On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 15:53:32 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
While reviewing 1b43885d1784640 I've noticed a virReportError()
followed by a goto endjob; without setting the correct return
value. Problem is, if block job is so fast that it's bandwidth
does not fit into ulong, an error is reported. However, by that
time @ret is already set to 1 which means success. Since the
scenario can be hardly considered successful, we should return a
value meaning error.
I'd prefer if you dropped the beginning of the commit message describing
how you located this bug, just describing the bug itself.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
index 304165c..1161aa0 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
@@ -16546,6 +16546,7 @@ qemuDomainGetBlockJobInfo(virDomainPtr dom,
virReportError(VIR_ERR_OVERFLOW,
_("bandwidth %llu cannot be represented in result"),
rawInfo.bandwidth);
+ ret = -1;
goto endjob;
ACK,
Peter