1:48 p.m.
Attached is an updated version of my previous patch to add gettext support
to libvirt. It should be pretty self-explanatory - basically wrapping all
strings with _(..) or gettext_noop(...) where appropriate. I also took
the opportunity to make some of the messages more consistent with each
other.
(To cut down size, I'm not including the actual libvirt.pot file )
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
2:05 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:48:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Attached is an updated version of my previous patch to add gettext
support
to libvirt. It should be pretty self-explanatory - basically wrapping all
strings with _(..) or gettext_noop(...) where appropriate. I also took
the opportunity to make some of the messages more consistent with each
other.
Opps, used old skool diff format. Re-attaching as a unified diff this time...
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
3:10 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:48:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Attached is an updated version of my previous patch to add gettext support
> to libvirt. It should be pretty self-explanatory - basically wrapping all
> strings with _(..) or gettext_noop(...) where appropriate. I also took
> the opportunity to make some of the messages more consistent with each
> other.
Opps, used old skool diff format. Re-attaching as a unified diff this time...
That's big, but that's needed, so ... I'm wondering about 2 things:
- shouldn't this also affect the spec file ?
I didn't noticed anything in the patch for libvirt.spec.in while I
expected something :-)
- can libvirt and virsh localizations be in separate catalogs ?
somehow it feel like they should be distinct so that apps using
libvirt don't have to load virsh strings too, but 1/ this may be
nitpicking 2/ this may be already the case but I didn't spot it
in the virsh.c patch
thanks :-)
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
3:27 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:48:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Attached is an updated version of my previous patch to add gettext support
> > to libvirt. It should be pretty self-explanatory - basically wrapping all
> > strings with _(..) or gettext_noop(...) where appropriate. I also took
> > the opportunity to make some of the messages more consistent with each
> > other.
>
> Opps, used old skool diff format. Re-attaching as a unified diff this time...
That's big, but that's needed, so ... I'm wondering about 2 things:
- shouldn't this also affect the spec file ?
I didn't noticed anything in the patch for libvirt.spec.in while I
expected something :-)
Hmm, yes it should - I didn't notice we kept the .spec in CVS - I thought it
was only in Fedora CVS.
- can libvirt and virsh localizations be in separate catalogs ?
somehow it feel like they should be distinct so that apps using
libvirt don't have to load virsh strings too, but 1/ this may be
nitpicking 2/ this may be already the case but I didn't spot it
in the virsh.c patch
They're currently setup to use the same catalog since it makes the build
system integration a hell of alot easier - the generic Makefiles installed
by gettext all assume a single .pot file. The virsh strings are about 50%
of the total translatable text, and the compiled .gmo file is 24 kb so we'd
only be saving about 12 KB of memory splitting them out. This is pretty
much just line-noise compared to 400 KB which libvirt.so comes in at.
Regards,
Dan
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
2:20 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:27:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:05:29PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:48:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > Attached is an updated version of my previous patch to add gettext
support
> > > to libvirt. It should be pretty self-explanatory - basically wrapping all
> > > strings with _(..) or gettext_noop(...) where appropriate. I also took
> > > the opportunity to make some of the messages more consistent with each
> > > other.
> >
> > Opps, used old skool diff format. Re-attaching as a unified diff this time...
>
> That's big, but that's needed, so ... I'm wondering about 2 things:
> - shouldn't this also affect the spec file ?
> I didn't noticed anything in the patch for libvirt.spec.in while I
> expected something :-)
Hmm, yes it should - I didn't notice we kept the .spec in CVS - I thought it
was only in Fedora CVS.
Yeah I have strange habits sometimes, but it's more informations relative
to the project which can be useful. Also allow rpmbuild -ta if you just get
the tarball.
> - can libvirt and virsh localizations be in separate
catalogs ?
> somehow it feel like they should be distinct so that apps using
> libvirt don't have to load virsh strings too, but 1/ this may be
> nitpicking 2/ this may be already the case but I didn't spot it
> in the virsh.c patch
They're currently setup to use the same catalog since it makes the build
system integration a hell of alot easier - the generic Makefiles installed
by gettext all assume a single .pot file. The virsh strings are about 50%
of the total translatable text, and the compiled .gmo file is 24 kb so we'd
only be saving about 12 KB of memory splitting them out. This is pretty
much just line-noise compared to 400 KB which libvirt.so comes in at.
okay it doesn't really make sense, fine, just commit when you're ready,
I will try to push a new release soonish !
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
9:31 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:20:23AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:27:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> Hmm, yes it should - I didn't notice we kept the .spec in CVS - I thought it
> was only in Fedora CVS.
Yeah I have strange habits sometimes, but it's more informations relative
to the project which can be useful. Also allow rpmbuild -ta if you just get
the tarball.
I also updated the .spec to include the compiled .po files, and added
a BuildRequires on gettext, etc. Also fixed the URL to refer to libvirt.org
(with the 't')
> They're currently setup to use the same catalog since it
makes the build
> system integration a hell of alot easier - the generic Makefiles installed
> by gettext all assume a single .pot file. The virsh strings are about 50%
> of the total translatable text, and the compiled .gmo file is 24 kb so we'd
> only be saving about 12 KB of memory splitting them out. This is pretty
> much just line-noise compared to 400 KB which libvirt.so comes in at.
okay it doesn't really make sense, fine, just commit when you're ready,
I will try to push a new release soonish !
Ok its commited now. I did a test compile & re-build of the RPM & it looks
like it worked correctly.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
6636
days inactive
6637
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel P. Berrange -
Daniel Veillard