On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:07:47PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:23:35AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:38:15AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 01:50:37PM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > > Running 'virsh pool-list' seems to deadlock libvirtd. Dan gave me
some
> > > debugging tips, and I managed to track it down to the poolGetAutostart
> > > function. The attached patch fixes the issue.
> >
> > Argh, +1
> > I wonder why the CIL static analysis didn't point this out... this
> > doesn't look really different from other lockings.
>
> It did catch it. Unfortunately when I finally applied the patchs there
> was a merge conflict and i missed out this chunk, and then didn't run
> the CIL analysis again :-(
>
> Its on my todo list to get it integrated into 'make check'....
Ouch, that's a bunch of dependancies ! And maybe I should make
some progresses in that Ocaml tutorial I have open for 10 days now ...
I'd certainly make it optional - just have it skip the analysis if it
found that OCaml was not installed.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|