[libvirt] [PATCH] spec: Fix minor changelog issues
When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so that it does not appear expanded in package changelog. Wed Jul 5 2011 is incorrect since Jul 5 was Tuesday. Let's suppose it was a result of incomplete update (Tue -> Wed) and change Jul 5 to Jul 6. --- libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 8df908d..8b2458d 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -2309,7 +2309,7 @@ fi * Fri Apr 3 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.2-1 - release of 0.6.2 -* Fri Mar 4 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.1-1 +* Fri Mar 6 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.1-1 - release of 0.6.1 * Sat Jan 31 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.0-1 @@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ fi - it's pkgconfig not pgkconfig ! * Mon Nov 6 2006 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> 0.1.8-2 -- fixing spec file, added %dist, -devel requires pkgconfig and xen-devel +- fixing spec file, added %%dist, -devel requires pkgconfig and xen-devel - Resolves: rhbz#202320 * Mon Oct 16 2006 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> 0.1.8-1 -- 1.8.1.2
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 13:45:01 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so that it does not appear expanded in package changelog.
Wed Jul 5 2011 is incorrect since Jul 5 was Tuesday. Let's suppose it was a result of incomplete update (Tue -> Wed) and change Jul 5 to Jul 6.
Heh, this is obviously wrong, I was looking at different changelog :-) This should be Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wednesday. Since libvirt-0.6.1 was released on Mar 4 2009, we should change Fri to Wed. Which is not what I did, so v2 is coming soon :-)
-* Fri Mar 4 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.1-1 +* Fri Mar 6 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.1-1 - release of 0.6.1
Jirka
participants (1)
-
Jiri Denemark