On 7/28/20 7:32 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 7/28/20 6:16 AM, Paulo de Rezende Pinatti wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paulo de Rezende Pinatti <ppinatti(a)linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> docs/formatnode.html.in | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/formatnode.html.in b/docs/formatnode.html.in
> index e4328fedbe..8a51c4da80 100644
> --- a/docs/formatnode.html.in
> +++ b/docs/formatnode.html.in
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
> In this case this device is an SRIOV PF, and
> the capability
> element will have a list of <code>address</code>
> subelements, one for each VF on this PF. If the
> host system
> - supports reporting it (via the "sriov_maxvfs"
> file in the
> + supports reporting it (via the "sriov_totalvfs"
> file in the
I checked in the Linux kernel and there is no reference to
'sriov_maxvfs'.
This means that it's not likely to be something that it's one way in
s390x/powerpc but another way in x86.
Also, googling 'sriov_maxvfs' gives 3 results only. First result isn't
related to a sriov_maxvfs file, the remaining results are links to this
Libvirt documentation. So yeah.
Late to the party, but as the person who put this typo into the tree, I
can verify that it is indeed a typo, and never had any basis in reality. :-P
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413(a)gmail.com>
> device's sysfs directory) the capability
> element will also
> have an attribute named <code>maxCount</code>
> which is the
> maximum number of SRIOV VFs supported by this
> device, which
>