On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:55:52PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Now that we've moved all the actual code into helper
functions, we can turn it into a switch statement.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
---
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index 7f66fa27ff..ffdc027983 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -4966,33 +4966,72 @@ virDomainDeviceDefPostParseCommon(virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev,
unsigned int parseFlags ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
virDomainXMLOptionPtr xmlopt)
{
- if (dev->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CHR)
- return virDomainChrDefPostParse(dev->data.chr, def);
+ int ret = -1;
With the preparatory patches adding an exit point in every if, I
expected the 'return's to stay.
- if (dev->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_RNG)
- return virDomainRNGDefPostParse(dev->data.rng);
+ switch ((virDomainDeviceType)dev->type) {
[...]
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NONE:
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
+ _("unexpected VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NONE"));
+ break;
+
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_LAST:
+ default:
+ virReportEnumRangeError(virDomainDeviceType, dev->type);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
But I'm not sure how some tools would handle the (lack of) presence
of this return.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
Jano
}