install
Therefore, after step 6, "sudo make install", i happened to some errors, which you can find these errors by clicking following link. http://paste.ubuntu.com/1589924/
Pastebin links expire, making it harder to follow the conversation when revisiting the list archives in the future. It is okay to paste the actual error into the message rather than making people chase through a link.
Could anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks in advance ;-)
[...] /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xmlcatalog: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/bin//xmlcatalog) missing XHTML1 DTD Generating drvphyp.html.tmp
I'm not sure why your xsltproc is so noisy (it's probably a broken install that you ought to look into fixing), but that it outside the scope of the libvirt list. Meanwhile, your problem is definitely related to the fact that you don't have enough developer tools installed, but you are trying to build from git, and therefore the html files aren't pre-built. If you use the official libvirt 1.0.2 tarball (released today) instead of building from git, you would not have this problem. Otherwise, it sounds like you need to install the proper DTD files for generating the html files, before 'make install' has a chance of working. On Fedora, the packages are named xhtml1-dtds and docbook-dtds; I'm not sure what they are named on other distros. Also, be aware that it is possible to test a just-built libvirt without installing it first, by using './autogen.sh --system' to start the build, and then using './run daemon/libvirtd' after completing the build (for best results, you'll need to preinstall a distro build of libvirt, but then disable the distro service, so fhat all the auxiliary files that the in-tree binary wants to use will already be in place). -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
At Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:52:19 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/30/2013 08:47 AM, harryxiyou wrote:
Hi all,
I did following steps to install Libvirt.
1, git clone git://libvirt.org/libvirt.git 2, cd libvirt 3, ./autogen.sh 4, ./configure 5, make 6, sudo make install
Therefore, after step 6, "sudo make install", i happened to some errors, which you can find these errors by clicking following link. http://paste.ubuntu.com/1589924/
Pastebin links expire, making it harder to follow the conversation when revisiting the list archives in the future. It is okay to paste the actual error into the message rather than making people chase through a link.
Could anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks in advance ;-)
[...] /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xmlcatalog: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/bin//xmlcatalog) missing XHTML1 DTD Generating drvphyp.html.tmp
I'm not sure why your xsltproc is so noisy (it's probably a broken install that you ought to look into fixing), but that it outside the scope of the libvirt list. Meanwhile, your problem is definitely related to the fact that you don't have enough developer tools installed, but you are trying to build from git, and therefore the html files aren't pre-built. If you use the official libvirt 1.0.2 tarball (released today) instead of building from git, you would not have this problem. Otherwise, it sounds like you need to install the proper DTD files for generating the html files
AFAIK, the DTD files are not required, they are just used to validate the generated HTML files. Apparently, xsltproc is broken since there's a mismatch with its libraries. Why is xsltproc installed in /usr but the libraries in /usr/local ? Claudio -- AV-Test GmbH, Henricistraße 20, 04155 Leipzig, Germany Phone: +49 341 265 310 19 Web:<http://www.av-test.org> Eingetragen am / Registered at: Amtsgericht Stendal (HRB 114076) Geschaeftsfuehrer (CEO): Andreas Marx, Guido Habicht, Maik Morgenstern
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Claudio Bley <cbley@av-test.de> wrote: [...]
AFAIK, the DTD files are not required, they are just used to validate the generated HTML files.
Apparently, xsltproc is broken since there's a mismatch with its libraries. Why is xsltproc installed in /usr but the libraries in /usr/local ?
Sorry, i am not sure about this. -- Thanks Harry Wei
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: [...]
Pastebin links expire, making it harder to follow the conversation when revisiting the list archives in the future. It is okay to paste the actual error into the message rather than making people chase through a link.
You are right, i will do accoding to what you said. Thanks.
Could anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks in advance ;-)
[...] /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xmlcatalog: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/bin//xmlcatalog) missing XHTML1 DTD Generating drvphyp.html.tmp
I'm not sure why your xsltproc is so noisy (it's probably a broken install that you ought to look into fixing), but that it outside the scope of the libvirt list. Meanwhile, your problem is definitely related to the fact that you don't have enough developer tools installed, but you are trying to build from git, and therefore the html files aren't pre-built. If you use the official libvirt 1.0.2 tarball (released today) instead of building from git, you would not have this problem. Otherwise, it sounds like you need to install the proper DTD files for generating the html files, before 'make install' has a chance of working. On Fedora, the packages are named xhtml1-dtds and docbook-dtds; I'm not sure what they are named on other distros.
Also, be aware that it is possible to test a just-built libvirt without installing it first, by using './autogen.sh --system' to start the build, and then using './run daemon/libvirtd' after completing the build (for best results, you'll need to preinstall a distro build of libvirt, but then disable the distro service, so fhat all the auxiliary files that the in-tree binary wants to use will already be in place).
Hmmm..., actually, i can now use libvirt sucessfully. I forecast up errors does no matter with my using libvirt correctly, right? I use Libvirt to test Sheepdog storage driver for Libvirt and add my new storage driver. -- Thanks Harry Wei
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: [...]
[...] /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xsltproc: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0) /usr/bin//xmlcatalog: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /usr/bin//xmlcatalog) missing XHTML1 DTD Generating drvphyp.html.tmp
I'm not sure why your xsltproc is so noisy (it's probably a broken install that you ought to look into fixing), but that it outside the scope of the libvirt list. Meanwhile, your problem is definitely related to the fact that you don't have enough developer tools installed, but you are trying to build from git, and therefore the html files aren't pre-built. If you use the official libvirt 1.0.2 tarball (released today) instead of building from git, you would not have this problem. Otherwise, it sounds like you need to install the proper DTD files for generating the html files, before 'make install' has a chance of working. On Fedora, the packages are named xhtml1-dtds and docbook-dtds; I'm not sure what they are named on other distros.
In Ubuntu 10.04 desktop, i installed following packages and soloved up errors. $sudo aptitude install libghc6-xhtml-dev $sudo aptitude install w3c-dtd-xhtml $sudo aptitude install dtdinst Eric, thanks for your help ;-) -- Thanks Harry Wei
participants (3)
-
Claudio Bley -
Eric Blake -
harryxiyou