On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:37:24PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>From 74f57af2010f9cbe2315d625c6502a0b259e6802 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:03:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xm_internal.c: remove dead increment of "data"
* src/xm_internal.c (xenXMDomainConfigParse): Don't increment it.
---
src/xm_internal.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/xm_internal.c b/src/xm_internal.c
index f206c8c..18613d4 100644
--- a/src/xm_internal.c
+++ b/src/xm_internal.c
@@ -1314,7 +1314,6 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) {
if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')) || (data[0] == '\0'))
break;
- data++;
if (graphics->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC) {
if (STRPREFIX(key, "vncunused=")) {
trivial, ACK
>From d4db2dfaafbf827d1c8b8626a3dbdaa9f371e479 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
From: Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:09:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] xm_internal.c: remove four useless comparisons after strchr
* src/xm_internal.c (xenXMDomainConfigParse): After t=strchr...
don't test *t; it's known. This was *not* detected by clang,
but I spotted it since once instance was in the vicinity of the
dead increment of "data".
---
src/xm_internal.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/xm_internal.c b/src/xm_internal.c
index 18613d4..e7f6a55 100644
--- a/src/xm_internal.c
+++ b/src/xm_internal.c
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) {
*/
/* Extract the source file path*/
- if (!(offset = strchr(head, ',')) || offset[0] == '\0')
+ if (!(offset = strchr(head, ',')))
goto skipdisk;
if ((offset - head) >= (PATH_MAX-1))
goto skipdisk;
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) {
head = head + 6;
/* Extract the dest device name */
- if (!(offset = strchr(head, ',')) || offset[0] == '\0')
+ if (!(offset = strchr(head, ',')))
goto skipdisk;
if (VIR_ALLOC_N(disk->dst, (offset - head) + 1) < 0)
goto no_memory;
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) {
char *data;
char *nextkey = strchr(key, ',');
- if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')) || (data[0] == '\0'))
+ if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')))
goto skipnic;
data++;
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ xenXMDomainConfigParse(virConnectPtr conn, virConfPtr conf) {
nextkey++;
}
- if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')) || (data[0] == '\0'))
+ if (!(data = strchr(key, '=')))
break;
if (graphics->type == VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC) {
Hum, I would like to understand the intent of the person who wrote
this first, it's like one s trying to handle a case where strchr( ,c)
could return the pointer to the end of string if c is not found or
something like that. Weird ...
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/