[libvirt] [PATCH] configure: Remove unused brctl check
brctl isn't used anywhere AFAICT --- configure.ac | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 5d1bc6b..59a3d6d 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -318,8 +318,6 @@ AC_PATH_PROG([DNSMASQ], [dnsmasq], [dnsmasq], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([RADVD], [radvd], [radvd], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) -AC_PATH_PROG([BRCTL], [brctl], [brctl], - [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([TC], [tc], [tc], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([UDEVADM], [udevadm], [], -- 1.8.2.1
On 06/11/2013 06:07 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
brctl isn't used anywhere AFAICT
Too true. We switched to ioctls a long time ago. ACK.
--- configure.ac | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 5d1bc6b..59a3d6d 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -318,8 +318,6 @@ AC_PATH_PROG([DNSMASQ], [dnsmasq], [dnsmasq], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([RADVD], [radvd], [radvd], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) -AC_PATH_PROG([BRCTL], [brctl], [brctl], - [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([TC], [tc], [tc], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([UDEVADM], [udevadm], [],
On 06/11/2013 09:56 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 06/11/2013 06:07 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
brctl isn't used anywhere AFAICT
Too true. We switched to ioctls a long time ago.
ACK.
Thanks, pushed. (though how did I get dropped from the CC? Is that intentional on your part? It's the second time I've noticed that happened with a patch response from you). - Cole
--- configure.ac | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 5d1bc6b..59a3d6d 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -318,8 +318,6 @@ AC_PATH_PROG([DNSMASQ], [dnsmasq], [dnsmasq], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([RADVD], [radvd], [radvd], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) -AC_PATH_PROG([BRCTL], [brctl], [brctl], - [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([TC], [tc], [tc], [/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH]) AC_PATH_PROG([UDEVADM], [udevadm], [],
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 06/12/2013 11:51 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 06/11/2013 09:56 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 06/11/2013 06:07 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
brctl isn't used anywhere AFAICT Too true. We switched to ioctls a long time ago.
ACK.
Thanks, pushed.
(though how did I get dropped from the CC? Is that intentional on your part? It's the second time I've noticed that happened with a patch response from you).
I purposefully don't put Cc's in list mail unless I know that the person I'm replying to isn't subscribed to the list. This is based on my own experience with responses Cc'ed to me ending up in the wrong place, either not threaded properly or in the wrong folder (i.e. I prefer to *not* be Cc'ed). If you prefer being Cc'ed then I'll do that from now on.
participants (2)
-
Cole Robinson -
Laine Stump