[libvirt] virsh manpage bug: wrong argument order for virsh vol-resize

According to the manpage the arguments for virsh vol-resize are: vol-resize [--pool pool-or-uuid] vol-name-or-path pool-or-uuid capacity […] But actually only vol-resize --pool pool-or-uuid vol-name-or-path capacity or vol-resize vol-name-or-path capacity pool-or-uuid are accepted. So <capacity> and <pool-or-uuid> are swapped. Tested on Debian 9 (stretch): $ virsh --version 3.0.0 Best regards, Feiko Nanninga

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 05:43:11PM +0200, Feiko Nanninga wrote:
According to the manpage the arguments for virsh vol-resize are:
vol-resize [--pool pool-or-uuid] vol-name-or-path pool-or-uuid capacity […]
But actually only vol-resize --pool pool-or-uuid vol-name-or-path capacity
or vol-resize vol-name-or-path capacity pool-or-uuid
are accepted. So <capacity> and <pool-or-uuid> are swapped.
Tested on Debian 9 (stretch): $ virsh --version 3.0.0
Patch proposed: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-April/msg00573.html
Best regards, Feiko Nanninga
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
participants (2)
-
Feiko Nanninga
-
Martin Kletzander