[libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.4
Based on the discussions from last week, we are entering freeze now, I tagged v1.0.4-rc1 in git and pushed libvirt-1.0.4-rc1.tar.gz as well as rpms for F17 at the usual place: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ This looks functional for my limited testing, but give it a try. Hopefully since 1.0.3 wasn't too long ago we should be mostly okay :) And of course a release on April Fool sounds like a good target ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
On 25/03/13 21:42, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Based on the discussions from last week, we are entering freeze now, I tagged v1.0.4-rc1 in git and pushed libvirt-1.0.4-rc1.tar.gz as well as rpms for F17 at the usual place: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
This looks functional for my limited testing, but give it a try. Hopefully since 1.0.3 wasn't too long ago we should be mostly okay :)
And of course a release on April Fool sounds like a good target !
I just want to reply a "lol"......
I tagged it in git and pushed the tarball to the usual area: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ the rpms are being pushed ATM. Based on my own limited testing this still looks like good to go, but more feedback (portability ?) would be nice. If all goes well this will go out very early on Monday as scheduled, thanks ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Hi Daniel, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> wrote:
I tagged it in git and pushed the tarball to the usual area:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
the rpms are being pushed ATM. Based on my own limited testing this still looks like good to go, but more feedback (portability ?) would be nice. If all goes well this will go out very early on Monday as scheduled,
It fails to build on OSX Mountain Lion: CC libvirt_util_la-virutil.lo util/virutil.c:3586: error: conflicting types for 'virIsCapableFCHost' util/virutil.h:306: error: previous declaration of 'virIsCapableFCHost' was here make[3]: *** [libvirt_util_la-virutil.lo] Error 1 Kind regards, Ruben
On 28/03/13 19:36, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> wrote:
I tagged it in git and pushed the tarball to the usual area:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
the rpms are being pushed ATM. Based on my own limited testing this still looks like good to go, but more feedback (portability ?) would be nice. If all goes well this will go out very early on Monday as scheduled, It fails to build on OSX Mountain Lion:
CC libvirt_util_la-virutil.lo util/virutil.c:3586: error: conflicting types for 'virIsCapableFCHost' util/virutil.h:306: error: previous declaration of 'virIsCapableFCHost' was here make[3]: *** [libvirt_util_la-virutil.lo] Error 1
Was introduced by me. Fixed by: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg01614.html Osier
On 28/03/2013, at 3:08 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I tagged it in git and pushed the tarball to the usual area:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
the rpms are being pushed ATM. Based on my own limited testing this still looks like good to go, but more feedback (portability ?) would be nice. If all goes well this will go out very early on Monday as scheduled,
thanks !
Tried this on OSX 10.7.5, with Osier's build breaker patch added, and compilation succeeds. No vm's handy at the moment to try it out against though. :/ Hope that helps at least a bit. :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat twitter.com/realjustinclift
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 03:30:47AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 28/03/2013, at 3:08 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I tagged it in git and pushed the tarball to the usual area:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
the rpms are being pushed ATM. Based on my own limited testing this still looks like good to go, but more feedback (portability ?) would be nice. If all goes well this will go out very early on Monday as scheduled,
thanks !
Tried this on OSX 10.7.5, with Osier's build breaker patch added, and compilation succeeds.
No vm's handy at the moment to try it out against though. :/
Hope that helps at least a bit. :)
Yup, feel better seeing this just as I'm about to roll 1.0.4 :-) thanks ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:04:09AM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 03:30:47AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 28/03/2013, at 3:08 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I tagged it in git and pushed the tarball to the usual area:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
the rpms are being pushed ATM. Based on my own limited testing this still looks like good to go, but more feedback (portability ?) would be nice. If all goes well this will go out very early on Monday as scheduled,
thanks !
Tried this on OSX 10.7.5, with Osier's build breaker patch added, and compilation succeeds.
No vm's handy at the moment to try it out against though. :/
Hope that helps at least a bit. :)
Yup, feel better seeing this just as I'm about to roll 1.0.4 :-)
thanks !
I'm a bit late in the game this time but the build on the Debian buildds looks good: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libvirt&suite=experimental I still didn't get a chance to investigate the kFreeBSD failure but hopefully later this week. Cheers, -- Guido
participants (5)
-
Daniel Veillard -
Guido Günther -
Justin Clift -
Osier Yang -
Ruben Kerkhof