5:09 p.m.
Hi All,
I received a report [1] and verified that virtproxyd*.socket files have broken
syntax. E.g. from virtproxyd.socket
[Unit]
Description=Libvirt proxy local socket
Before=virtproxyd.service
libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket libvirtd-tcp.socket
libvirtd-tls.socket
virtproxyd.socket should 'Conflicts' with the libvirtd sockets. I suspect this
regressed in the switch to meson. I checked a libvirt 6.0.0 installation and
indeed it has
Conflicts=libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket
libvirtd-tcp.socket libvirtd-tls.socket
I blame it on Monday and my mind stuck in the weekend, but I spent too much time
trying to figure out how those socket files are generated before writing this
mail. It would be much appreciated if someone can give me a nudge in the right
direction :-).
Regards,
Jim
[1] https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181838
6:32 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:09 AM Jim Fehlig <jfehlig(a)suse.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I received a report [1] and verified that virtproxyd*.socket files have broken
syntax. E.g. from virtproxyd.socket
[Unit]
Description=Libvirt proxy local socket
Before=virtproxyd.service
libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket libvirtd-tcp.socket
libvirtd-tls.socket
virtproxyd.socket should 'Conflicts' with the libvirtd sockets. I suspect this
regressed in the switch to meson. I checked a libvirt 6.0.0 installation and
indeed it has
Conflicts=libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket
libvirtd-tcp.socket libvirtd-tls.socket
I blame it on Monday and my mind stuck in the weekend, but I spent too much time
trying to figure out how those socket files are generated before writing this
mail. It would be much appreciated if someone can give me a nudge in the right
direction :-).
*point*
-> src/remote/meson.build
227 virt_daemon_units += {
228 'service': 'virtproxyd',
229 'service_in': files('virtproxyd.service.in'),
230 'name': 'Libvirt proxy',
231 'sockprefix': 'libvirt',
232 'sockets': [ 'main', 'ro', 'admin',
'tcp', 'tls' ],
233 'deps': libvirtd_socket_conflicts,
234 }
-> src/meson.build
195 # virt_daemon_units:
196 # generate libvirt daemon systemd unit files
197 # * service - name of the service (required)
198 # * service_in - service source file (required)
199 # * name - socket description (required)
200 # * sockprefix - socket prefix name (required)
201 # * sockets - array of additional sockets (optional, default [
'main', 'ro', 'admin' ])
202 # * socket_$name_in - additional socket source files (optional,
default remote/libvirtd.socket.in )
203 # * deps - socket dependencies (optional, default '')
204 # * conflicts - if the service conflicts with libvirtd
(optional, true)
205 virt_daemon_units = []
...
792 foreach unit : virt_daemon_units
793 unit_conf = configuration_data()
794 unit_conf.set('runstatedir', runstatedir)
795 unit_conf.set('sbindir', sbindir)
796 unit_conf.set('sysconfdir', sysconfdir)
797 unit_conf.set('name', unit['name'])
798 unit_conf.set('service', unit['service'])
799 unit_conf.set('sockprefix', unit['sockprefix'])
800 unit_conf.set('deps', unit.get('deps', ''))
801 if conf.has('WITH_POLKIT')
802 unit_conf.set('mode', '0666')
803 else
804 unit_conf.set('mode', '0600')
805 endif
...
Also see:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/commit/dd4f2c73ad7f9fc0eae5325d5bf57...
So if not just an error/mistake somewhere, then setting
socket_$name_in and providing such a file with your needs could be a
start
Regards,
Jim
[1] https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181838
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
6:47 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:09:16PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Hi All,
I received a report [1] and verified that virtproxyd*.socket files have
broken syntax. E.g. from virtproxyd.socket
[Unit]
Description=Libvirt proxy local socket
Before=virtproxyd.service
libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket libvirtd-tcp.socket
libvirtd-tls.socket
virtproxyd.socket should 'Conflicts' with the libvirtd sockets. I suspect
this regressed in the switch to meson. I checked a libvirt 6.0.0
installation and indeed it has
Conflicts=libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket
libvirtd-tcp.socket libvirtd-tls.socket
I blame it on Monday and my mind stuck in the weekend, but I spent too much
time trying to figure out how those socket files are generated before
writing this mail. It would be much appreciated if someone can give me a
nudge in the right direction :-).
The original src/remote/Makefile.inc.am code did
-e 's|[@]deps[@]|Conflicts=$(LIBVIRTD_SOCKET_UNIT_FILES)|g' \
but src/remote/meson.build just does
libvirtd_socket_conflicts = ' '.join(libvirtd_socket_unit_files)
so missing the "Conflicts=" part.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
7:56 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:09:16PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Hi All,
I received a report [1] and verified that virtproxyd*.socket files have broken
syntax. E.g. from virtproxyd.socket
[Unit]
Description=Libvirt proxy local socket
Before=virtproxyd.service
libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket libvirtd-tcp.socket
libvirtd-tls.socket
virtproxyd.socket should 'Conflicts' with the libvirtd sockets. I suspect this
regressed in the switch to meson. I checked a libvirt 6.0.0 installation and
indeed it has
Conflicts=libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket
libvirtd-tcp.socket libvirtd-tls.socket
It looks like the issue might have various root causes as I am unsure myself
about what exactly was the idea behind some of the actions in the code. But all
the .socket files are generated from `src/remote/libvirtd.socket.in` and the line which
causes trouble for you is probably this one:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/remote/libvirt...
This is used in `src/meson.build` to generate socket files for all the services:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/meson.build#L7...
The proxy daemon service lists the other sockets as dependencies here (even though it uses
variable clearly named `*_conflicts`):
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/remote/meson.b...
and I'm not sure whether that should be prefixed with "Conflicts=" or
whether
the `conflicts` field should come into play, although it looks like it is not
used anywhere else:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/meson.build#L204
So long story short: I do not have a right solution for you, but I hope this can
help you figure out where to go from here.
Actually, let me check if the `deps` are used anywhere else for a unit... yep,
it is, for virtxend and it actually uses it for the whole line it needs in that
context. So maybe a simple patch like this could help?
diff --git i/src/remote/meson.build w/src/remote/meson.build
index 9ad2f6ab1c26..0a188268b58b 100644
--- i/src/remote/meson.build
+++ w/src/remote/meson.build
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ if conf.has('WITH_REMOTE')
'name': 'Libvirt proxy',
'sockprefix': 'libvirt',
'sockets': [ 'main', 'ro', 'admin', 'tcp',
'tls' ],
- 'deps': libvirtd_socket_conflicts,
+ 'deps': 'Conflicts=' + libvirtd_socket_conflicts,
}
openrc_init_files += {
--
I'm not well versed in the systemd unit files, so feel free to adjust for
whatever feels right.
I hope that helps, have a nice day.
Martin
I blame it on Monday and my mind stuck in the weekend, but I spent too
much time
trying to figure out how those socket files are generated before writing this
mail. It would be much appreciated if someone can give me a nudge in the right
direction :-).
Regards,
Jim
[1] https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181838
11:58 a.m.
On 2/9/21 6:56 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:09:16PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Hi All,
Thanks to everyone for the hints!
> I received a report [1] and verified that virtproxyd*.socket
files have broken
> syntax. E.g. from virtproxyd.socket
>
> [Unit]
> Description=Libvirt proxy local socket
> Before=virtproxyd.service
> libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket libvirtd-tcp.socket
> libvirtd-tls.socket
>
> virtproxyd.socket should 'Conflicts' with the libvirtd sockets. I suspect
this
> regressed in the switch to meson. I checked a libvirt 6.0.0 installation and
> indeed it has
>
> Conflicts=libvirtd.socket libvirtd-ro.socket libvirtd-admin.socket
> libvirtd-tcp.socket libvirtd-tls.socket
>
It looks like the issue might have various root causes as I am unsure myself
about what exactly was the idea behind some of the actions in the code. But all
the .socket files are generated from `src/remote/libvirtd.socket.in` and the
line which causes trouble for you is probably this one:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/remote/libvirt...
This is used in `src/meson.build` to generate socket files for all the services:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/meson.build#L7...
The proxy daemon service lists the other sockets as dependencies here (even
though it uses variable clearly named `*_conflicts`):
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/remote/meson.b...
and I'm not sure whether that should be prefixed with "Conflicts=" or
whether
the `conflicts` field should come into play, although it looks like it is not
used anywhere else:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/a619e28dba8c/src/meson.build#L204
Yeah, afaict it is not used. I can send a separate patch to remove it.
So long story short: I do not have a right solution for you, but I
hope this can
help you figure out where to go from here.
Yes, it was helpful. Thanks for all the details!
Actually, let me check if the `deps` are used anywhere else for a
unit... yep,
it is, for virtxend and it actually uses it for the whole line it needs in that
context. So maybe a simple patch like this could help?
Yes, I think adding the Conflicts= when the virtproxyd unit is defined is the
better way to go. I've sent your patch :-)
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-February/msg00607.html
Regards,
Jim
1382
days inactive
1383
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Christian Ehrhardt -
Daniel P. Berrangé -
Jim Fehlig -
Martin Kletzander