[PATCH] docs: domaincaps: Mention VIR_DOMAIN_UNDEFINE_CHECKPOINTS_METADATA

The flag for the virDomainUndefine API is supported even if we report that <backup supported='no'/>. Mention it in the docs. Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> --- docs/formatdomaincaps.html.in | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/formatdomaincaps.html.in b/docs/formatdomaincaps.html.in index aa4dece220..66e758501b 100644 --- a/docs/formatdomaincaps.html.in +++ b/docs/formatdomaincaps.html.in @@ -566,7 +566,10 @@ <p>Reports whether the hypervisor supports the backup, checkpoint, and related features. (<code>virDomainBackupBegin</code>, - <code>virDomainCheckpointCreateXML</code> etc). + <code>virDomainCheckpointCreateXML</code> etc). The presence of the + <code>backup</code> element even if <code>supported='no'</code> implies that + the <code>VIR_DOMAIN_UNDEFINE_CHECKPOINTS_METADATA</code> flag for + <code>virDomainUndefine</code> is supported. </p> <h4><a id="elementsSEV">SEV capabilities</a></h4> -- 2.24.1

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 18:58:01 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
The flag for the virDomainUndefine API is supported even if we report that <backup supported='no'/>. Mention it in the docs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> --- docs/formatdomaincaps.html.in | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Ping?

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 06:58:01PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
The flag for the virDomainUndefine API is supported even if we report that <backup supported='no'/>. Mention it in the docs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> --- docs/formatdomaincaps.html.in | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
participants (2)
-
Pavel Hrdina
-
Peter Krempa