[libvirt] Heads-up about the next release

The plan exposed last month is to push the new release mid month. I will be unavailable mostly on 15-16 so pondering pushing next week, which means entering freeze for example Tuesday morning for a final release toward Fri 12 or Sat 13. We have close to 300 commits already since 1.2.10 so that sounds about time :-) Please raise any issue with going forward with this plan, thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/

On 12/06/14 02:59, Daniel Veillard wrote:
The plan exposed last month is to push the new release mid month. I will be unavailable mostly on 15-16 so pondering pushing next week, which means entering freeze for example Tuesday morning for a final release toward Fri 12 or Sat 13. We have close to 300 commits already since 1.2.10 so that sounds about time :-)
Please raise any issue with going forward with this plan,
There's a few patches for the parallels driver that are around for some time. They already got some review from the parallels folks and should be basically ready to push. I wasn't able to do that yet though as I wanted to compile test them before doing so and I didn't have enough time to install the parallels SDK and compile test them. The open question now is whether we deem enough that the patches were tested and ACKed by parallels folks and push them or whether we need to check them before. Anyhow, they are around for quite a long time and I'd feel better if we'd merge them in this release. Peter

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 12/06/14 02:59, Daniel Veillard wrote:
The plan exposed last month is to push the new release mid month. I will be unavailable mostly on 15-16 so pondering pushing next week, which means entering freeze for example Tuesday morning for a final release toward Fri 12 or Sat 13. We have close to 300 commits already since 1.2.10 so that sounds about time :-)
Please raise any issue with going forward with this plan,
There's a few patches for the parallels driver that are around for some time. They already got some review from the parallels folks and should be basically ready to push.
I wasn't able to do that yet though as I wanted to compile test them before doing so and I didn't have enough time to install the parallels SDK and compile test them.
The open question now is whether we deem enough that the patches were tested and ACKed by parallels folks and push them or whether we need to check them before.
Anyhow, they are around for quite a long time and I'd feel better if we'd merge them in this release.
As long as they don't break a build with parallels disabled I think it is fine to merge them. We can assume the parallels people have tested them for now, until we get some kind of automated build system working with the parallels SDK Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
participants (3)
-
Daniel P. Berrange
-
Daniel Veillard
-
Peter Krempa