[PATCHv2] Fix format network dns doc

The code block on the srv name in the formatnetwork page is confusing since the actual parameter is service. Moving the code block to the service work makes it better. --- Diff to v1: * remove the word 'name' docs/formatnetwork.html.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/formatnetwork.html.in b/docs/formatnetwork.html.in index f5a48d9b92..b1b2391f43 100644 --- a/docs/formatnetwork.html.in +++ b/docs/formatnetwork.html.in @@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ <dd>The <code>dns</code> element can have also 0 or more <code>srv</code> record elements. Each <code>srv</code> record element defines a DNS SRV record and has 2 mandatory and 5 optional attributes. The mandatory attributes - are service <code>name</code> and <code>protocol</code> (tcp, udp) + are <code>service</code> and <code>protocol</code> (tcp, udp) and the optional attributes are <code>target</code>, <code>port</code>, <code>priority</code>, <code>weight</code> and <code>domain</code> as defined in DNS server SRV RFC (RFC 2782). -- 2.29.2

On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 09:50 +0100, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote:
The code block on the srv name in the formatnetwork page is confusing since the actual parameter is service. Moving the code block to the service work makes it better. ---
Diff to v1: * remove the word 'name'
docs/formatnetwork.html.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Oh, you could have just fixed that locally before pushing, without having to respin :) Either way, Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
participants (2)
-
Andrea Bolognani
-
Cédric Bosdonnat